Originally posted by golddragnet
it is quite interesting, I did look at the other clips again and the Powell one does look odd. Maybe there is something in what Icke has been saying. I can't say I believe any of the shape-shifting lizard stuff at all, but I won't dismiss it entirely either, from what little I have heard Icke say about it I gather he is stateing that those shape-shifting lizards are in the same lickness as the lizard or serpeant who tempeted Eve in the garden of eden, and who tempted Jesus when he was walking thru the desert for 40 days.
If there is anything in your clips it would suggest that their "shapeshifting" occurs faster than the human eye can see but can be caught on camera when slowed down. However I do still think it is merely distortion, but keep researching if you feel you have found something very odd.

Originally posted by Palasheea
At this request of a couple of members who commented in this thread, I recorded those 2 celebrity movies because they wanted me to record someone who is NOT CLASSIFIED as reptilian. That's why those movies are posted here -- and also to show that even when parts of those movies get blurry, weird face transformatons are still not seen in those movies of those who are have not been identified as reptilian -- Tom Cruise and Britney Spears on not on Icke's reptilian list.

Originally posted by HankMcCoy
This is rediculous at best. Come on, am I missing the joke here?

A bunch of BAD quality videos supposedly showing tranformations of reptilians? Use your own critical thinking on this on.

Originally posted by CaptainLazy
It's almost as if your making the video quality bad on purpose to falsify results.

Viewing the original videos there is nothing abnormal. The colin Powel one was motionblur from you moving the camera for christs sake.

Originally posted by Reality Hurts
I'm on the fence as well.

But did you ever notice that you never see 1st generation unedited footage of "shifting"? It's always recordings of recordings of recordings. No one ever has 1st hand "I recorded this myself" copies, all you see is edited copied, posted on the internet, taken from a recorded television copy that was originally pool footage from some conference.

Degraded and modified recordings are more likely to be of poorer quality. The best footage is first hand.

Which leads me to ask, why is the original poster of this thread taking it a step further and purposely making a very very low quality recording of what is probably a 4th generation copy anyways?





[edit on 18-12-2006 by Reality Hurts]

Originally posted by Palasheea
I'm a video ITC experimenter and those clips I've shown here were taken with my webcam when I recorded those video's that were online of these people Icke has identified as Reptilian hybrids or something like that.
Interestingly enough, no matter how many movies I recorded of online movies of V.Pres. Cheney (who is also on Icke's reptoid list), his face did not transform in any way at all in any of them! This surprised me because after seeing Bush and Rumsfeld's faces changing into very sinister looking beings, I thought Cheney's face would be showing the same kind of results but apparently not -- but I only did this experiment once... it was just a one day project.
I also recorded some movies of Tom Cruise and a few others who are not on Icke's reptoid list and none of those had any facial transformations in them.
At any rate, I get better results using a cheap webcam because it's easier for my 'contacts' who are working with me from the other side to work with larger and less pixels to create such anomalous etheric 'effects', trans-dimensional images -- whatever one wants to call them.

In addition to this, when showing the results of such experiments to others, those skeptics out there who accuse us (ITC experimenters) of photoshopping those frames in those movies can't prove that because it's much more difficult to convincingly fake movies made by cheap webcams as any photoshop additions or changes in those frames of those movies would be much more evident due to the fewer, hence larger pixels where even the best artists out there would not be able to make those changes or additions to those movies seam-less enough to pass the BS-test and there are programs out there now that can detect such changes and or additions in a matter of seconds at the click of a button!
On the other hand, it's much easier for scam artists to get away with faking anomolous 'effects' in movies made by expensive camera's but that's also changing now because there are several different programs being developed now that will soon be out on the market for everyone to use to analyze high pixel photos and movies to determine if they've been tampered with or not. Once those software programs are available to the general public, I will switch over to a better camera than what I'm using now. But once again, as it now stands, I get more interesting results using my cheap webcam and to me, it's all about results and if I myself can see those results or not. If I think others can also see those results, then I show them to them..