It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Saviour Of The Real
DISCLOSURE IS IMMINENT
Why? Because a few presumably credible and qualified people reported seeing a UFO? This is not the first time and it won’t be the last.
Originally posted by Saviour Of The Real
THE CIA CONTROLS THE MEDIA
Originally posted by Saviour Of The Real
IT’S DISINFORMATION
Originally posted by Saviour Of The Real
THE FAA IS IRRESPONSBLE BY NOT INVESTIGATING THIS
Originally posted by Saviour Of The Real
Shouldn’t all the other possibilities be ruled out first? How much information do you really have to base your opinion on at this point?
Originally posted by lost_shaman
I say we start with "lights reflecting off the clouds" at 4:30pm near Chicago.
The truth is there’s no evidence to suggest these objects, whatever they are, have any significant mass, so there’s no danger of collision.
I'm sorry, but if a few pilots say they saw a "Flying Saucer" UFO, then they saw a UFO. They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.
Originally posted by Saviour Of The Real
And you think this person is in a position to be qualified to comment because?
Originally posted by Scramjet76
The truth is there’s no evidence to suggest these objects, whatever they are, have any significant mass, so there’s no danger of collision.
*buzzer sounds*
Hmm not quite. There are documented UFO cases where an object has landed on railroad ties. The crumbling strength of various woods is well known. Using this and an estimate of the objects physical dimensions combined with a little math, has determined that UFOs have a lot of mass and are nearly the density of a submarine.
I'm sorry, but if a few pilots say they saw a "Flying Saucer" UFO, then they saw a UFO. They have nothing to gain and everything to lose.
Originally posted by Saviour Of The Real
What part exactly about this sighting says “alien spacecraft” to you? Shouldn’t all the other possibilities be ruled out first? How much information do you really have to base your opinion on at this point?
Originally posted by lost_shaman
Originally posted by Saviour Of The Real
THE FAA IS IRRESPONSBLE BY NOT INVESTIGATING THIS
Wrong Again!
The FAA "spokesperson" offered 'their' "Theory". Remember , lights on the Clouds can do "funny things".
Originally posted by Essan
Exactly. It could be an alien spacecraft. But ball lightning also explains every aspect of the case ....
Originally posted by Essan
Exactly. It could be an alien spacecraft. But ball lightning also explains every aspect of the case ....
Maybe the radar messes with the cloaking somehow.I believe I've read that radar makes these things crash.Just a thought.
Originally posted by SkyWay
Originally posted by Essan
Exactly. It could be an alien spacecraft. But ball lightning also explains every aspect of the case ....
It couldn't have been ball lightning because the witnesses described it as metallic. It wasn't anymore ball lightning than the planes flying in and out of O'hare airport.
I wonder why these ufo pilots would allow themselves to be seen at this time. They seem to have cloaking ability that renders their craft virtually invisible so why did they not activate it? Maybe there was some breakdown in their system.
One thing is clear. They're here.
Originally posted by crowpruitt
Maybe the radar messes with the cloaking somehow.I believe I've read that radar makes these things crash.Just a thought.
Originally posted by crowpruitt
Maybe the radar messes with the cloaking somehow.I believe I've read that radar makes these things crash.Just a thought.
Originally posted by SkyWay
Originally posted by Essan
Exactly. It could be an alien spacecraft. But ball lightning also explains every aspect of the case ....
It couldn't have been ball lightning because the witnesses described it as metallic.
Originally posted by Essan
Originally posted by SkyWay
It couldn't have been ball lightning because the witnesses described it as metallic.
That doesn't necessarily exclude the possibility Why can't ball lightning have a metallic appearance under some circumstances? We know so little about it ....