O'Hare Airport UFO Sighting -- UPDATE: Photos & Analysis, page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 86 times


reply posted on 2-1-2007 @ 06:33 PM by snafu7700
Originally posted by Funkydung

well what if the other source that was listening to the controller at the time was paid to say that. what if both of them have been paid to say what they are saying. what if they were'nt even paid they just do this for a deeper reason. like i said what if this is all made up? sure they say there are witnesses but were there really? just part of the story to make it seem more real? and if they do come up with some witnesses..are they being paid? are they saying what they were told to say? get what im saying?


what if the moon were actually made of green cheese? too many what ifs in your post for me. of course, you are free to believe whatever you want, but i personally think that if the government tried to tell controllers from whom they have taken pay and to whom they have increased the workload to lie to the media, the exact words for the controller would be something like "go *&%$ yourself."

Originally posted by SkyWay

Maybe if the information were not withheld from us for 2 months! we would be able to submit the requests within the 15 days. That's kind of underhanded...to require requests for information to be submitted within 15 days but the information is not revealed to the public for 2 months. That isn't really a requirement to obtain information. What it really amounts to is a denial of information.


according to the National UFO Reporting Center, the incident was reported less than a week after it happened. so i think my response would be "why didnt an entity whose sole purpose is to investigate ufos ask the faa for the tapes before they were erased?"

here's the source for that report:

nuforc.org



reply posted on 2-1-2007 @ 06:48 PM by Funkydung
Originally posted by Funkydung

well what if the other source that was listening to the controller at the time was paid to say that. what if both of them have been paid to say what they are saying. what if they were'nt even paid they just do this for a deeper reason. like i said what if this is all made up? sure they say there are witnesses but were there really? just part of the story to make it seem more real? and if they do come up with some witnesses..are they being paid? are they saying what they were told to say? get what im saying?


what if the moon were actually made of green cheese?


who am i to say that its not. just because someone who thinks they are in charge tells me its made out of cheese i am just suppose to automatically belive them? i have never been to the moon so i dont know if its made of green cheese or not.

too many what ifs in your post for me. of course, you are free to believe whatever you want, but i personally think that if the government tried to tell controllers from whom they have taken pay and to whom they have increased the workload to lie to the media, the exact words for the controller would be something like "go *&%$ yourself."


forget about the real controllers for a min.
what i am saying is that there may have not even been a sighting there. i mean come on. the interview with the so called witness on the rense mp3 said it hovered there for 20 min! 20 min and not one single snap shot of this thing? this witness imo was not even close to the airport on that night. the controllers you are reading about doesnt even work there. do you get what im saying?? could the witnesses and controller be cia getting on the radio and tv saying that this happened. yet no witnesses or photos even people that live there say that they have never heard about the story untill they got on here. so what its on the news! doesnt make it real. radio or tv.
ever heard what happened when the war of the worlds was broadcast on the radio in the 1930s?


On October 30th, 1938, the United States experienced mass hysteria--most pronounced on the east coast in New York and New Jersey--in response to a radio broadcast put on by Orson Welles and his Mercury Theater On The Air. The public reaction has prompted decades of research into mass hysteria, been used as a model by the military around the world to design information warfare against enemy troops and civilian populace, and used as the most compelling reason to protect the public from the knowledge of the presence of aliens on Earth.
www.war-of-the-worlds.org...


i guess you can say that whatever you see or hear on tv or radio or internet or newspapers...etc....could be a pile of @%x*. but how do we know what real and whats not you ask? that for you to decide. but if you belive something without no facts, nothing but seeing it on fox news (example) or some idiot comes on the radio and blabs about life from somewhere in this universe just hoovered for 20 min at a very busy airport....but he is the only one talking? that town should have been lit up with all kinds of people yelling about it. if that really happened there is no way the information would have been held down like it is with this story. nobody saying anything no pictures no nothing. cia? probably.




[edit on 2-1-2007 by Funkydung]
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 7 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 16 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 10 days ago with 31 member flags
The Dyatlov Pass Incident--Russia\'s Mountain of Death
  Posted 17 days ago with 28 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 1 days ago with 27 member flags