It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jbondo
Jeff Ritzman has done it right here at ATS.
Sky, I know you saw his reproductions and are aware of how thoroughly he proved BM to be a hoax. I thought you were around for that, no?
How can you continue to defend this guy?
[edit on 6-12-2006 by jbondo]
Originally posted by Crakeur
Underground Video promoted his videos and then filed a class action lawsuit against him after learning that he was selling hoax videos. His alien is a model from a sears catalogue. his dinosaur footage is from some old movie or tv show.
if you want to hang your hopes on him, so be it. You might also want to check out other reputable folks such as those at Slurpo. Might as well shoot the moon.
Originally posted by Crakeur
actually, someone or some group did find some damning evidence to the contrary regarding his photos, including the still photo taken of an alien that was really a still from an old tv show, a pie tin space craft and a few other space crafts made, apparently, in his garage.
Originally posted by SkyWay
Originally posted by jbondo
Jeff Ritzman has done it right here at ATS.
Sky, I know you saw his reproductions and are aware of how thoroughly he proved BM to be a hoax. I thought you were around for that, no?
How can you continue to defend this guy?
[edit on 6-12-2006 by jbondo]
This is the first of heard of that guy. How about posting a link to the place where he proves, according to you, that Billy Meier is hoaxing.
Originally posted by Dallas
I'd prefer discussion be more focused on particular segments of the presentation rather than just deciding if you believe Meier's story as a whole
Originally posted by jritzmann
btw Skyway, my ship is a small one made of plastic. Meier has used plates, trashcan lids (as shown...which I dont see you mention), luggage clasps, etc.
Also, please take note that you seem perfectly satisfied to look at Meier's photos with no questions, yet mine seem to need a congressional report.
"In 1978 Nr. Robert Nathan at JPL was sufficiently impressed with the Meier photographs to have copies made of Meier transparencies at the JPL photo lab. After the transfer he refused to analyze the photographs, however, because his developer discovered they were several generations away from the originals. Nathan felt that the transparencies were so far away in generation from the photographs he had seen that Wendelle Stevens had attempted to trick him. Why were they several generations off originals if this was 1978??"
This is but one case of clear deception in the "analysis" of the images. There's also quotes from a DeAnza employee who said that he was asked to alter photos to make it appear as if the ground reflected in the "beamship" hull.
Well thats a bit dishonest. It's also called evidence tampering. This is all documented if you look past your nose.
Robert Post, JPL photo laboratory for 22 years was shown the photos. He found that they were lithographs, and worthless for analysis. When he later saw an actual photo, he stated they were much fuzzier then the lithographs.
Can you say alteration of core data again?
Post said at that point he had the feeling he was dealing with a "con man" and didnt want anything to do with it.
I think I've done far more then enough for any rational human being to get the real picture...and I aint talkin lithographs.
Originally posted by SkyWay
Has anyone else had trouble logging into this website? I haven't been able to get in here since yesterday until now. Was there a problem with the servers or something?