AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the ATS Skunk Works discussion forum.  (rss)


Lunar Strip Mine in John Lear's Moon Photos??


<<  1    2    3    4  >>

Topic started on 18-9-2006 @ 08:55 PM by SkepticOverlord


Okay, I can't stop dwelling on this damn image.

Springer and I helped prepare 5 high-res photos of the massive Copernicus lunar crater in this thread:
John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

In the course of discussion and the search for small oddities, I think something massive may have been overlooked in this image:
Copernicus2-full.gif (6.2 meg)
Copernicus2-medium.gif (900 kb)


Is it me or...



does that look exactly like a strip mining operation?


Am I crazy?



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more ATS Skunk Works topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:00 PM by johnlear


Originally posted by SkepticOverlord



Okay, I can't stop dwelling on this damn image.

Springer and I helped prepare 5 high-res photos of the massive Copernicus lunar crater in this thread:
John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

In the course of discussion and the search for small oddities, I think something massive may have been overlooked in this image:
Copernicus2-full.gif (6.2 meg)
Copernicus2-medium.gif (900 kb)


Is it me or...



does that look exactly like a strip mining operation?

Am I crazy?



No your not. Somebody is eventually going to come acroos some other indications of a full fledged mining operation which, at the time of the photograph, in 1966, was in full operation.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:01 PM by SkepticOverlord


An alternate angle from a photo on the Wiki article seems to show the same attributes of the area:
en.wikipedia.org...:Copernicus.gif



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:06 PM by marg6043


1966 but who could have been mining at that time, and can this pictures just show an area that has been like that for longer than 40 years?

Perhaps ancient mining area?

I am wondering if this pictures are truly real.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:11 PM by Mcphisto


Originally posted by johnlear
No your not. Somebody is eventually going to come acroos some other indications of a full fledged mining operation which, at the time of the photograph, in 1966, was in full operation.


It does look like an open-cast mining operation. Not to say it doesnt also look alot like a rocky outcrop!

Is this picture from the dark side of the moon? Outerwise how could you possibly expect people to believe that this was a 'working' mine in 1966 and not for people to know about it?

And if it is from the dark side, why cant we just as easily get photo's of the 7 mile high buildings you say are there, or for that matter any buildings? And I dont mean what could be-lookslike-10000yr old-ex pyramids either.


McP



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:12 PM by SkepticOverlord


Originally posted by marg6043
I am wondering if this pictures are truly real.


The source is NASA.

And with the Wiki image, we now have two different images, from different angles, through different sources, showing the same "strip-mine-like" attributes.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:15 PM by marg6043


Thanks for the clarification of the images.

Is truly fascinating, but I still believe that it can be an ancient site of some mining operations way before our time in earth perhaps.

It if was 1966 how come Is not roads or anything left behind?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:25 PM by johnlear


Originally posted by marg6043


Thanks for the clarification of the images.

Is truly fascinating, but I still believe that it can be an ancient site of some mining operations way before our time in earth perhaps.

It if was 1966 how come Is not roads or anything left behind?


Ask yourself (or ask somebody) what would be the indications if this mine was in full operation? Clouds of dust? Would there be huge piles of sloping overburden? Would there be cranes of any sort? Would there be refining facilities and if there were what would be the indications of refinement facilities? Would there be tanks containing chemicals? Would chemical reactions cause vapor to rise or fall from the top of these tanks depending on their specific gravity? Oops, never mind, there can't be any vapor on the moon, its a vacuum.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:34 PM by mikesingh


I do not think its a mining op of any kind. A mine needs to have trackways along the sides for mechanical devices to go into the dug-outs to scoop out soil.

I don't see any indications of such tracks. Or how is the soil being scooped out from the bottom? This is just a meteor which has smashed to dust on the surface.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:35 PM by SearchEngine


Mr. Lear

Well, not if they're mining Ilminite. Oxygen can be extracted
by chemical process or I also heard extreme heat.

[edit on 18-9-2006 by SearchEngine]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:44 PM by kinglizard


Just curious and hoping someone could answer this question. What could they be mining on the moon that they couldn’t mine on earth for 1/1000 the cost?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:44 PM by marg6043


Could the operations be underground?

But back in the 60s did the US had such technology as to make possible to mine in the moon?

Or to build facilities underground.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:47 PM by SteveR


The mining operations may explain the fluctuating gravity field that scientists can't explain.

A gravity map of the moon, courtesy of CDDISA, NASA. Red areas show location of the Mascons (Mass Concentrations) - unexplained areas of higher gravity which cause spacecraft orbiting the moon to "dip" towards the surface.
www.mufor.org...


Anyway, real glad to see this being taken seriously on ATS.

[edit on 18/9/06 by SteveR]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:48 PM by SteveR


Originally posted by kinglizard
Just curious and hoping someone could answer this question. What could they be mining on the moon that they couldn’t mine on earth for 1/1000 the cost?


Helium3.

ATS Google Search



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:53 PM by marg6043


johnlear

I love conspiracies and these pictures sure make a heck of a good one. I agree with your post about the moon be the way it is it will be easier to hid it.

But the pictures look too clean for the mining to still be operational unless is something missing from the picture, perhaps careful coverage.

But will NASA be showing these pictures if it was something of importance in the moon that needed be hidden?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:56 PM by kinglizard


Originally posted by SteveR
Helium3.



I see, thanks Steve.


[edit on 18-9-2006 by kinglizard]



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:57 PM by justgeneric


Can't recall how to post a pic inline...

EXTERNAL IMAGE Mineral mine

And a former coal strip mine I believe??
IMAGE

There are quite a few similarities it seems. Kinda interesting.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 09:59 PM by SteveR


Originally posted by marg6043
But will NASA be showing these pictures if it was something of importance in the moon that needed be hidden?



Well, technically.. NASA isn't showing the pictures. It's not like these are publicized ones. Remember only a few from the apollo catalog (another thread) was ever used by NASA in the media.

NASA puts these on some obscure place on it's website to fulfill it's taxpayer service.. the pictures aren't so damning that they need to be burnt (unlike alot of others unfortunately). The vast majority of people have never seen these images before. I beleive Jra is the only guy who claimed to.

[edit on 18/9/06 by SteveR]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 10:00 PM by DimensionalDetective


Originally posted by kinglizard
Just curious and hoping someone could answer this question. What could they be mining on the moon that they couldn’t mine on earth for 1/1000 the cost?


Playing devils advocate, what if the 'they' who possibly created this are not from earth? I'll probably get flamed for that, but I tend to agree with Mr. Lear that a ton of stuff has been being suppressed about what is actually on the moon. I believe some of NASA's airbrushers may have retired early due to carpal-tunnel.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 10:01 PM by marg6043


Originally posted by SteveR

Well, technically.. NASA isn't showing the pictures.


Thanks for that info I was not aware of that, so yes a heck of a conspiracy with these pictures.



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3    4  >>






























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.010 seconds
Page processed in 0.110 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]