It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Techsnow
I am trying to understand what TJ144 meant by,"There was indeed a being named Lucifer (or rather his spiritual name was close to the modern word “Lucifer”). Lucifer was created by God and he had a great spiritual potential. When God creates a being, God names that being according to his or her spiritual potential. Lucifer was given a name that means the one who has the potential to bring light, meaning that Lucifer had the potential to become the one who would awaken human beings to the light within themselves." and how he can draw this conclusion.
Originally posted by firebat
Originally posted by Techsnow
I am trying to understand what TJ144 meant by,"There was indeed a being named Lucifer (or rather his spiritual name was close to the modern word “Lucifer”). Lucifer was created by God and he had a great spiritual potential. When God creates a being, God names that being according to his or her spiritual potential. Lucifer was given a name that means the one who has the potential to bring light, meaning that Lucifer had the potential to become the one who would awaken human beings to the light within themselves." and how he can draw this conclusion.
I think I heard about this on a Coast-to-Coast relatively recently. I sorta recall aliens or Annunaki having something to do with it but I could be wrong. The whole idea of this being was that he was the light-bringer... along the same lines as the Prometheus story but that he wasn't an actual divine being, just an extra-terrestrial.
Maybe it connects in someway to Lucifer or even the being that TJ144 was talking about.. I have no idea.
Originally posted by Techsnow
We can now assume that the Roman priests probably changed the 14th chapter of Isaiah for certain reasons. The only reason Lucifer was changed to Satan is because of misstranslation by late Christians while using the original hebrew text.
So whered "lucifer" come from? This word comes from Jerome's Latin Vulgate. In Latin, "lucifer" actually means Venus as a morning star. Isaiah is using this metaphor for a bright light.
Now that everyone knows that Lucifer/Satan.. W/E... was just some Babylonian King...
Originally posted by AkashicWanderer
Hello techsnow,
Originally posted by Techsnow
We can now assume that the Roman priests probably changed the 14th chapter of Isaiah for certain reasons. The only reason Lucifer was changed to Satan is because of misstranslation by late Christians while using the original hebrew text.
The confusions we have about Lucifer and Satan are not a result of a mistranslation.
As you correctly state later in your post, Jerome was not in error when he translated the Morning Star to Lucifer, since they are interchangeable words.
The confusions that arise in Orthodox Christian theology about Lucifer and Satan are the result of viewing Satan and Lucifer as the same being. You make this same mistake at the end of your post.
So whered "lucifer" come from? This word comes from Jerome's Latin Vulgate. In Latin, "lucifer" actually means Venus as a morning star. Isaiah is using this metaphor for a bright light.
Correct, which is why Lucifer is not a mistranslation.
Now that everyone knows that Lucifer/Satan.. W/E... was just some Babylonian King...
You're making the same mistake that the Christians who first associated Satan with Lucifer made.
There is nothing in the Bible which indicates that Lucifer is Satan.
If Satan is not Lucifer then he has nothing to do with Isaiah 14:12, which means that he is not a Babylonian King.
Inverencial Peace,
Akashic
Originally posted by Techsnow
You're contradicting me and yourself.
The mistranslation came from: "heleyl, ben shachar" which can be literally translated "shining one, son of dawn." This phrase means the planet Venus when it appears as a morning star. The Jewish word heleyl means the morning star.
When they tried to translate "heleyl, ben shachar" they turned Lucifer into "shachar" or "Satan".
Originally posted by interestedalways
I must be reading something wrong because it appears that Jesus is the fallen one according to the scripture quoted from Rev.22 it said that jesus the root of david and the morning star. If the morning star fell did Jesus fall? I must be mixed up.
Originally posted by interestedalways
But how can Jesus and Lucifer and Venus all be the morning star unless they are representing the same thing?
Originally posted by interestedalways
But how can Jesus and Lucifer and Venus all be the morning star unless they are representing the same thing?
Latter... misstranslation changed the name Lucifer to the name Satan.. I explained how in earlier posts.
Originally posted by interestedalways
Thank you for the validation
Rev. 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the offspring of David and the bright morning star.
Is he saying that he is the root and the offspring or is he referring to his angel as the root and the offspring?
Are Jesus and Lucifer the same thing?
Originally posted by interestedalways
Thank you for the validation
Rev. 22:16 I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the offspring of David and the bright morning star.
Is he saying that he is the root and the offspring or is he referring to his angel as the root and the offspring?
Are Jesus and Lucifer the same thing?
Originally posted by Techsnow
The reason that people "associate Satan with Lucifer" was explained in earlier posts... the latter Christians tried to retranslate the text into a new language but in the process of the translation they changed the original Latin name of "Lucifer" into "Satan".
Originally posted by interestedalways
TechSnow, STOP IT!!!!!
I understand about the wrongful connection about Satan and Lucifer. Why can't you see my question. Why are you ignoring the Jesus part of being called the morning star? Am I not asking clearly? See my edit to the last post I made, please.