It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Schaden
When they triangulated the positions from the multiple video sources, it appeared the lights were over the city. Not behind South Mountain or anywhere else.
Wouldn't the parachutes have been found ?
Originally posted by Schaden
Additionally, a laboratory performed a spectroscoptic analysis on the lights and they were not of the same color as the type of flares used by the AF.
Originally posted by Schaden
What about Doctor Kitei's eyewitness account of multiple light "orbs" hovering less than 100 feet off her back patio ? Is she just lying ?
Originally posted by tribaltrip
if they were on parachute's i would imagine to see some sort
of swaying...
Originally posted by tayzer
Flares? U got to be kinding me...I saw this on the news a few years back and the lights where at stand still in the air. There were hundreds of witnesses that claim the lights were inert in the sky for a really long time. I don't know what they were, but to say they were flares you must be smoking crack!
UFO Phoenix Lights CNN - Google Video
Originally posted by Access Denied
Originally posted by jritzmann
Of course our end result is a bad video, and people claimign to have seen structured craft.
You mean this video?
We really dont have any effective way to say the two events arent connected...so their plan essentially worked for a captured data point of view.
Originally posted by porsche2006
How many of you actually believe that these Phoenix Lights were actual aliencrafts? I do.
(NOTE: the following analysis of March 13, 1997 sightings over Phoenix refers to the sightings by a few people of lights at about 10 PM. An earlier sighting by hundreds of people around 8:30 PM of a dark triangular object that blocked the stars was a UFO. It is not the subject of this analysis.)
Thanks for the link. After reading that article I think I understand the confusion a little better. It sounds to me like there was most likely only one event that night and the reports of a black triangular craft (all apparently with lights) were based on mistaken/exaggerated extrapolation of what the light formation (most likely flares) represented and the different vantage point/distances the various witnesses observed it from. Generally speaking, 10 people will describe the exact same event 10 different ways. Ask any cop or detective.
I imagine the first reports you heard were made before the amateur video surfaced and was broadcast and that is the “source” of the “two different” events. Seeing the video on TV likely affected subsequent eyewitness reports/interpretations. Anyway, that’s just my opinion based on everything I’ve seen so far
Originally posted by Gazrok
Jritzman, you said there was video of the earlier sighting? I must have missed this so far, at least at this stage of the investigation. Do you have a link? I haven't read the entire thread yet. Thanks.
[edit on 25-8-2006 by Gazrok]
"What I believe happened was a very large experimental aircraft took off from either White Sands or the SWC on a test flight, got into trouble and hadto make an emergency landing. "The closest Air Force Base the pilot could turn to that could accommodate a craft of it's size was Davis-Monthan AFB,south of Tucson,so he took the same route the pilots from there routinely used,hoping he wouldn't draw attention to himself. "Unfortunately,he drew alto of attention to himself and now thousands of people think he's ET."