It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Nate sent us this update: I wanted to say that many people have said that I was inside when I took this picture. I just wanted to comment that I was completely outside at the rail of the ship when I took this photo, thus eliminating any possibility of reflections of any kind.
Originally posted by Skeptik1st
if you read the article in detail at the very end the guy says he took it outside on the railing of the cruise liner so Reflection is not an option on this one guys
"Nate sent us this update: I wanted to say that many people have said that I was inside when I took this picture. I just wanted to comment that I was completely outside at the rail of the ship when I took this photo, thus eliminating any possibility of reflections of any kind".
[edit on 14-7-2006 by Skeptik1st]
Originally posted by Lost_Mind
BTW, yes I think we can rule out seagull on this one as well....
Originally posted by ArMaP
Another thing, it would help believe the intentions of the guy who took the picture if the picture still had the EXIF data, but this as been erased.
www.imaging-resource.com...
Nikon Coolpix 5900
Image Resolution: 2592x1944, 2048x1536, 1600x1200, 1024x768, 640x480
Movie Resolution: 640x480, 320x240
Originally posted by rand
Originally posted by ArMaP
Another thing, it would help believe the intentions of the guy who took the picture if the picture still had the EXIF data, but this as been erased.
Both pictures have exif data, and both have been resized from the original image size:
Originally posted by Lost_Mind
Is it possible that the only reason that the photos were modifed was to decrease image size to allow posting on C2C? Is it possible to tell from the Exif data whether there was any cropping/pasting/layering done to the images?
Is the different pixel structure around the craft on the closeup a result of resizing or insertion from another image?
I think that the closeup shows too much of a solid shape to be summarily dismissed as reflections or other vaporous apparitions.