It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xmotex
I'm not generally a huge fan of the Israeli government, but I can't really object to what Peres said. It's a simple statement of fact - Israel is almost certainly capable of reducing large chunks of Iran's landscape to irradiated rubble, and at a time when Iran's president is talking about "wiping Israel off the map" it's simple good sense to point that out.
Does Iran's President Want Israel Wiped Off The Map?
An independent translation of the original (like the version published by ISNA) yields that Ahmadinejad does not use the term 'map'. He quotes Ayatollah Khomeini's assertion that the occupation regime must vanish from this world - literally translated: from the arena of times. Correspondingly: there is no space for an occupation regime in this world respectively in this time. The formulation 'wipe off the map' used by the 'New York Times' is a very free and aggravating interpretation which is equivalent to 'razing something to the ground' or 'annihilating something'. The downwelling translation, first into English ('wipe off the map'), then from English to German - and all literally ('von der Landkarte löschen') - makes us stride away from the original more and more. The perfidious thing about this translation is that the expression 'map' can only be used in one (intentional) way: a state can be removed from a map but not a regime, about which Ahmadinejad is actually speaking.
www.informationclearinghouse.info...
Israeli Ambassador to US Calls for 'Regime Change' in Iran, Syria
The Israeli ambassador in Washington called for "regime change" in Iran and Syria on Monday through diplomatic isolation, economic sanctions and what he called "psychological pressure."
Ambassador Daniel Ayalon said the U.S. invasion of Iraq and overthrow of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein helped create great opportunities for Israel but it was "not enough."
"It has to follow through. We still have great threats of that magnitude coming from Syria, coming from Iran," he told a conference of the pro-Israeli Anti-Defamation League.
www.commondreams.org...
Originally posted by Malichai
Iran did not threaten to wipe Israel off the map.
It was mistranslated by the New York Times.
The Iran President DID INDEED say such
"'Nobody believed that we would one day witness the collapse of the Eastern Imperialism [i.e. the U.S.S.R], and said it was an iron regime. But in our short lifetime we have witnessed how this regime collapsed in such a way that we must look for it in libraries, and we can find no literature about it.
"'Imam [Khomeini] said that Saddam [Hussein] must go, and that he would be humiliated in a way that was unprecedented. And what do you see today? A man who, 10 years ago, spoke as proudly as if he would live for eternity is today chained by the feet, and is now being tried in his own country...
"'Imam [Khomeini] said: 'This regime that is occupying Qods [Jerusalem] must be eliminated from the pages of history.' This sentence is very wise. The issue of Palestine is not an issue on which we can compromise.
MEMRI
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Nobody sees the conspiracy here? I know I've described this before.
Look, Israel got nukes in the sixties, did not sign the NPT and hid their nukes for decades. THEY brought mukes to the mideast so they are complete fools to think that history will not remember this.
Does anyone in the world (who isn't a Zionist or rapturist) think this state of Israel will survive when it is they who brought nuclear weapons to their neighborhood? Seems to me that if my neighbor parked an Abrams tank in his driveway and then began building a wall across my driveway, me and him would come to blows eventually. Would anyone on the street blame me?
If they do not make peace with their neighbors, I suspect the world will hold them accountable for any nuke that goes off in the mid east.
Also will the US be held accountable, unfortunately.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Thats pretty silly. Why is israel to blame when its their neighbhors that have started multiple wars against them??? If it makes sense for the iranians to get nukes because the yehudis have them, then why shoudnt the yehudis get nukes because of the constant threat of annihilation from their neighbhors?
Also, the yehudis getting nukes probably had more than just a little bit to do with the cold war also. Nukes were already 'in the area', at least within striking distance.
If they do not make peace with their neighbors, I suspect the world will hold them accountable for any nuke that goes off in the mid east.
And what, pray tell, is the almight world going to do about it?
Also will the US be held accountable, unfortunately.
Again, what the heck is the world going to do about it? THe world was opposed to the Iraq War. All that meant was that the world didn't help. So what? How much of a difference would french troops or nigerian brigades have made???
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Israel's neighbors have started wars against them?
Israel seems to always approach the matter of their state a priori, as if it's always been there. But no, it has not.
I am saying that world sympathy will not be entirely with Israel.
However, what can be known is who intitiated the conflict.
and when history is written, and the powder keg of the mid east goes off, it will be Israel who is seen as having tried to take advantage of collaboration with the victors (and losers) of both world wars.
They wouldn't trade with them, wouldn't allow the natives to work,
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
The brits have openly said they will not participate in this war.....
Originally posted by Malichai
Iran did not threaten to wipe Israel off the map.
It was mistranslated by the New York Times.
They called for Regime Change.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Yeah, I read your link and it is one of its kind to be had or found attempting to EXCUSE the Iranian president in what he said.
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Nobody sees the conspiracy here? I know I've described this before.
Look, Israel got nukes in the sixties, did not sign the NPT and hid their nukes for decades. THEY brought mukes to the mideast so they are complete fools to think that history will not remember this.
Does anyone in the world (who isn't a Zionist or rapturist) think this state of Israel will survive when it is they who brought nuclear weapons to their neighborhood? Seems to me that if my neighbor parked an Abrams tank in his driveway and then began building a wall across my driveway, me and him would come to blows eventually. Would anyone on the street blame me?
Anyway, IMO WW3 is planned to be between Jew and Muslim so that the Abrahamists can have the globe. Simple really. In the end, it doesn't matter if Israel or Iran is nuked because afterward (if there is an afterward), the Hebrew/Islamist god, who is the same god (YHWH is Allah), will have control of the globe. This god will be in control via Sharia law or via Noahide law. They both suck for anyone who desires liberty.
Israel should apologize for bringing nukes to the mideast and cooperate with Iran so as to make peace. If they do not make peace with their neighbors, I suspect the world will hold them accountable for any nuke that goes off in the mid east. Also will the US be held accountable, unfortunately.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Israel's neighbors have started wars against them?
Yes.
Israel seems to always approach the matter of their state a priori, as if it's always been there. But no, it has not.
This is entirely irrelevant as to the matter of Israel being justified in having nukes. They have been attacked in the past, they are in hostile territory (regardless of how justified that hostility is), and therefore they are going to get nukes to use to attack their enemies.
Dimona Nuclear Reactor
[...] Its construction commenced in 1958, with French assistance. The official reason given by the Israeli and French governments was to build a nuclear reactor to power a "desalination plant", in order to "green the Negev". The purpose of Dimona is widely assumed to be the manufacturing of nuclear weapons, and the majority of defense experts have concluded that it does in fact do that. However, the Israeli government refuses to confirm or deny this publicly, as part of a policy of deliberate ambiguity.
The Dimona reactor went on-line some time between 1962 and 1964, and with the plutonium produced there, perhaps together with some enriched uranium acquired through mysterious means (see Plumbat Operation), the Israel Defence Forces most probably had their first nuclear weapons ready before the Six-Day War.
Some claim that because Israel knew the schedule of the inspectors' visits, it was able to hide the alleged purpose of the site (manufacturing of nuclear weapons) from the inspectors, by installing temporary false walls and other devices before each inspection. The inspectors eventually informed the U.S. government that their inspections were useless, due to Israeli restrictions on what areas of the facility they could inspect. In 1969, the United States terminated the inspections.
In 1986, Mordechai Vanunu, a former technician at Dimona, revealed to the media some evidence of Israel's nuclear program. Israeli agents kidnapped him from Italy, drugged him and transported him to Israel. An Israeli court then tried him in secret on charges of treason and espionage, and sentenced him to eighteen years imprisonment. At the time of Vanunu's arrest, The Times reported that Israel had material for approximately 20 hydrogen bombs and 200 fission bombs. In 2000 Israel put into service 3 advanced Dolphin class submarines built in Germany, capable of launching nuclear-armed cruise missiles [1].
I am saying that world sympathy will not be entirely with Israel.
And we're all supposed to care about that because.......?
However, what can be known is who intitiated the conflict.
So basically, you are saying that, no matter what, Israel is responsible for any wars in the region.
So why wouldn't they get nukes, and use them at liberty, whenever they feel threatened? Whats the reward for not using them?
and when history is written, and the powder keg of the mid east goes off, it will be Israel who is seen as having tried to take advantage of collaboration with the victors (and losers) of both world wars.
If there's a nuke war in the mid east between the US and Israel on one side and places like Iran and syria and arabia on the other, then the history books about ti are going ot be written by yehudis and jingoists, and certainly won't put the blame on themselves.
They wouldn't trade with them, wouldn't allow the natives to work,
The yehudi economy is based on palestinian labour, so what are you talking about?
Originally posted by smallpeeps
Nobody sees the conspiracy here? I know I've described this before.
Anyway, IMO WW3 is planned to be between Jew and Muslim so that the Abrahamists can have the globe. Simple really. In the end, it doesn't matter if Israel or Iran is nuked because afterward (if there is an afterward), the Hebrew/Islamist god, who is the same god (YHWH is Allah), will have control of the globe. This god will be in control via Sharia law or via Noahide law. They both suck for anyone who desires liberty.
Israel should apologize for bringing nukes to the mideast and cooperate with Iran so as to make peace. If they do not make peace with their neighbors, I suspect the world will hold them accountable for any nuke that goes off in the mid east. Also will the US be held accountable, unfortunately.
Originally posted by rizla
It includes a link to the speech in Persian.
www.president.ir...
Originally posted by Nygdan
I very much doubt that the yehudis have the ability ot 'wipe iran off the map', sure they have nukes and can use those, but outside of that, they dont' have the ability.
Also, the yehudis can't even control the palestinians, how could the occupy iran???
"As the Imam said, Israel must be wiped off the map," said Ahmadinejad, referring to Iran's revolutionary leader Ayat Allah Khomeini.
His comments were the first time in years that such a high-ranking Iranian official has called for Israel's eradication, even though such slogans are still regularly used at government
rallies.
english.aljazeera.net...
Originally posted by skippytjc
Israel is starting to speak up, and frankly I like it.
'Iran can also be wiped off the map'
Vice Premier Shimon Peres said Monday in an interview to Reuters that "the president of Iran should remember that Iran can also be wiped off the map," Army Radio reported.
According to Peres, "Teheran is making a mockery of the international community's efforts to solve the crisis surrounding Iran's nuclear program."
"Iran presents a danger to the entire world, not just to us," Peres added.
Peres' vehement expressions came the same day that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reportedly wrote to US President George W. Bush proposing "new solutions" to their differences in the first letter from an Iranian leader to an American president in 27 years, government spokesman Gholam-Hossein Elham said Monday.
The world needs to take its head out of the sand, the last time a world leader used the same rhetoric that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been using was in 1938 by a man called "Hitler", and we all know where that led. And remember: Hitler didnt have nuclear power or the oil reserves Iran has.
Originally posted by rizla
'The phrase he then used as I read it is "The Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] from the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)."
Ahmadinejad was not making a threat, he was quoting a saying of Khomeini and urging that pro-Palestinian activists in Iran not give up hope-- that the occupation of Jerusalem was no more a continued inevitability than had been the hegemony of the Shah's government. '