Should Holocaust denial really be a crime?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 20-2-2006 @ 02:36 PM by Klepto
I saw the news article (HERE) about that guy who got 3 years for just this!

I am aware that his comments from 1989 were ridiculaous and the fact that mass genocide must be acknowledged but this sentance is rediculous.

"I made a mistake when I said there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz," he told the court in the Austrian capital.


Surely it would make more sense to educate the ignorant to the fact. Have these people visit Auschwitz or speak to somebody who survived it. Show the many pictures readily available of people within the death camps.

I could only see this extreme sentence as being a precursor in allowing prosecution of anybody who may use the denial of holocaust as a weapon.. say Islamofascist for example.

If these people want to deny it, that is their ignorant problem. The Holocaust was not just about the extermination of Jews, it was also involved with the extermination of homosexuals and other who did not fit into the Nazi psuedo religious idealism. Link

I am not sure what basis this act is illegal?

Is it Ignorant? Yes.
Should it be punishable? I totally agree.
Is this punishment excessive? Absolutely.



reply posted on 20-2-2006 @ 11:48 PM by EntangledWiththeCat
Reminds me a little bit of the anti-mask ordinance. Here’s an article about it getting shot down in my home town.

www.rickross.com...

The anti-mask law keeps anyone above the age of 18 from wearing a hood or facial covering in public, with an exception made for religious, health, and safety reasons.
If your not afraid of showing your face, then you can assemble with your group in public (surprise, surprise, this law usually smothers open Klan activity in the areas where it's put into effect).

Like the Holocaust denial laws, this is used as a tool to suppress extremist groups. Though, if enacted in America, these Holocaust laws would infringe on our rights.

Also, here's something off of wikipedia concerning the European Convention on Human Rights.

"According to Article 17 of the Convention, nothing in the Convention may be construed so as to justify acts that are aimed at destroying any of the very rights and freedoms contained therein. "

Article 10 of their Convention gives basic freedom of speech rights, and is the article often cited by "Holocaust revisionists" in attempts to defend their actions.

My question: Does America have an equivalent to article 17?

[edit on 21-2-2006 by EntangledWiththeCat]


reply posted on 21-2-2006 @ 08:46 AM by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
Lets all remember where Holocaust denial is against the law - Austria and Germany.


Thank you for that information. I thought it was the law in the UK as well. I honestly know nothing about this so every piece of information helps. I guess it's time for some research on the subject.

Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
C'mon, even if it was not made a crime, where is your conscience?


I don't get this. My conscience is fully present. I don't deny the holicaust but I don't understand it being AGAINST THE LAW to do so. It's not against the law to deny God. It's not against the law to deny slavery. Why this particular one religion/race? And denying a part of history doesn't necessarily make a person racist.

This law reminds me of 'blanket laws', which I hate. They make an innocent action against the law in hopes of suppressing an actual crime. For example, on a small scale, kids can't wear certain colors to school because they represent one gang or another. And the other gang will get upset and start cutting people. Who's at fault here? The gang member with the knife! Not the kid who wore the red shirt.

But they suppress the kid who wore the red shirt so not to "offend" the gang member and incite him to stab! It's like suppressing the cartoon maker so as not to "offend" the radical, angry criminal who's just waiting to be incited to burn and kill.

I know Holocaust denial isn't against the law here (USA) and I'm glad. Not that I deny it, I don't. But it's a clear cut case of legislating Political Correctness and replacing the right to Free Speech. And I have a thing about that.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 18 days ago with 276 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 14 days ago with 122 member flags
Was this the real reason why Megaupload was closed down?
  Posted 18 days ago with 96 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 16 days ago with 85 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 16 days ago with 83 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 68 replies