It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Seriously, I'm afraid that makes not much sense, ArchAngel. Such an attack would be good only if a follow-up attack is used.
EMP is not used by itself, not in a real war. It might have terroristic applications, but that would not stop Israel, and it would only incur her righteous wrath.
What about their dome in Jerusalem
Originally posted by xmotex
To generate EMP effects that powerful over an area the size of Israel, the Iranians would need a large fusion weapon (megaton yield class), not a little Hiroshima-style fission bomb. Since they don't have fission weapons yet, let alone megaton-class hydrogen bombs, I don't think such a scenario is realistic.
Originally posted by Jamie6661986
Iran's President should be assinated and i would help doingit...this guy means bussiness and so does us
100 times less area with 100 times less yield at the proper altitude gives the same effect.
Originally posted by xmotex
No, actually it doesn't.
Low yield warheads do not produce enough gama rays to trigger appreciable EMP effects on the ground, this came out during arguments for using nuclear-tipped ABM's. IE: detonating small nukes at high altitudes to defend yourself from incoming warheads will not create a large enough EMP effect to destroy your own hardware on the ground.
Originally posted by xmotex
From what I understand, building an enhanced radiation weapon pretty much means building a fusion device.
Changes in the design of thermonuclear weapons could also substantially increase the energy accounted for by prompt gamma rays. One possibility is to encase the weapon with an isotope that, when it is bombarded with neutrons, emits gamma rays. In this way excess fission or fusion neutrons escaping from the weapon's core could induce the emission of gamma rays, nearly half of which would leave the expanding explosion debris. (The other half would radiate inward and be absorbed by the debris material.)
If a nuclear explosive is detonated above the atmosphere but within the earth's magnetic field, the plasma expanding in directions more or less perpendicular to the magnetic field lines will distort the field. When this happens, a large fraction of the kinetic energy in the weapon debris is converted into electromagnetic energy, resulting in the emission of a sudden burst of radiation with a broad range of wavelengths --from a few meters to hundreds of kilometers or more. Such an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) can represent a substantial fraction of the total energy of the explosion and can propagate with little attenuation through the atmosphere to the earth's surface.
Nuclear explosions in space or in the high-altitude regions of the atmosphere can produce another type of EMP. In this case gamma or high-energy X rays striking the upper part of the atmosphere cause electrons to be ejected from air molecules. Such a sudden cascade of electrons is equivalent to a huge surge of electric current. Since the current would not be spherically symmetrical (it would flow predominantly in the direction of higher air density, namely downward) and would vary with time, it would generate transient magnetic fields that in turn would produce electromagnetic radiation in the form of an EMP.
As a result of the approximately exponential increase in the density of the atmosphere with decreasing altitude, much of the energy radiated downward by a nuclear explosion above the atmosphere is deposited in the atmosphere's upper reaches. Deposition of this energy can sometimes produce severe secondary effects that then propagate to the surface of the earth. X rays and weapon debris at sufficiently high fluences (total energy per unit area) can, for example, heat the atmosphere to such high temperatures that it radiates visible light and infrared radiation. Gamma rays, neutrons and X rays released by the weapon, as well as the decay products of radionuclides, can directly or indirectly generate electric currencts in the layer of the atmosphere where they deposit their energy. These currents can then generate other EMP's whose wavelengths and instantaneous power levels extend over a very wide range. Heating of the atmosphere can also initiate complex chemical reactions that affect its transmission and reflection of radio waves.
Third Generation Weapons
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
the real "fairy tale" is anyone on ATS that thinks they know for certain what Iran has in its arsenal or its future plans.....
.....Everyone can make a guess or form a opinion from current known facts but thats not even close to certain either way.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 2, 2005; Page A01
A major U.S. intelligence review has projected that Iran is about a decade away from manufacturing the key ingredient for a nuclear weapon, roughly doubling the previous estimate of five years, according to government sources with firsthand knowledge of the new analysis.
The carefully hedged assessments, which represent consensus among U.S. intelligence agencies, contrast with forceful public statements by the White House.
Iran already has 164 centrifuge machines installed at its pilot centrifuge plant at Natanz, but that is only a fifth of the total it needs before it is fully operational.
Ahmadinejad won the rigged Iranian elections last year with a promise to stand up for the little man against the Islamic Republic's corrupt elite. Faced with a choice between sticking to his word and carrying on with despotism, he showed his true colours by allowing the most ferocious crackdown Tehran has seen since the religious authorities crushed dissident journalists and students in 1999....
.....Iran has seen all the stunts before because it has endured Islamism longer than any other country. Cheeringly, the old tricks no longer appear to be working.
The Associated Press's reporter said that about 400 people demonstrated outside the Danish embassy in Tehran last week, most of them state employees obeying orders, according to the Iranian opposition.
Originally posted by Bozorgh
I don't believe this source,
Originally posted by Bozorgh
I don't believe this source
I read from this that gamma radiation can indeed be enhanced.
A non-conventional response by the US against a country in the face of an attack of this sort would require absolute proof or it would suffer world condemnation.
I'm not saying this is an ordained forgone conclusion it is one of the worst possibilities that could happen.
Events of late remind me very much of the years preceding the start of WWII.