It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The NWO wants to kill all white males

page: 2
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 5 2006 @ 10:32 AM
link   
funny sum1 should say this...

everywhere I've been I've been discriminated against by someone or another

(by the way I'm biratial)




posted on Feb, 6 2006 @ 08:31 PM
link   
not sure if this theory has been covered , but heres my spin.

1. Yes the illuminati wishes to eliminate whites and there fore illuminating the white race

2 yes the illuminati is run by white males


So why than you asks? Now that’s a great question.

Once the illuminati have achieved its goals they will have complete control over the remaining populous. .These nice folks will and do have access the new life extensions and genetic engineering technologies .They will become as gods and wish to be regarded as such.



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 01:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ralph_The_Wonder_Llama
Here are the rules:

1. If you apply to graduate school / medical school / law school and you are an equal candidate with someone else, if you are a white male, you will not be chosen

2. If you apply for a contract with a government agency, and the majority of your company's stock is owned by white males, you will not be chosen

3. It's racist to draft non-white males. It's not racist to draft white males. Women cannot be drafted, but still get to vote for some reason.

My dentist had a 3.8 GPA when he got his bachelor's degree, and he had to pay his own way through dentistry school. A lot of the girls in there had less than a 3.0 GPA, but they still got full-ride scholarships anyway because they were women.

For the Washington/Oregon State Procurement Contract for medical supplies, the current Contract Holder (The Glove Lady as she calls herself) was outbid by another company. They were awarded the contract and were ready to start selling to the state. She went to the State Supreme Court and overturned the contract award on the basis that she was a non-white woman, and by awarding the contract to the white men who had EARNED IT FAIRLY, she was being unconstitutionally oppressed. I have no documentation to back this up - I am in the medical supply business for now, and this happened to another guy my supplier was selling to.

Anyway, I don't believe in the NWO, but for those of you that do, feel free to play this this idea.

Are you crazy? I've had it with this "Racism" stuff, I dont support either "Race" because its quite apparent that you DONT have too be white too be a racist, I'm sorry and I dont meen any offense, but there is no one sided Racism fight. Both Races should just keep their mouth closed, infact this entire White Black thing is the problem, if you say White or Black, you arent being racist but you are agervating it.

Deny Ignorance



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 03:45 AM
link   
Ok, although I find this thread ridiculous, I've been hanging around, just trying to figure out what this Ralph_The_Wonder_Llama could possibly mean.

I figured out that this whole thing is related to the (barely even started) proverbial levelling of the playing field.

Personal story: I went to a mostly white boarding prep school, and through a weird happenstance, I ended up 'borrowing' a white girl's also white boyfriend, and then, getting into her first choice college. It had been one of my 'backups', I didn't even want to go there. She was furious, fuming. I thought that she was more angry with me for being black, and doing those things, than for simply doing them. She felt violated in some way, like, who the hell was I to compete and win? I felt bad, but considering the way she was acting, like she was just itching to say the n-word, I must admit, I ended up enjoying it.

It would make sense if white males started to feel the way the girl in my story did.


Originally posted by ViolatoR
To go along with your medical storys, heres one I read about.
I remember reading about several doctors who got into medical school with such bad grades, but because of the particular shade of skin they had, they were helped to advance. One doctor killed almost all of his patients through total ineptness, even bringing them home so people wouldnt see how badly his patients were being hurt. Only one lived after losing lots of blood, he brought this person back to the hospital after a few weeks stay at this house. This doctor had been given his degree and job through affermative action, over more qualified persons whose skin color was not quite what the hospital was looking for.


Please, oh please, provide a souce for this.



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 03:56 AM
link   
lmao....maybe I should send you some 'statistics' that prove otherwise....what a load of crock...you wouldn't happen to be from South Africa by any chance? Maybe your one of the persecuted that has been driven off your farm...

really funny...hilarious

oh sorry had to edit to include an after thought: I think this is more an illustration of equal opportunity thanks to the RD Act 1975 and social attitudes regarding race...



[edit on 7-2-2006 by NJE777]



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 05:17 AM
link   
Wait a second, pls..


Do you know what 'affirmative action' is? do you think it's OK to punish contemporary individuals for the deeds of their ancestors, and collectively to boot? 'Reverse Discrimination' ISN'T, can't you see that? not that i cared very much (just a minor problem compared to the usual ), but i think such a blatantly open disregard for the principle of equality will cause many unpleasant reactions, simple as that.

Iustitia Regnorum Fundamentum

roughly means justice is the foundation of government

PS: certain minorities make a better living on average than whites, is anything wrong with that? of course not, so why bother just for historical reasons?



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 05:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke


Originally posted by ViolatoR

I remember reading about several doctors who got into medical school with such bad grades, but because of the particular shade of skin they had, they were helped to advance. One doctor killed almost all of his patients through total ineptness, even bringing them home so people wouldnt see how badly his patients were being hurt. Only one lived after losing lots of blood, he brought this person back to the hospital after a few weeks stay at this house. This doctor had been given his degree and job through affermative action, over more qualified persons whose skin color was not quite what the hospital was looking for.

Rubbish. Unless you can back this up with some evidence I am going to presume you made it up.


Its sickening to me that you actually think I would make things up in my spare time so I could post them anonymously on message boards and fufill some secret desire to lie to random people late at night from the comfort of my home, far far away from people who demand proof of everything I've ever read in the news in my entire life.

At the time I read this news article, I was reading wnd.com and newsmax alot, and that is probably where it came from. This was at least a couple of years ago, however, and I didnt think it was necessary to commit the source to memory just to one day "prove" it to some random idiot who doesnt believe special treatment goes on in America.

Heres a fact: it does happen. "All animals are created equal, but some are more equal then others." This line from Animal Farm basically sums up the racist laws that do in fact exist in America. Racial quotas are now illigal, but Universitys have admitted to having a broader access for "minorities." In fact one major buzzword at the American institutions is "Diversity." Of course if you are religious or conservative you will find out quite quickly that they are looking for a diversity in appearance only, not a diversity of opinions. Law schools do in fact give extra points on exams based on a persons skin color, it has been addmitted. I believe at the time I read this, they gave 20% extra to a final test score.

Heres a random article on harvard.


Cambridge's newest tax... will cost Harvard $5 million per year for the next decade. According to the Harvard Crimson, "Part of the money will fund 40 new faculty appointments over the next five years, 'with priority given to the hiring of women and underrepresented minorities,' according to the report from the Task Force on Women Faculty."

If diversity is the overall goal of the university, then Harvard has a lot of work to do. After all, the Committee on Degrees in Studies of Women, Gender and Sexuality doesn't look like a very welcoming place for males. There are 25 faculty members on the committee and exactly one male: Professor Bradley S. Epps. Shocking, simply shocking.


Heres a random article about schools forced indoctrination of kids into race-based groups.

A 12-year-old junior-high student (Kevin Weston) in Loveland, Colo., was removed from his classroom and escorted to a special club for Hispanic students meeting on campus during school hours without parental notification or consent, charges the boy's parents.

Heres what the kids parents think. An obvious polar-opposite to the racially-focused schools.
The Westons disagree with separation of people based on race. Mr. Weston said people would have problems with a white student organization.
"That's divisive, that's not inclusive," he remarked, adding, "I have a problem with any organization that forms itself on the basis of somebody's race. From a legal perspective, it's no different than the KKK coming into the school and recruiting white kids."



Heres another random article about when official racial quotas were done away with, and the start of using last names to determine how "diverse" an individual is.


Judith Winston, the U.S. Education Department's general counsel, said that applying the same set of academic standards to whites and blacks for admission to universities is discriminatory. (Excuse me?? how is equal standards discriminatory??)

"Particular race-neutral criteria (meaning standardized test scores and grade comparisons) can have a discriminatory effect," she said.

She made the comments in the context of discussing the University of California's recent policy of discounting the race, ethnicity and gender of applicants -- a change adopted by the university regents and overwhelmingly endorsed by the state's voters in their approval of Propsition 209, which sought to end quotas and preferences in government hiring, contract awards and other official business.

(The author of the this article continues


When the University of California decided to end the official racism that was guiding its admissions policy, the race-preference cartel, in the form of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund and other like-minded groups, filed a complaint with the federal government. These professional agitators, who wield power only through their ability to secure from government special privileges for their constituents, contend that the use of academic performance as the main standard for entry into the university "results in substantial exclusion of qualified minority applicants."

Qualified? Who better to determine qualifications than the university itself? And what better means of determining who's qualified than by evaluating test scores and grades?

By the way, the university still gives preferential consideration to individuals who overcome the disadvantages of a lower socio-economic background. Officials just don't consider the skin color, the last name or the sex of the student as a factor in determining admission.


This brings me to a personal story. One summer while looking fora job, I noticed how rare "college-student" type jobs were becomming. You know, during the summer all the students get a part time job until school starts again. Anyways I had applied to 5 or 6 different places, all places that are usual for my type of situation. These places usually depend on the summer job boom to fill their ranks. Anyways I had applied at most of these places before, including The Home Depot. The Home Depot is very hard to get into, Im not sure why, but I had applied at least 3 times before. This time The Home Depot was the only business to actually call me back! Imagine my suprise. It was such a rareity, I was in total shock that they were the only ones to call back. Well, after a few seconds of shock I remembered the only difference in the Home Depot job application from my other applications. I had used my mothers maiden name. This name happens to be Columbian and has a very spanish sound, most americans will assume its mexican. This was the only difference in all my applications, and the only difference in this home depot app. when compared to the other times I applied there. It seems, to me at least, that my last name was the deciding factor in my ability to get a job.

This was my own personal joke, or rather sociological experiment. Whether or not my name was truely a deciding factor for the job, we'll never know. We know that businesses are afraid of being sued by Jesse Jackson and other Demagogues (whom we were warned about by Booker T. Washington, who is a forgotten great black leader). Jesse Jackson sued a company and in the process got his relative a 6-figure job at that same company, a job his relative has absolutely no experience in. This is how it works. You have to "look diverse" first and foremost, and if at all possible, suppresse dissenting ideas (and truely not be diverse). If you dont, you will be sued and made to look diverse, publicly humiliated, and you will be forced to donate to Jacksons Rainbow Coalition or other mafia-front to avoid being sued again.

Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others atually keep racial problems alive for their own gain. Al Sharpton became famouse after a black girl was raped by "white business men" who wrote 'n-word' on her body. It turns out this whole stroy was a fabrication from Sharpton, and 2 black men raped the girl. Nevertheless he is still a self appointed black leader who profits from the continued separation of americans into "minorities" for the sole purpose of pitting one group against another. If the black community as a whole realized they are being manipulated by the same political party that supported slavery and segregation in the first place, they could stand against their oppressors and demagogues and join myself and the other Americans in battling for true equality based not on color, but merit. A country without insert-color-here-Americans, and just Americans.



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 07:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by ViolatoR
Its sickening to me that you actually think I would make things up in my spare time so I could post them anonymously on message boards and fufill some secret desire to lie to random people late at night from the comfort of my home, far far away from people who demand proof of everything I've ever read in the news in my entire life.


Don't post random gibberish about black Drs being so incompetent that they kill all their patients then. Your posts reek of barely suppressed racism, and you seem to have deep personal issues relating to non-white people. Provide some links and references if you want us to believe your little tales.

Oh boo hoo, the poor white male



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 09:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Long Lance
First, the make sure minorities get preferential treatment, which means


  • the majority will slowly learn to hate them

  • minorities themselves will by and large lose their ability to live without preferential treatment - making them dependent and controllable



The goal? somehow erase the Nazi experience from the planet's conscience by offering contemporary fabricated 'evidence' that these minorities are subhuman and inferior, therefore valid targets of extermination policies (add your fav. nat'l emergency for pretext here)

That's at least my best guess.


So what you're saying is that the goal is to lull minorities into a false sense of acceptance before the noose is tightened? Interesting.



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ralph_The_Wonder_Llama
..

So what you're saying is that the goal is to lull minorities into a false sense of acceptance before the noose is tightened? Interesting.



That's just reverse logic


It's the only thing that makes some sense, the NWO want to be filthy rich, and they can't just switch to China or India for exploitation without a backup of some sort, which at this time is still The West®. They can't just kill the cash cow, now can they?



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 01:11 PM
link   
What he is describing is called Affirmative Action. it is not as prevelant as it once was, but it is still applied in many situations. This is especially true with Federal jobs who must comply to specific EEO reporting of jobs.

If there was a entry level hjob opening and you took a married white guy, a single black guy, an American eskimo and 3 hispanic women, I would guarantee the 2 guys would be walking home. There are quotas to meet and fill or the ACLU or other rights movements we be on you.

The NWO, if that is what you call it, is the business conglomerate you work for and pay for with your hard earned cash(funny huh). It is your car payment for the SUV you can't afford, or the second mortgage to buy your kids clothes. The cable TV that portrays American dads as dumb or abusive, the children as obscene and the wife who won;t stand behind her husband. Basic family values have eroded to a point that our children learn everything from computers and TV, and we let it happen. Why, because we are too busy working to pay for our..do you see the cycle?

They want to kill noone, but control everyone. Dependance is the key to the future Big Business in America, and they know it.



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 01:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by Long Lance

  • the majority will slowly learn to hate them

  • minorities themselves will by and large lose their ability to live without preferential treatment - making them dependent and controllable



Interesting angle on affirmative action, I never saw it that way. But I can see it happening though.

That second point you made, a true, real-life case of it can be found in my country, Malaysia. Here, malays are given affirmative action of sorts and I fear that now they've pretty much lost their ability to be competitive (at least the majority of them).

Just take a stroll in any street in the capital Kuala Lumpur, try to count how many shops you can see that are owned by malays. Very close to zero.

Anyway back on topic - nah they're not oppressing you whities, they're just doing affirmative action on the non-whites.



posted on Feb, 7 2006 @ 10:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by ViolatoR
Its sickening to me that you actually think I would make things up in my spare time so I could post them anonymously on message boards and fufill some secret desire to lie to random people late at night from the comfort of my home, far far away from people who demand proof of everything I've ever read in the news in my entire life...This was at least a couple of years ago, however, and I didnt think it was necessary to commit the source to memory just to one day "prove" it to some random idiot who doesnt believe special treatment goes on in America.


People will only say that you're making it up if you don't provide a link. That is one of the things that makes this forum so great! The time wasted typing this, and the sarcastic effort expended, could have been better used searching for a source.
BTW, just through a glance at their home pages, neither looked exactly reputable.


Originally posted by ViolatoR
Heres a random article on harvard.


Cambridge's newest tax... will cost Harvard $5 million per year for the next decade. According to the Harvard Crimson, "Part of the money will fund 40 new faculty appointments over the next five years, 'with priority given to the hiring of women and underrepresented minorities,' according to the report from the Task Force on Women Faculty."



Keyword: underrepresented.


Originally posted by ViolatoR
Heres a random article about schools forced indoctrination of kids into race-based groups...
Heres what the kids parents think. An obvious polar-opposite to the racially-focused schools.
" From a legal perspective, it's no different than the KKK coming into the school and recruiting white kids."


I try so hard not to be rude, ever, on this site, but can I just say, HA! Have you ever heard of a school- based ethnic organization lynching anybody? (literally, not figuratively.) Okay then... so until "La Alianza" starts maiming and killing people, you could refrain from comparing them to the Klan.


Originally posted by ViolatoR
"Judith Winston, the U.S. Education Department's general counsel, said that applying the same set of academic standards to whites and blacks for admission to universities is discriminatory." (Excuse me?? how is equal standards discriminatory??)


Let me remind you, there was no Golden Age of Merit. So-called "equal standards" is what got us all into this mess. For some reason, "equal standards" in this country meant that, while my grandmother was equally qualified to pay the taxes to support the state university, she was not equally qualified to attend. The "equal standards" at that time did not allow her to attend because of her color.

You may not see that as recent enough to "count" for you, but because she was not afforded the education that she paid for, her earning potential, minus taxes for things she could not herself enjoy, was negligible. That, of couse, limited the likelihood that my own mother would attend, and so on... That cycle persists today for many African-Americans. I can't speak for anyone else, because I really wouldn't know, I could only guess.


Originally posted by ViolatoR
Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and others atually keep racial problems alive for their own gain.


I actually do agree with you about Jackson and Sharpton profitting from this whole race problem, but I don't think they "actually keep [those] problems alive." Racism, discrimination, and other social inequities existed long before they were born, and will likely exist long after they're gone.


Originally posted by ViolatoR
If the black community as a whole realized they are being manipulated by the same political party that supported slavery and segregation in the first place...


So... you think black Americans would be better off with the Republicans? Do you have any type of evidence, or even a decent hypothesis, that could possibly convince me?


Originally posted by ViolatoR
...they could stand against their oppressors and demagogues and join myself and the other Americans in battling for true equality based not on color, but merit. A country without insert-color-here-Americans, and just Americans.


If that were the case, I would totally join. However, it's not. Whereas other sucessful American social movements (ie, Abolition, Universal Suffrage, Civil Rights, Women's Rights, and LGBT Rights) attempted to build on those that came before, from what you've said and the sources you cite, it would seem that the movement you're a part of is more focussed on taking away the gains other movements have made.

Incidentally, I love how some white Americans tell themselves that they've succeeded in life only on merit. I mean, assuming that every race has an equal amount of smart people and stupid people, aren't the stats on race and poverty a little skewed? Its obvious that there was lots of partiality in the past. If anybody ever had reason to think they, alone, were the target of the NWO, it would have been black Americans back then. Personally, I think it sucks that almost as soon as we get out of practical, if not official, slavery, here comes the NWO!

I believe in the NWO, but when it comes to their 'wanting to kill all white males', I will remain skeptical. I just felt that it was neccessary for people to refute this. I would hate for any demographic to splinter itself off from the minority of Americans who even know about all this NWO stuff in the first place. It will take our combined forced to even have a small chance of winning.

[edit on 7-2-2006 by HarlemHottie]



posted on Feb, 8 2006 @ 09:01 AM
link   
The NWO does not want want to kill ANY males, as we are slaves. Modern day slaves that are held in position by poor eductaion, menial wages and commercialism. However, the more money you earn, the bigger your bills, and you become even more of a slave. They play off your insecurity of not "having what the other guy has". 60 plasma...H2 and H3 for the wife..

Just as every ignorant redneck blasts us back to the 1890's when he uses racial slurs, so does black America. I have recieved reverse racism many times in job situations and even in stores. Most of Black America feels that they are owed something for bieng black, and most of white America feels they deserve something for bieng white. They are both incorrect. This is 2006, and if you push yourself, there is nothing you cannot accomplish, no matter you color. If you disagree, you are scared. Get a job at Wendy's a wipe down tables.

However, the NWO recognizes this and controls us all and pits us against each other. If we ever realized we could join together, we could change alot in this country. But through media, TV or music, we are controlled on a daily basis. I mean, according to TV, all white guys are computer geeks and everyblack guy out there puts 22's on a pinto and all mexicans work on farms.

In order to change our current government and social situation, you have to first

1. find yourself, beginning with a core set of beliefs, and never stray from them.
2. Do not quote other people, quote yourself.
3. Stop blaming (insert a president) for everything
4. Be a leader, not a follower
5. Do not by into any agenda, and make you own

Stop doing what they want, and you can escape their control.


Now, if I was 16 or 17 right now, or in my early 20's. I would start to worry about a draft though. That is how the NWO cleanses its ranks.



posted on Feb, 8 2006 @ 01:02 PM
link   
Here in the States the emasculation of males is certainly on the rise. Television and movies as well as print advertising portray particularly white males as being childish and crude. The percentages of gay influenced tv progamming is to the point of nausea. I have to laugh when I hear minorities chastise whites for making these claims. Just like many whites are incapable of seeing true racial inequities of blacks and hispanics the same is true in reverse aparantly!



posted on Feb, 8 2006 @ 01:58 PM
link   
It's impossible to imagine a society which isn't sensetive when it comes to racial/discriminatory issues. Different racial conflicts seem to be everywhere, like timebombs ready to blow up because of the smallest offensive slip. Like the issue with the Danish cartoon that was published.



posted on Feb, 8 2006 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by YIAWETA
Here in the States the emasculation of males is certainly on the rise.


You might be right about this, but I don't think its because the NWO has it out for you guys... I think its more likely the result of a rising divorce rate and the Womens' Rights movement. As women began to take on the traditionally male roles of primary breadwinner and head of household, its only natural that the change would be reflected in our media.


Originally posted by YIAWETA
Just like many whites are incapable of seeing true racial inequities of blacks and hispanics the same is true in reverse aparantly!


Awww, I don't think that's true, but I do think that the people supporting the original thesis of this thread are overstating their case a bit.

Say you're an only child, and your parents shower you with attention. You're ecstatic, but you're also a little spoiled. Then, they bring home a new baby, and you have to share their attention. Of course, anybody would be upset, but doesn't the new baby have the right, even the need, to be nurtured, just like you were?



posted on Feb, 8 2006 @ 04:19 PM
link   
Hottie , as usual you're even handed in your response. I would ask you to look harder at the Women's movement in this country ,something I backed whole heartedly through the 70"s. I believe Betty Friedan was in fact a tool or was duped by the NWO to assist them in fracturing the American family unit based upon the auspices of fair wage and equal opportunity. She and other leaders of the movement may well have had great intentions, but the song they sang was music to the NWO's ears.


RaV

posted on Feb, 8 2006 @ 06:00 PM
link   
FFS!
Im getting really annoyed with my country. I live in South Africa and I am not a racist but here if you are a white male, good luck. For an example, no matter how hard you try you cannot get into medicine if you are a white male. Affirmative action. I need a degree with honours to be favoured over a non-white person who just scraped a diploma. I know the rest of the world knows how bad aparteid was back in the day but why must my generation be punished for something I had no involvement in. Equality my @$$.

I watched the amazing race the other night, the one where they visit Johannessburg. All they did was run around Soweto - a giant dust field filled with houses made from tin boards. Poor and underprivelidged people everywhere. Not one white person in sight. This is how the rest of the world sees us. Depressing. Now I understand why foreigners ask me if I have a lion in my garden or they are shocked to find out there are white people in South Africa. Anyway we do normal stuff like you guys like go to the movies, surf the net or go to restaurants. We got nice roads and cars too!

Before I forget, its ZIMBABWE where white people are being kicked off their farms, but its gonna start happening soon here . . .



posted on Feb, 8 2006 @ 07:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by YIAWETA
Hottie , as usual you're even handed in your response.


Thank you so much! I really do try to be.


Originally posted by YIAWETA
I believe Betty Friedan was in fact a tool or was duped by the NWO to assist them in fracturing the American family unit based upon the auspices of fair wage and equal opportunity. She and other leaders of the movement may well have had great intentions, but the song they sang was music to the NWO's ears.


I actually think you're right about that. I've said it many times myself, the feminist movement did very little to help women gain equality. Women have always worked outside the home, for low wages, when the financial situation of the household warranted it, but after the movement, all women were obligated to work, for those same low wages, plus all the housework women always had to do... I think I got a raw deal.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join