The Bible is not the word of god, page 30
Pages: <<  27    28    29    30    31    32  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 23-3-2006 @ 12:25 PM by saint4God
Originally posted by Prot0n
It's still just opinion. The Christian god has not been proven to exist anymore then the Egyptian god Horus or Osiris.


Not to you yet, no. But, it's a step you'd have to take. Nobody can take it for you. I'll help for those wishing it but will not impose help...that's an oxymoron. In Peter's writing, he emphasizes it is not opinion, that he himself witnessed it. Again, he's not the only one who gives testimony/witness/testament. I have a witness and testimony, but if you cannot accept the Bible as a written testament, then I cannot possibly expect you to accept my witnessing either.

Originally posted by Prot0n
You've not displayed any fact's, just personal opinion's and pre-assumption's.


Hehe, again, things not proven by you. And that's fine. I'm not going to try to force proof. Again, an oxymoron.

Originally posted by Prot0n
This pre-assume's your concept of god is the one true god, but again this can be highly debated. Crack open a history book. Take the time to learn about what civilizations came first, what their belief's were. Intellectual laziness is not a way of gaining wisdom.


One more assumption that I haven't "cracked open a history book", am intellectually lazy, and/or ignore wisdom and I shall leave you to wallow in your own musings. I'd hate to leave you in that state but see no other alternative.

Originally posted by Prot0n
I'm not sure I'm following you here. Are you admitting to not bothering looking up the hebrew words for young woman and virgin? Would you like me to do this for you so we don't have to trouble ourselve's with learning?


You're on your own friend. God be with you.



reply posted on 23-3-2006 @ 12:30 PM by saint4God
Originally posted by Enkidu
I'm still not quite sure what is meant by the term "God." Who or what it is.


Even those who know God cannot possibly encompass all that God is. The Book gives some great description and detail which helps. Don't want to go to the Book? Don't have to, you can dial him direct. Be not surprised though if He sends you to the Book to do homework. This is what happened to me.

Originally posted by Prot0n
A quick flip through the Bible does offer some instances where a character, someone or something called "God" or "The Lord," is quoted. But it's used in so different instances, and indicates many different kinds of persons or entities. Sometimes God is friendly, sometimes destructive,


But not unjustly destructive. There are many characteristics of God...just as there are many words to describe you. Yes, "God is love" but it also says "Yet He will not allow the guilty to go unpunished."

Originally posted by Prot0n
sometimes completely clueless.


I don't follow.

Originally posted by Prot0n
Anyway, I'm not quite sure you could call the whole book "The Word of God." Maybe portions of it where he or it is quoted could be called the words of God, but not the whole book.

But I doubt that God, whatever that might be, actually sat down and wrote it.


I never saw that claim in the Bible, nor by anyone who has read it.

Originally posted by Prot0n
And as far as it being "inspired" by God, well, you know that's really not the same thing. People get things wrong all the time.


Check with Him for any and all parts you're uncertain of. One way or another, you'll get your answer.


reply posted on 30-3-2006 @ 01:00 PM by Il Papa
As I see it the biggest problem for all the abrahamic belief systems is its recording.
They all depend on a third party or parties writing down oral traditions. Stories repeated and the meaning more and more lost. Our own experiences would prove the corruption of oral information by “Chinese whispers” after just a few persons imparting the information.

Add to that the difficulties associated with translation of any of the texts to any of a multitude of languages and the fact that any scribe will always write with their own bias.
It has to be said that the few texts that have survived were not written at the time of the events.
Literacy was not a common thing in ancient times the powers knew the power it held. Costly education usually funded by the wealthy could be guaranteed to say what the paymaster wanted to say. There would have been no freedom of speech; you would be commissioned to write what you were told.

So basically you have an oral tradition, which could be a fairy tale, passed on by Chinese whispers for many years. This is then written down after variable periods of time in many languages, with translations into modern languages, with the pitfalls that has.

These abrahamic belief systems seem to have selected the appropriate texts and disregarded others that did not support the respective paymasters point of view.

For those that believe in god I cannot understand your defence of it. You seem to believe it is the creator of all. Following from that shouldn’t you embrace all of his creation?? If he/she/it is the creator then surely evil and Satan are your gods creation too? You may state free will is there to test us. But really what is the point of it; if ultimately your jealous god will smite you if you don’t do as your told??

Personally I feel that fans of god, who try to convert the likes of myself, have something to hide. If this entity were all-powerful why would it need humble humans fighting on its behalf?? That’s like the wimpy kids in the playground standing up for the bully.

I feel that religion is root to a lot of the evil in the world. It has always has been so. Whether it’s murdering first-born children or the robbing, raping and genocide of the people of the Indus in the name of conversion or enlightenment.

If there is a god, and I do say if, I think his agents and followers have more to fear than the unbelievers, with what you have done in its, your gods name. If there is a god, he/she/it may be a thoroughly good chap. Perhaps god shouldn’t be blamed for the ills of man in its name. But then god wouldn’t be god would it??


reply posted on 2-4-2006 @ 07:14 PM by saint4God
Originally posted by Il Papa
It is amusing that this tosh,


Sorry you're not able to make sense of it. Please let me know if I can help.

Originally posted by Il Papa
the so called scriptures,


They are scriptures whether you consider them facts or not:

www.m-w.com...

Originally posted by Il Papa
is used in courts of law around the world for people to swear on, to testify their statement is truth. This series of unsubstantiated fables and fairy stories is but heresay.


Again, sorry you're not able to substantiate them.

Originally posted by Il Papa
Heresay is not admisable in most global courts but you testify your lies are the truth by swearing on books that are heresay??


The courts don't believe the Bible is heresay else, as you say, they wouldn't use it would they?

Originally posted by Il Papa
This so called god moves in confusing ways, does he not??


To us He is confusing, sure. To Him, makes perfect sense. Since we're not perfect, hard for us to understand perfect sense. Makes sense?

Originally posted by Il Papa
Using any novel as the sole evidence of the existence of a character within it, is nonsense. Just because Pinochio is in a book doesnt mean he exists does it?


I see. I take it you have neither researched nor applied the Bible then?

[edit on 2-4-2006 by saint4God]


reply posted on 3-4-2006 @ 04:32 PM by saint4God
Originally posted by Il Papa
saint4god

Just because e.g. western establishment has evolved


Hehe, we do like to use that word don't we?

Originally posted by Il Papa
from the evil that was the Holy Roman Emperor (founded on slavery is that an evil??) and logically uses the fairy story that begat christianity as its foundation of law and belief doesnt make it right.


This is the first time I've heard Christianity to be founded by the Holy Roman Emperor(?). Do you have any support for this claim?

Originally posted by Il Papa
The whole abrahamic fable is nonsense and of course you cant substantiate the counter view because the abrahamic view cant be substantiated in the first place.


I have documentation (as well as a personal relationship but that cannot be submitted as proof here). Do you?

Originally posted by Il Papa
I am sure this god thing, IF it did exist, would be big enough to look after itself.


Indeed He can and does. Did you think we look after him?

Originally posted by Il Papa
It wouldnt need people like you


Tell me more about me. I'm most interested in learning more about myself.

Originally posted by Il Papa
ingratiating themselves and trying to convert t'others...


I could not convert anybody, nor would I want to. I have no need to ingratiate myself.

Originally posted by Il Papa
like the church did to those native peoples in South America...murdered in your gods name.


A clear indication of hypocrisy, something Christ warns us about.

Exodus 20:13
"You shall not murder"

It should be apparent that those who murder are violating God's command.

Originally posted by Il Papa
If it, this god entity existed and allowed this sort of thing (and it aint the only time its allowed this is it?) then as a compassionate human I would want no part of it.


I see, so you want to dictate what God allows. What does that make you?

Originally posted by Il Papa
You stick with your abrahamic fairy tale and I will stick with my humanity.


I don't go by fairy tales, sorry. And, I hope for the best with humanity saving you. They've not gotten eternal life for anyone yet so far. Odds are not looking good.

Originally posted by Il Papa
As for swearing on a fairy tale in court, I would rather take oath on a copy of Pinochio, than heresay, anytime.


I'd not take an oath under either. Fortunately for me, the Bible isn't heresay.

Originally posted by Il Papa
But the holy roman empire wont allow it.


Newsflash, there is no Holy Roman Empire at present so feel free to act without fear of their intervention.

"The Holy Roman Empire (official name: sacrum romanum imperium, 1254; more details below) designates a political entity that covered a large portion of Europe, centered on Germany, from 962 to 1806. "
www.heraldica.org...

Originally posted by Il Papa
Stone tablets, burning bushes, necromantic worship sounds more like astory from JKRowling to me.


There was no encouragement for necromantic worship, rather warning against it.

[edit on 3-4-2006 by saint4God]

Pages: <<  27    28    29    30    31    32  >>    ^^TOP^^



I Am Christ-The Almighty!
  Posted 12 days ago with 12 member flags
The Pope\'s Advice for ATS (and others)
  Posted 18 days ago with 10 member flags
God\'s Judgment on homosexuality.
  Posted 14 days ago with 10 member flags
The Bringer of Light
  Posted 11 days ago with 10 member flags
Christ! My Hero!
  Posted 7 days ago with 9 member flags
WTF just happend to me?
  Posted 4 days ago with 9 member flags
End of the world, You should start paying attention! WW3
  Posted 10 days ago with 8 member flags
I am (fill in the blank).
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags