It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
The folks who wrote those books did so as witnesses to history.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
well, normally that's because those stories were passed down by word of mouth for many generations before they were written. a lot gets lost when you play a game of telephone over time.
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
well, normally that's because those stories were passed down by word of mouth for many generations before they were written. a lot gets lost when you play a game of telephone over time.
This is a gross underestimation of the abilities of the Hebrew people to record history.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
NO, it's not.
it's actually common knowledge that the scriptures weren't recorded originally. also, because of all the times the hebrew people had to relocate, they wouldn't be able to carry scripture, so they memorized it.
Originally posted by madnessinmysoul
also, when do you think they started writing the scripture down? (approximate year please)
Originally posted by Fromabove
Atheists debunk God because they are afraid of Him. They fear having to answer for the wrongs they do. They know that God is real but they have to deny Him.
How did atoms floating around in the primordial soup suddenly say, let us become a thing and think and know and then make copies and continue ?
Any answers from the Unbelievers out there......
Fromabove
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
saying the bible is the word of god is
the same of saying mein kampf is the word of god
Originally posted by bigdanprice
1.1 Theorem
God does not exist.
Originally posted by bigdanprice
Proof
Consider the notion of an omnipotent and benign God
Originally posted by bigdanprice
and his willingness to eliminate “evil”.
Either:
(i) He is willing, but unable – therefore He is not omnipotent;
Originally posted by bigdanprice
(ii) He is able, but unwilling – therefore He is malevolent;
Originally posted by bigdanprice
(iii) He is able and willing – whence comes Evil?
Originally posted by bigdanprice
(iv) He is neither able nor willing – then why call Him God?
Originally posted by bigdanprice
Q.E.D.
(After Epicurus 341 B.C. – 271 B.C.)
thanks for reading
Originally posted by bigdanprice
Epicurus was a greek philospher who predated christianity but the points he raised still applied.
' Epicurus is one of the earliest philosophers we know of to have raised the Problem of Evil, arguing against the notion that the world is under the providential care of a loving deity by pointing out the manifold suffering in the world.'
Originally posted by bigdanprice
This is the issue: the world is cruel:
Originally posted by bigdanprice
Where is God?
Originally posted by bigdanprice
to try and say that God has given us free will re iterates his point, see point II in my previous post. The standards are judged the only way then can be buy man's standard as we would judge anyone or anything. it is mans standards that have created and corrupted the Bible. (sliding back on topic)
Originally posted by saint4God
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
saying the bible is the word of god is
the same of saying mein kampf is the word of god
There's no comparison unless one wishes to fabricate parallels between Nazi Germany and Christianity. Creating a colourful analogy means nothing without any support to substantiate the similarites.
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
I was trying to say we found the death sea rolls which contain many of the stories currently in the bible.
and what I used compared was if people found a book from a lost civilisation and don't know of its true purpose or why it was written is it then whise to follow it.
if our civilisaition was lost due to something and people forgot there for who hitler was. and that mein kampf was an propaganda book,
what is it that we aren't making the same fault if people from 2000 years from now seeing mein kampf as the word of god as we do with the bible.
I like to say maybe the bible was written to make propaganda just like mein kampf and we are just walking after the ideas of a death cult leader with bad ideas and the ideas written down were just stories of propaganda just like mein kampf does and leni von reifenstahls , triump des willens. creating a false image of something horrible and people nowadays are following it blindely without question or daring to question it .
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
I like to say maybe the bible was written to make propaganda just like mein kampf and we are just walking after the ideas of a death cult leader with bad ideas and the ideas written down were just stories of propaganda just like mein kampf does and leni von reifenstahls , triump des willens. creating a false image of something horrible and people nowadays are following it blindely without question or daring to question it .
Originally posted by BlackGuardXIII
Originally posted by MarkLuitzen
I like to say maybe the bible was written to make propaganda just like mein kampf and we are just walking after the ideas of a death cult leader with bad ideas and the ideas written down were just stories of propaganda just like mein kampf does and leni von reifenstahls , triump des willens. creating a false image of something horrible and people nowadays are following it blindely without question or daring to question it .
Maybe the Bible was just propaganda, I cannot say that is impossible. Have you looked into the subject at all? You are not the only one to think that. In two books that I have read, the authors present lots of support for that. They propose that Roman writer Josephus was the author, and that the motive for fabricating the NT was to instill animosity towards the Jewish people so that Rome would have more public support for their rule. The descendents of this man rose to prominence in Roman society. But, I am not a subscriber to this theory. People often choose blind acceptance of many things. It is easier than thinking for themselves, and it may result in finding out answers which make one unpopular. What research have you done to better decide what is more likely?