|
reply posted on 19-6-2008 @ 02:13 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
Seems that it is much easier to ridicule this concept than actually produce some evidence that refutes the atmospheric changes taking place on other
planets in the solar system. Plus the people telling about this have some credentials, as none of the detractors seem to have.
Whether this is true or not at least disagree with some form of cogent argument. Instead just a lot of opinions that are based on personal bias.
Too bad, if true this would be an epic chance to actually observe and record the passage of this system. It doesn't say that the earth will be
impacted, just influenced by gravity, and electromagnetic forces.
Does this seem to explain other changes that are observable by geologic evidence. Upheavals, upthrusts, and sedimentary records, what force
moved these rocks and shifted the plates? Seems that more force than normal tectonic drift is at work. Just my opinion and I have only observation
as my input. Actually if Planet X is real, then that explains a lot, plus it would validate many of the unanswered references contained in ancient
texts. So disagree if you wish, but how about taking the time to produce some alternative concepts? Good day!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 04:42 PM by gar_skynet
|
Originally posted by perspicientia
One thing about this so called end of world theory is all those that claim to believe it aint out having unprotected sex and fathering many children
by many different partners , experimenting with mind bending drugs getting pissed 24/7 yet alot tend to turn up here proclaiming it. I know what i
would be doing.
Well said. Who really cares when doomsday comes. Enjoy life as it is. Go out and get laid instead of prophisisng armageddon. Time Wasters. There's
plenty more real things in the world we have to worry about. Try Cyberterrorism. REAL THREAT.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-6-2008 @ 05:18 PM by Incarnated
|
reply to post by ironjello
First off, lets assume "Nibiru" isn't a misunderstanding in translation or mediphyical poetic statements, we'll assume it is real...
Assuming it is real and in an orbit and that it did at one time hit a planet that would become "Earth".
The orbit of that planet was much more out toward space from our sun then the earth is now. The remainder of that assumed planet tumbled into the
orbit that became our earth.
I'll tell you what, you have alot more to worry about come 2012 then Nibiru crashing into earth.
It's more bullslnit.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 25-6-2008 @ 02:04 AM by zorgon
|
reply to post by Anonymous ATS
All well and good... but if it was effecting our planet already... it would be close enough to see... and THAT is the main point here... we cannot see
it ;D
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 9-7-2008 @ 02:20 PM by adkchamp
|
What if Planet x is Jupiter? It's funny how ages ago, the Greeks called their God "Jupiter"...also in a time when the bible was written. What if
its head toward us? If we can see Jupiter as a star at night now, maybe it is?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 10-7-2008 @ 03:30 AM by Mogget
|
Jupiter is in a stable orbit around the Sun. It has always been one of the brightest objects in the night sky, and it has absolutely no chance of
coming anywhere near Earth.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-7-2008 @ 10:31 AM by soup_sandwich
|
ugh this again.
There is no planet X.
www.exitmundi.nl...
However Nemesis thoery is very plausable.
[edit on 29-7-2008 by soup_sandwich]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-7-2008 @ 10:37 AM by soup_sandwich
|
And we know Barnards star is going to pay us a pretty close visit in 15000 years or so.
[edit on 29-7-2008 by soup_sandwich]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-7-2008 @ 12:17 AM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
Seems that it is much easier to ridicule this concept than actually produce some evidence that refutes the atmospheric changes taking place on other
planets in the solar system. Plus the people telling about this have some credentials, as none of the detractors seem to have.
Well Sitchin is the ONLY direct source of Nibiru as a Planet as he started the whole thing...
There are millions of people who believe what Sitchin says.. so
Can anyone tell me exactly what SITCHIN says about when it will get here? Thanks... And when you have done that explain to me why everyone else
isn't listening to him...
To those who are making plans 'in case' Nibiru IS coming let me show you what we are talking about...
SURVIVE THIS
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-8-2008 @ 11:28 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-8-2008 @ 03:59 AM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by Incarnated
First off, lets assume "Nibiru" isn't a misunderstanding in translation or mediphyical poetic statements, we'll assume it is real...
I'll tell you what, you have alot more to worry about come 2012 then Nibiru crashing into earth.
Don't know where everyone is getting this 2012 Niboru thing from...
Nibiru settled into a clockwise orbit (equal to 3,600 orbits of Earth
around the Sun). Nibiru stabilized into a clockwise orbit, equal to
3,600 orbits of Earth around the Sun until 10, 900 B.C.E., when
Nibiru arrived earlier, due to increasing drift from Solaris of
Uranus. Uranus' gravity sped Nibiru's orbit. As a result of this
close encounter between Nibiru and Uranus, one of Nibiru's moons,
Miranda, was captured by and became a moon of Uranus as Nibiru and
Uranus pulled at each other. From 10,000B.C.E. on, Nibiru's
revolution sped to 3.450 Earth years; which makes Nibiru's next
return 2900A.D. rather than 2012 as predicated on the earlier 3600-
year orbit [Sitchin, Z., 2007, The End of Days, pages 315 - 317].
2900 AD not 2012
In Sitchin's own words... that is 892 years away...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 23-8-2008 @ 12:08 PM by Mogget
|
Nibiru settled into a clockwise orbit (equal to 3,600 orbits of Earth
around the Sun). Nibiru stabilized into a clockwise orbit, equal to
3,600 orbits of Earth around the Sun until 10, 900 B.C.E., when
Nibiru arrived earlier, due to increasing drift from Solaris of
Uranus. Uranus' gravity sped Nibiru's orbit. As a result of this
close encounter between Nibiru and Uranus, one of Nibiru's moons,
Miranda, was captured by and became a moon of Uranus as Nibiru and
Uranus pulled at each other.
Utter garbage. There is no chance whatsoever that Uranus could have captured Miranda from the gravitational grasp of another planet in a single pass,
if at all. In addition, why is it that this extremely close approach of a large planet to Uranus did absolutely nothing to the orbits of the other
Uranian moons ?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-8-2008 @ 12:42 PM by zorgon
|
Originally posted by Mogget
Utter garbage.
You missed the point entirely
People are basing 2012 and the return of Nibiru on Sitchin's work, yet he says its 2900 AD long after all of us are gone
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 5-9-2008 @ 12:34 AM by Anonymous ATS
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |