Seems that it is much easier to ridicule this concept than actually produce some evidence that refutes the atmospheric changes taking place on other planets in the solar system. Plus the people telling about this have some credentials, as none of the detractors seem to have.

Whether this is true or not at least disagree with some form of cogent argument. Instead just a lot of opinions that are based on personal bias. Too bad, if true this would be an epic chance to actually observe and record the passage of this system. It doesn't say that the earth will be impacted, just influenced by gravity, and electromagnetic forces.

Does this seem to explain other changes that are observable by geologic evidence. Upheavals, upthrusts, and sedimentary records, what force moved these rocks and shifted the plates? Seems that more force than normal tectonic drift is at work. Just my opinion and I have only observation as my input. Actually if Planet X is real, then that explains a lot, plus it would validate many of the unanswered references contained in ancient texts. So disagree if you wish, but how about taking the time to produce some alternative concepts? Good day!!

Originally posted by perspicientia
One thing about this so called end of world theory is all those that claim to believe it aint out having unprotected sex and fathering many children by many different partners , experimenting with mind bending drugs getting pissed 24/7 yet alot tend to turn up here proclaiming it. I know what i would be doing.

Well said. Who really cares when doomsday comes. Enjoy life as it is. Go out and get laid instead of prophisisng armageddon. Time Wasters. There's plenty more real things in the world we have to worry about. Try Cyberterrorism. REAL THREAT.

What if Planet x is Jupiter? It's funny how ages ago, the Greeks called their God "Jupiter"...also in a time when the bible was written. What if its head toward us? If we can see Jupiter as a star at night now, maybe it is?

Jupiter is in a stable orbit around the Sun. It has always been one of the brightest objects in the night sky, and it has absolutely no chance of coming anywhere near Earth.

Originally posted by Incarnated
First off, lets assume "Nibiru" isn't a misunderstanding in translation or mediphyical poetic statements, we'll assume it is real...

I'll tell you what, you have alot more to worry about come 2012 then Nibiru crashing into earth.

Don't know where everyone is getting this 2012 Niboru thing from...

Nibiru settled into a clockwise orbit (equal to 3,600 orbits of Earth
around the Sun). Nibiru stabilized into a clockwise orbit, equal to
3,600 orbits of Earth around the Sun until 10, 900 B.C.E., when
Nibiru arrived earlier, due to increasing drift from Solaris of
Uranus. Uranus' gravity sped Nibiru's orbit. As a result of this
close encounter between Nibiru and Uranus, one of Nibiru's moons,
Miranda, was captured by and became a moon of Uranus as Nibiru and
Uranus pulled at each other. From 10,000B.C.E. on, Nibiru's
revolution sped to 3.450 Earth years; which makes Nibiru's next
return 2900A.D. rather than 2012 as predicated on the earlier 3600-
year orbit [Sitchin, Z., 2007, The End of Days, pages 315 - 317].

2900 AD not 2012

In Sitchin's own words... that is 892 years away...

Nibiru settled into a clockwise orbit (equal to 3,600 orbits of Earth
around the Sun). Nibiru stabilized into a clockwise orbit, equal to
3,600 orbits of Earth around the Sun until 10, 900 B.C.E., when
Nibiru arrived earlier, due to increasing drift from Solaris of
Uranus. Uranus' gravity sped Nibiru's orbit. As a result of this
close encounter between Nibiru and Uranus, one of Nibiru's moons,
Miranda, was captured by and became a moon of Uranus as Nibiru and
Uranus pulled at each other.

Utter garbage. There is no chance whatsoever that Uranus could have captured Miranda from the gravitational grasp of another planet in a single pass, if at all. In addition, why is it that this extremely close approach of a large planet to Uranus did absolutely nothing to the orbits of the other Uranian moons ?

Originally posted by Mogget
Utter garbage.

You missed the point entirely

People are basing 2012 and the return of Nibiru on Sitchin's work, yet he says its 2900 AD long after all of us are gone