Pentagon Poised To Resume Production Of Antipersonnel Mines, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 11-8-2005 @ 01:53 AM by northwolf
there are several types of mineclearing vehicles in use, some for combat some for after the war/non frontlline use.



These only clear routes for tanktracks




Explosive clearing can be done by using rocket propelled clearing systems
(Python) or simple pipeclearer (bangalore?) the used in Finnish army is 20m long and it blasts 70cm wide pathway to minefield as seen below..



This is better picture of the Raisu (not to be used in intese battles)



It's allso possible to clear minefields by using artillery, mortars or FAEs

And the second most used way of clearing mines



Most common way:



[edit on 11-8-2005 by northwolf]

[edit on 11-8-2005 by northwolf]



reply posted on 30-8-2005 @ 11:56 AM by longbow
I googled for some info on Spider and found this :

The Spider's Munition Control Unit (MCU) is a pedestal fitted with six munitions launchers each covering a sector of 60 degrees, and a communications module which links the Spider with its remote operator.

The MCU communicates with the Remote Control Unit (RCU) by direct wireless link, or via field communications repeaters. On operator command, the Spider autonomously deploys trip wires corresponding to each sector. When a trip wire is activated, a signal is sent from the sensing MCU to the Remote Control Unit (RCU).
Based on that signal, the operator's own observation of the field, and other situational awareness and guidance from the chain of command, the operator can direct the detonation of the grenades associated with the trip wire detection. The operator may delay this action, to allow more intruders to penetrate further into the kill-zone and deploy multiple charges for maximum effect.

Munitions include self-activated grenades, operator activated claymores or various non-lethal munitions. The MCU is powered by a replaceable battery and can sustain continuous operation for 30 days. The system can be recovered and replenished with new grenades after an engagement. The Spider can be deactivated on command, to enable safe recovery or passage of friendly forces. The RCU uses a rugged laptop computer equipped with a touch screen to provide full control of an area up to 1,500 meters deep. Each RCU enables the monitoring and activation of a single or multiple charges.


For me it looks like this is very sophisticated system that cannot work after 30 days (when battery runs out). Also it is not land mine in classic sense (you step on it and it explodes). It looks like it will be very safe to the civilians after the conflict. All the fuss about it is typical example of hystery when some people hear word LANDMINE!!! and start to react without obtaining some info about it.

BTW US was ready to sign antilandmines treaty - just with exception for North Korea border.

www.defense-update.com...

[edit on 30-8-2005 by longbow]


reply posted on 1-9-2005 @ 02:26 PM by Liberal1984
Virtually all casualties of minefields result from poorly mapped mines. Most western countries have long been signatories of the Geneva Convention which demands that minefields be well mapped.

Most minefields that pose a significant risk to human life (i.e. ones in populated areas) were laid by dictatorships or none democratically accountable resistance organisations.

So far many western countries have sighed anti landmine treaties. The joke is that they were never the problem because their forces would tidy the landmines up (excluding Britain in the Falklands in a few uninhabited areas and where compensation for loss of land use has even been paid).
Countries like France and once upon a time Britain were a problem when they exported landmines to almost anybody who would pay for them. This is why so many active African landmine fields are of mines that come from the west.

So the moral of the story is that it’s not the weapons we exported that were morally wrong, rather the irresponsible-ill financed people we sold them to. This is the problem with today’s arms industry not the weapons but the buyers.
Personally I’m against supplying weapons to any non democratic power, and I think we should take charge of the clearance costs caused by our past irresponsibility, just as China must one day for its today.

And yes the spider mine does seem like quite a responsible design. If truly concerned about immoral weapons type "depleted uranium" on Google this is a mildly radioactive metal which is currently being used in Iraq by both Britain and the U.S. Its half life is 4.2 billion years. Because it vaporizes on impact the metal once inside the human body releases radiation at point blank range causing birth defects and other problems.
300 tonnes was used in the first gulf war, at least 1500 in this one.

But in my book landmines used responsibly are just like any other weapon and that’s the sad truth about all weapons. And unlike DU landmines used irresponsibly don't last 4.2 billion years.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



F-22 Pilots Told Not to Talk
  Posted 17 days ago with 23 member flags
Several military convoys traveling through Kittery, Maine
  Posted 19 days ago with 6 member flags
Eglin Air Force Base hangar Foam Party!
  Posted 9 days ago with 4 member flags
Space weapons / Anonymous / Afghan War plan
  Posted 2 days ago with 4 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

RONY 2012
  US Political Madness: 12 hours ago, 71 replies
OMG: 2012 KP24 Incoming! Are we Doomed?
  2012: 12 hours ago, 35 replies