It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tommyc
The IRA have murdered thousands of completely innocent civilians for decades.
The justification being what?
Originally posted by tommyc
Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom and remains so by way of the democratic process. Northern Ireland has been a part of the United Kingdom since 1801.
Unfortunately, the USA public largely contributed towards funding the IRA, which could well be classed as "interfering". The funding wasn't at a US gov't level, it was at the US public level.
It wasn't until 9/11 that the USA public woke up and realised that funding the IRA wasn't such a romantic idea. 9/11 was a wake up call for the US public, whereas us in the UK, we had suffered for years because of US public ignorance.
[edit on 28-7-2005 by tommyc]
The US PUBLIC, Huh???? Prove it!!! Do you mean through tax-dollars? or what? How in the hell did I (I am part of the public) fund the IRA?
denying the IRA did all that stuff you mentioned.....It sucks that they did. But don't blame ME for funding them and don't go off on how the US should have been there.....look at the ones that truly SHOULD have been there...the UK perhaps. Im all about helping others, don't get we wrong.
sporty
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Originally posted by tommyc
The justification being what?
- That the island of Ireland should not have been partitioned in the first place and that the north should not have been allowed to separate and thus provoke decades of mayhem and disaster?
Originally posted by tommyc
Or perhaps none of Ireland should have been given independance?
If you compare with Wales which fully became part of England, Wales does very well out of it and does not want independance from England.
As it is, the people in Northern Ireland didn't want to be part of Ireland, and so only the south was given independance. That's democary at work and the IRA wouldn't except it.
Originally posted by sminkeypinkey
Originally posted by tommyc
Or perhaps none of Ireland should have been given independance?
- Well that's a point of view I suppose, an unsustainable one but nevertheless a viewpoint you are entitled to (and you did say earlier you're Irish!?).
'Home Rule' was the last chance for a close formal relationship with the UK and Ireland and they blew it with partition.
Thankfully with the EU and this Labour gov we are getting the chance to repair the damage and develop new bonds.
(helped massively by the Irish links many 'British/English' families now have - probably more so than such links with N.I. now - due to Irish people living in Britain.)
If you compare with Wales which fully became part of England, Wales does very well out of it and does not want independance from England.
- I wouldn't call Wales an ideal and there are, despite all the efforts over the centuries, plenty of Welsh people itching for greater and greater autonomy.
Whether that eventually leads to a new more independant relationship with England and the rest remains to be seen.
It is, despite appearances, a fluid situation over the long term IMO.
As it is, the people in Northern Ireland didn't want to be part of Ireland, and so only the south was given independance. That's democary at work and the IRA wouldn't except it.
- I wouldn't be so free with the term 'democracy' when describing a gerry-mandered state-let like Northern Ireland and it's formation.
Especially considering the whole thing was so rooted in base and crass sectarianism.
As recent events/decades show we can see only too clearly N.I was not ever viable, particularly when it's functioning depends so heavily on a reluctant British exchequer.
Originally posted by tommyc
The vast majority of Welsh people don't want independence from England.
The majority of the people in Northern Ireland don't want to become part of Ireland.
The majority of Gibraltar does not want to become part of Spain.
The vast majority of the Falkland Islands don't want to become part of Argentina.
It's all part of the same argument. Why should GB hand over these places against the wishes of the majority of people living there?
The difference in Northern Ireland is down to terrorism, with the IRA using terrorism as a way to try take Northern Ireland against the wishes of the majority of people living there. If it wasn't for the IRA then Northern Ireland could have been enjoying peaceful life as they do in Wales etc.
A democratic country such as GB should NEVER give in to terrorism.