Ah yes. In order of appearance:
1. Obtain a copy of the Message From The Pleiades Vo. 1, 2, 3, and/or 4.
Obtain a copy of And Yet They Fly! and a copy of And Still They Fly!
ALL of these books have specific information published within them before the events occurred.
2. Here's another inaccurate statement offered to try to refute accurate ones, i.e "predicting probable events". First, if the events, ALL the
dozens and dozens of events about which you obviously are unaware, were so "probable" why didn't someone like you (let alone a bunch of someones)
predict them? IF the author of the statement troubled himself to research all the available English language material he would see that Meier has a
very large amount of very specific - and not "probable" - propheices and predictions that at least I haven't found anywhere else. And I have at my
disposal something Meier didn't, the internet. That one won't fly so, unless you can prove it, it's your theory that's simply speculation - not
3. A rather funny bit of reasoning here, i.e. it's "immediately suspect" that someone who, for some strange reason, simply wasn't involved in the
original six-year investigation can't get his "hands on" originals. The author should trouble himself to read the photo analysis document on my
site, which is only a small portion of the original investgative report, and he should demonstrate his expertise by informing us of where the
investigators and the experts involved in the analysis went wrong.
He should also note that Wally Gentleman, the special effects expert for Kubrick's "2001" disagreed with him. As did people like Mars Mission's
Michael Malin, JPL's Robert Post, physicist David Froning and, more recently, the Academy Award-winning company that did the special effects for
He should familiarize himslef with the challenge that CFI-West accepted in 2001 to duplicate just ONE of Meier's more than 1,200 photos and ONE of
his 8mm films. It took them four years to come up with six photos - that they then publicly refused to have tested to the same standards that
established the authenticity of Meier's. CFI-West, of course, never came up with their promised film. The author should go ahead and take his photos
(and movie film) with the same known camera, film and conditions as Meier's and then submit them to the same analysis. He should also really educate
himself on an investigation that long, long ago ruled out models, photo montage, special effects, etc., all of which were unavailable to Meier at the
time, as resources or skills, and no colloborators or financial trail has ever been found.
And while Jeff here attempts to dismiss Jim Diletosso and his work, it seemed to be just fine, along with all the other personal and equipment, for
Lt. Col. Wendelle Stevens, USAF (Ret.), who has been studying aerial phenomena since 1947 and is generally recognized as the leading authority in the
field. Read some of Diletosso's comments for yourself:
Further, Jeff can always download the sounds of the UFO for free (as can anyone) and duplicate them as per info to be found in the sound analysis. He
can also attempt to duplicate the stunning video on my DVD where Meier zooms some 300'-400' across an open field in broad daylight to a close up on
a 14' craft hovering in front of a tree. Photo montage? I don't think so.
While Jeff is preparing to do all that, he and everyone else can familiarize themselves with the additional researach done by James Deardorff at:
Last but not least, Jeff can begin to put together a qualified, credentialed new investigative team for the new physical evidence (see link from my
June Newsletter for photographs).
Maybe after all this we will have both less sour grapes and bad "whine".
4. The lack of logic and the imposition of unproven beliefs, the deliberate ignoring of what Meier does have (1,200 photos, eight films, a video,
sound recordings, metal samples, new physical evidence, etc.) makes it unnecessary to further respon to this post.
Again, while people are quick to float their own wild, unproven theories and make completely unsubstantiated claims, let's go back to the facts,
logic and a little thing like the Swiss military's own report of 236 UFO radar sightings right above where Meier has his contacts just to clear our
heads. It would also really behoove the armchair experts to arrange to visit the center in Switzerland and to visit the locations where Meier shot his
pictures and films, as well as to meet many of the witnesses - and OTHER PHOTOGRAPHERS - who are still to be found there.
It would also be interesting if anyone can tell me of another (still ongoing, decades long) UFO contact case and show me the evidence and proof for
it. By the standards set by the Meier case one can hardly say "UFO case" about any other event in the same breath. And, while people often dismiss
it too easily, please remember that we're talking about a man who first shot UFO photos in 1964 in India and then, after he lost his arm, the
quality, quantity and variety of his physical evidence increased exponentially in the following years - a rather unprecedented productivity curve in
light of someone becoming handicapped and considering ALL other factors in the man's life, including the hand typed 25,000 pages of information, most
of which is still in German.