It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
You're not thinking dynamic enough; within visual range is sort of misleading as this envelope can be extend out to 10 nautical miles or more. Don't think of it as strictly physics and or a movie scene, real life is much more complex, unknown and interesting.
+ standard response [trimmed]
Originally posted by WestPoint23
And this is different from any other fighter? The point is how these current and or hypothetical fighters, in terms of capability, match up against the F-22 on paper and then on the battlefield. In any case it's reasonable to say that in the near term there won't be anything which matches or exceeds the Raptors capabilities. And if anyone insists otherwise I'll believe it when I see it and it's (proven) capabilities, until then it's an exercise in pointless speculation. The Raptor is here now and fully operational.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
IRST as a main suite of search and attack is a relatively new concept,
Originally posted by WestPoint23
more limiting than radar,
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The US military and aerospace community does not share the same enthusiasm in terms of IRST capability (and more important reliability) and functionally in an actual conflict.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
One, PAK-FA has yet to even fly, let alone demonstrate and test systems capabilities,
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Furthermore, we also do not yet know the full capabilities of the F-22 in regards to this field.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
All in all, I don't think a Raptor driver is sweating because he might face an IRST capable fighter; ask those OPFOR pilots however how they feel about going up against a Raptor.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
This isn't Hollywood… That's not always the case anymore, when the F-22 is forced by virtue of the parameters to enter into a "dogfight" this happens.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
The IRST field of view while in scan/track is limiting when compared to radar, unless cued to a more specific section with other sensors it is a limited search and track system. That's without even discussing its other many limitations.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Assumptions and more assumption, no mention of specifics and or a likely tactical battlefield scenario/outcome.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
See above, when (if) this PAK-FA flies, demonstrates and tests its capabilities, we'll see.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Also, the F-35 is VLO too, yet will not be as successful as the F-22 in air to air combat.
I have to chuckle when people dismiss the F-35's VLO capabilities and only (incorrectly) assume that's all it offers over existing fighters.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Even claiming current generation fighters are "better" fighters than the F-35 will be
Originally posted by WestPoint23
and that they will even stand a chance against the Raptor.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Yet a new foreign fighter (if it has any form of stealth) will supposedly beat not only the F-35 but the Raptor as well. Ah, logic…
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Again you are not thinking broad enough; this is WWII or even Vietnam for example. Those tactics are archaic when you can
+standard response [clipped]
Originally posted by BlueRaja
The F22 fights a lot differently than conventional aircraft, with regards to tactics. It's quite conceivable that a Raptor pilot would approach supercruising, to get more range for its missiles/element of surprise.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
I doubt seriously that an adversary is gonna get a lock on the Raptor at 20-30km, much less 80km.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
I still think you're very wrong with regards to how effective an IRST would be without any cueing. It simply doesn't have a wide enough view to scan wide sector, without knowing where it's foe is coming from.
The OLS-30M, developed by UOMZ company has a vibration-proof receiver, micro-cryogenic system, improved service life and new software, with respect to the earlier OLS-27. Range is claimed to be 90km in pursuit and 40km head-on.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
The old OLS-27 could scan 120x75 degrees. I don't have figures for the -30M
MiG engineers have defined basic points of the optical locator system development:
- multispectrality. System should work both in visible and IR ranges
- integrity. TV and IR systems, laser ranging system should be united in one solid construction
- system should work on wide angles, up to 360 and identify shapes of aerial and ground targets
Viktor Sumerin, NII PP deputy general designer: “New OLS is much more effective. Two-three times only by range. Old OLS didn’t have TV channel, so it means no picture at all - no TV, no IR. That’s why some of the functions just was impossible to implement.”
MiG-35 OLS may see USAF stealth planes very nicely as well. Today it’s impossible to hide the plane from the complex of powerful optics with IR vision.
Viktor Shargorodsky, NII PP general designer: “Stealth technology today is mostly decreasing it’s visibility in radio bands. But for the optical bands, especially in IR ranges the main parameter is temperature. And you can do nothing about it. Engines have great flow of hot air which can be detected perfectly from the big range if we are behind the plane. If we are going face to face, so first of all we still see some part of this flow and second we can see the front edges of wings which meet air flow and become warm too.”
New OLS is intelligence system of technical vision to work in realtime of fast combat environment. In air combat complex allows:
- detect not-afterburning target on the 45km range and more;
- identify this target on 8-10km range;
- estimate aerial target range up to 15 km.
For the ground targets complex allows:
- tank effective detection range up to 15 km, aircraft carrier - 60-80 km;
- identify the tank type on the 8-10 km, aircraft carrier type - 40-60 km;
- estimate ground target range up to 20 km.
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Originally posted by BlueRaja
The F22 fights a lot differently than conventional aircraft, with regards to tactics. .
Approach WHAT?
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Also, the F-35 is VLO too, yet will not be as successful as the F-22 in air to air combat.
I have to chuckle when people dismiss the F-35's VLO capabilities and only (incorrectly) assume that's all it offers over existing fighters.
What, like alot of the technical partners that are looking at alternatives?
If the F-35 was so hot, why would they be doing this?
Originally posted by BlueRaja
reply to post by kilcoo316
You are comparing a hypothetical aircraft with an operational aircraft, without knowing the true abilities of either aircraft. It has nothing to do with simple patriotic chest beating. My comparisons were against currently fielded/soon to be fielded threat aircraft, which the F-22 will have no problem seeing. You're also comparing aircraft from a country with about 20+ yrs of operational stealth aircraft vs. a country that has yet to field an operational stealth aircraft. What makes you so certain that the latter will leapfrog the technical abilities of the experienced user?
Originally posted by BlueRaja
LW radar may be able to detect an F-22, but like you said, without X band locking up, no firing solutions are available. As for a passive attack using IRST and IR missiles, you're not gonna have a 30-80km range against a Raptor, so unless the missile launch is within the no escape zone, the missile launch warning on the Raptor, combined with supersonic speeds will give the pilot pretty good odds of staying out of the kinematic range of the missile.
Originally posted by emile
Well, why the latercomers cannot surpass the formors?
If I am an American, I will take serious to the potential enemy not present one.
Originally posted by topsecretombomb
Yea in my point of view there is no way the Russians can all of a sudden create a fighter that can take down the raptor much less keep up with it. No matter how much their economy is doing good lol!
Originally posted by Odessit
Pak-fa will be better, do you know why? well because it is common sense that Russians would try to counter F-22 that is why Pak-Fa is made, otherwise , there is not sense in making the plane if it wouldn't be better than F-22, that's the whole idea about it.
[edit on 13-2-2008 by Odessit]