It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bodrul
reply to post by Stealth Spy
the good old saying
there will always be a $1 solution to a Billion dollor problem
the Russians have also been good in the field by producing air craft that are formidable but fraction of their counter parts which is quite cool.
why spend billions on something when you can spend a fraction and get the same job done?
Originally posted by Zaphod58
How do you make a plane better when you have NEVER built a stealth airframe and are 30 years behind, and you don't know the capabilities of the one you're trying to top? You can make it better than you THINK the other aircraft is, but there's no way to say "This airframe is better!" until you put them head to head and prove it.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Sure, and I'm not saying that they CAN'T catch up rapidly on stealth, but in your examples how many failures did they have BEFORE they announced those successes? It also helps that with the A-bomb they where handed everything by former Manhattan Project scientists. So they didn't really have a learning curve to overcome with that, as they had everything they needed.
Can they make something better than the F-22? Sure. Do I think they can do it on their first try? No.
Originally posted by tomcat ha
Mig23 a dissapointment?
It was intended to be a cheap mass produced front line fighter. Imho the mig23 is very underrated.
MiG-23MLD. The MiG-23MLD was the ultimate fighter variant of the MiG-23. The main focus of the upgrade was to improve maneuverability, especially during high angles of attack (AoA). The pitot boom was equipped with vortex generators, and the wing's notched leading edge roots were 'saw-toothed' to act as vortex generators as well. The flight-control system was modified to improve handling and safety in high-AoA maneuvers. Significant improvements were made in avionics and survivability: the Sapfir-23MLA-II featured improved modes for look-down/shoot-down and close-in fighting. A new SPO-15L radar warning receiver was installed, along with chaff/flare dispensers. The new and very effective Vympel R-73 (NATO: AA-11 'Archer') short-range air-to-air missile was added to inventory. No new-build 'MLD' aircraft were delivered to the VVS, as the more advanced MiG-29 was about to enter production. Instead, all Soviet 'MLD's were former 'ML/MLA' aircraft modified to 'MLD' standard. Some 560 aircraft were upgraded between 1982-85. As with earlier MiG-23 versions, two distinct export variants were offered. Unlike Soviet examples, these were new-build aircraft, though they lacked the aerodynamic refinements of Soviet 'MLD's; 16 examples were delivered to Bulgaria, and 50 to Syria. These were the last single-seat MiG-23 fighters made, and the last example rolled off the production line in December 1984.
en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Canada_EH
Umm how about not enjoying dealing with the military industrial complex that is the USA and how they treat their allies efforts. The program is being mismanaged and that is largely why air forces like the RAF, RAAF and CF are being turned off slowly.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
You are comparing a hypothetical aircraft with an operational aircraft, without knowing the true abilities of either aircraft.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
My comparisons were against currently fielded/soon to be fielded threat aircraft, which the F-22 will have no problem seeing.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
You're also comparing aircraft from a country with about 20+ yrs of operational stealth aircraft vs. a country that has yet to field an operational stealth aircraft.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
What makes you so certain that the latter will leapfrog the technical abilities of the experienced user?
Originally posted by BlueRaja
LW radar may be able to detect an F-22, but like you said, without X band locking up, no firing solutions are available.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
As for a passive attack using IRST and IR missiles, you're not gonna have a 30-80km range against a Raptor, so unless the missile launch is within the no escape zone, the missile launch warning on the Raptor combined with supersonic speeds will give the pilot pretty good odds of staying out of the kinematic range of the missile.
Originally posted by waynos
Although the Russians would like Pak Fa to be better than Raptor, it doesn't actually have to be to worry the USAF, only close to it.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Umm… how would anyone get an undetected IR shot against an F-22 without dying 99.9% of the time before their inferior IRST systems maybe works?
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Also, I suggest you look up the AN/ALR-94, the single most complex system on the F-22.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
More effective than an IRST in my oppinion, even if you're still delusional about the APG-77's LPI capability.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
If the foe is flying passive, without any other cueing, then that leaves a big open sky for the F-22 to hide in. It'll be sheer dumb luck if a SU/MIG just happened to be flying at the right place and time, with their IRST oriented in to location the F-22 happens to be flying.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
Additionally you're giving zero credit to the LPI capabilities of the APG77, or that of the ALR94 to detect a wide variety of EM/RF emissions.