It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darkpr0
Me and a few friends talked it over and actually think we figured out a good way of explaining the universe.
We all know bout the big bang and junk. Here's a timeline of events.
-Big Bang: Universe is created.
-Universe expands
-Universe starts contracting
-Universe collapses on itself and consumes itself, leaving nothing but leftover energy.
Since mass=unused energy and atoms=charged particles, energy forms atoms. And since it begins from NOTHING only 1 way the universe can be recreated.
-Universe expands again. EVERYTHING IS RECREATED EXACTLY. Therefore the is reincarnation. And since we always do what we think is best, whether we think about it for long or not, we will do exactly the same things. We are essentially reincarnated.
-Dark matter (clumps of created atoms that haven't dispersed, having huge mass in little volume have so much gravity that the universe collapses again.
And so on and so forth. Therefore, fi this is correct, I have posted this trillions of times, I just don't know it. I have also been completely ignored trillions of times. I know it, but I just don't know to what extent.
The twist?
We figured this out in 47 minutes of art class. CHEW ON THAT ARISTOTLE!
Originally posted by Darkpr0
We figured this out in 47 minutes of art class. CHEW ON THAT ARISTOTLE!
However, recent experimental evidence (namely the observation of distant supernovae as standard candles, and the well-resolved mapping of the cosmic microwave background) have - to most scientists' considerable surprise - shown that the expansion of the universe is not being slowed down by gravity, but instead, accelerating, suggesting that the universe will not end with a "Big Crunch", but will instead expand forever. (The evidence of an accelerating universe is considered conclusive by most cosmologists since 2002.)
Originally posted by andersonr
OK Prove the big bang for starters cos i'm not sure i even buy into that
I.E There is only nothing and mass like a chess board with black and white squares and MASS was like a disease taking over the massless.
Like the black squares on a chess borad turning white with mass.
Once all the squares were white i.e The whole Universe is MASS
Then the process would just reverse and MASSLESS would start to consume MASS but gave up there LOL
Originally posted by Darkpr0
I see all your points, and I know I'm full of crap. I'm not a scientist and I'm not a genius... But lets just play with the thought that I'm right, which we all know I'm not...
Go ahead and deny my theory; that's what theories are for