It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AnjeluvDeath
When did I knock his website? I said it reminded me of someone else's. You also posted a link that does not answer what I asked you?
What I am interested in is the people that continue to claim that zero point energy machines exist and then can never actually prove it. You even say ten years to market? What stage is it at now? I thought your point was that they existed? Why will it take at least ten years to figure out how to sell free energy to people?
Originally posted by theWCH
Originally posted by AnjeluvDeath
When did I knock his website? I said it reminded me of someone else's. You also posted a link that does not answer what I asked you?
We'll chalk the website-thing up to an honest misunderstanding.
You didn't ask me "how that was even possible." That was somebody else. I was providing a link showing that a very credible physicist has showed that in theory energy can be extracted from the vacuum (if I gave the wrong link, let me know, or look through Robert L. Forward's work).
I explained why it would be so long to the market in a previous post, IIRC. The Shoulders/Mesyats work seems to have stability issues. It's fairly easy to demonstrate overunity on a shoestring budget, if you're willing to try, but it's not anywhere near stable.
Originally posted by theWCH
Bearden has a lot of useful information, but you pretty much have to take his jumping off points and go in a completely different direction with your own research, IMO.
He's also done irreparable damage to the public perception of Tesla when he wrongly hypothesized on the working of Tesla's "Death Ray" and further misinterpreted a metaphor as an actual claim in regards to the "Tesla Shield."
Originally posted by AnjeluvDeath
So you are not going to explain where in my post I knocked his web site then? I can earn your scorn but not your appologies. I understand what type of person I am dealing with now.
Right and you answered with some link to something that did not answer what I asked. I do not need links to theorhetical things. I can find those all on my own. I was asking for proof of a [n]REAL thing. Understand the difference?
Originally posted by theWCH
You asked for a link "to something credible that explains just exactly how that is even a little bit possible." Generally, that implies that a person is looking for a link to a theoretical explanation (from somebody credible) of how something is even a little bit possible. If that wasn't what you wanted, then again, I misunderstood you and I apologize.
I'm not going to play these games. You're right about the "type of person" I am.
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by AnjeluvDeath
Clearly, no mere link on the internet can prove "free energy". Why not go check out one of these devices in person?
Or, some ATS folks could just buy Bearden and Bedini's book that has all the schematics, and do a little science project....
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by AnjeluvDeath
Amazing. Declaring a book to be a hoax - without even bothering to read it first!
'Nuff said
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by AnjeluvDeath
Do your own research. Folks like Bedini, Bearden, Tom Valone, Sterling Allan and NEC have put out loads of data on this. There are books, Youtube videos, witness reports, scientific articles, patents, everything.
Why am I getting the overwhelming impression that you didn't come to the thread to learn about free energy, but to just pick a fight with the free energy believers?
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by AnjeluvDeath
Then hop on a plane and go see John Bedini himself. He demonstrates his prototypes to people all the time.
No really - DO IT! No excuses! :p
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by AnjeluvDeath
Well my understanding is that there are independent third-party agencies who peer-review and test and verify these things. I have observed people like Joel Garbon and Steven Greer make reference to them. (Sterling Allan's "New Energy Congress" is likely one of them.)
One thing that I have suggested before is that ATS could form it's own panel of say 3-5 people, people with physics and engineering expertise, and that panel could then analyze things like the Bedini motor, or the Keppe motor, and report back to the ATS community.
It would certainly be interesting, but it would also be reinventing the wheel in a way, because I believe the new energy movement already has those kind of peer-review mechanisms set up.....
Originally posted by beebs
edit: Too bad they charge, but look at the reviews of this documentary:
www.johnsearlstory.com...
Originally posted by beebs
reply to post by AnjeluvDeath
Okay... Not sure what you're getting at. You don't like the charge? Then skip that link. Research the other stuff. I was looking at the features on the DVD, and apparently they have footage of the machines, and of some levitating.