It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FreeMason
Uh they weren't civilians.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were among the last few Cities in Japan that were not struck, even though they were producing weapons and material for the "War effort"...so that the attrocities of their Army could continue.
Chebob, you're no different than any other moron, opinionated, and arrogant, who has no clue what the Japanese were doing through out the war.
If you want to cry for Civilian deaths, go cry about Dresden, the Germans were comparably more civilized than the Japs, and the Nazis were barely more civilized than the Japs.
The only difference between Japs and Nazis, was that the Nazis were only killing Jews and "Undesirables", the Japs just killed everyone that wasn't a Jap.
Originally posted by chebob
Say weapons were being manufactured in Texas during a war.....would that justify Japan nuking Texas? I think not....
Originally posted by FreeMason
After Hiroshima, the Japanese army began to kill Civilians and POWs as fast as they can out of "revenge".
Nagasaki put an end to that.
You Chebob, can now officially shut up.
Originally posted by Valhall
I think you are completely missing a fundamental concept of war:
Do what minimizes casualties on your side in a manner that minimizes civilian casualties on the other side.
Now, I have read this thread and it has been pointed out to you numerous times that the Japanese civilian death count was going up at an astronomical rate without any nukes involved, and they showed no signs of letting up.
You need to go read a real history book so that you understand the U.S. did NOT start the agression, did NOT ask for it, and did NOT warrant it.
Furthermore, the U.S. was NOT the only country being viciously attacked by Japan...without warrant. IF, a single act killing a certain number of people stops a war that if allowed to continue could kill 10 X that number of people, it is warranted...period.
AND, if that single event can be pulled off to the benefit of the side that is doing it...it becomes a no-brainer. You cannot apply morality to military logistics and strategy
...especially against an inhumane opponent.
Originally posted by FreeMason
chebob I only get mad at Idiots...and an Idiot is someone who has an opinion, that is retarded in the eyes of the Truth.
Your opinion is beyond retarded in the eyes of Truth.
Valhall and eye may not get along, but I in no way am "angry" at her nor think her an Idiot
But you, chebob, are probably the least .... guh I don't even need to say it.
Originally posted by FreeMason
After Hiroshima, the Japanese army began to kill Civilians and POWs as fast as they can out of "revenge".
Nagasaki put an end to that.
You Chebob, can now officially shut up.
Originally posted by BOBO
Originally posted by FreeMason
After Hiroshima, the Japanese army began to kill Civilians and POWs as fast as they can out of "revenge".
Nagasaki put an end to that.
You Chebob, can now officially shut up.
You Folks are Way Cool !
Yesterday was the 58th Annniversarry of Hiroshima, Many Japanese Civilians Worshiped that Day and their deceased loved spirits in Harmony with Buddah!
Eat Sh-t And Die, you Mo Fo's that are Proud!
Do you not have Respect?
God Bless You That Lack Privelage To See!
BOBO
THE BASTARD OF WILL YOU LACK!
Originally posted by RogueTrooper
But in retrospect even though the thought of what happened is abhorent to us would the alernatives have been any less horrible?
I would answer "yes", thats my point.
Originally posted by chebob
Ok, I give up. I've already given my opinion plenty of times, no point in repeating myself again. I don't like it, some of you do. I don't think theres any "middle ground" left to argue with. I'll leave tha to someone else
Originally posted by James the Lesser
Ahem, let's see, The Rape of Nanking=500-700k civillians dieing. Why? one main reason the japanese were disgusted because the Chinese surrendered. The Japanese thought that surrendering and not wanting to fight was disgusting and death worthy.
Have you ever seen the videos? You think Hitler was bad, you haven't seen mass murder until you see the japanese at work. The Nazi group killed the enemy, by their thought. The japanese killed anything that wasn't with them. Hell, after awhile they started using their own people(usually prisoners/elderly) for target practice.
Also, in Rape of Nanking video shown in History class, shows the people throwing babies into the air and being shot, like clay pidgeons. Mothers running away with their babies just to be shot down for target practice. Young girls, not even teens yet being raped.
Then in Korea, same thing, just not as many people. Maybe 200-300k in Korea. Then fighting in the Pacific. They wiped out entire villages of people, some who didn't even know a war was going on due to being secluded from the rest of the world.
Anyways, by the way, we killed 200,000 of their soilders in training. They killed over 1 MILLION civillians throught out Asia, at least that many. More could have died without us knowing.