It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Biden--Too Senile to Stand Trial (SC)--But NOT Too Senile to be President?

page: 1
20
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+8 more 
posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:33 PM
link   
So the Special Council is not going to charge Biden with the "serious felony" of "willfully" retaining classified documents...because he is an "elderly man with a poor memory".

Reminder: We are talking about the current POTUS...THE GUY WITH THE NUCLEAR CODES.

FROM THE REPORT:


“We have also considered that, at trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” Hur wrote.




“Based on our direct interactions with and observations of him, he is someone for whom many jurors will want to identify reasonable doubt. It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him — by then a former president well into his eighties — of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.”


...and then there was THIS:



The special counsel at one point in the report wrote that Biden “did not remember when he was vice president,” forgetting when his term ended, and in another instance forgot when his term began. Hur reported Biden did not remember when his son Beau had died, and his memory “appeared hazy” when speaking about a debate over Afghanistan that was critical to his memoirs.

[BOLD mine]
fox59.com...

So...just like Hillary...Joe clearly did all kinds of illegal things ("serious felony")...but we won't charge him because we don't think a jury would convict him.

Because he is mentally unfit to stand trial.

But he's still fit to be POTUS?

Sad.




edit on 8-2-2024 by CarlLaFong because: (no reason given)

edit on 8-2-2024 by CarlLaFong because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:39 PM
link   
a reply to: CarlLaFong

What are the chances, and communities input, that this is planned. That his numbers are so horrible that they dont want him to run but they also don't want a primary. They want to hand pick?


When the 25th amendment really hit steam was in Trumps last few months as POTUS. I think many here were also hearing something abit different. That it wasn't for Trump, but for Biden that they were setting this up.

Feel free to let me know if my tinfoil is too tight.
edit on 8-2-2024 by JinMI because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:42 PM
link   
It's hard to say this.... From a national security standpoint, Kamala Harris would be better than Joe Biden as president.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:42 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

Get ready for President Kamala.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

that would be Obama selling his guy down the river. That is some cold sh!t. Gives me shivers.


edit on 8-2-2024 by network dude because: Beto, what a stupid name



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
a reply to: JinMI

Get ready for President Kamala.


Kamala Heiress?



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:53 PM
link   
a reply to: CarlLaFong

81 million "voted" for him.

We warned them.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: CarlLaFong

81 million "voted" for him.

We warned them.


We did.
Dementiacrats got exactly what they wanted.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:57 PM
link   
Now that it can no longer be denied that Joe is incompetent, who do they have warming up in the bullpin ?

After this, they can't put Joe out front, so they must have someone else.

Harris ?

Newsom ?

Obama ?

Place your bets.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: DAVID64
Now that it can no longer be denied that Joe is incompetent, who do they have warming up in the bullpin ?

After this, they can't put Joe out front, so they must have someone else.

Harris ?

Newsom ?

Obama ?

Place your bets.


Jill may not let Joe step down.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 04:59 PM
link   
So we are just supposed to accept the idea that despite showing exactly why he should be charged, that he shouldn't be charged? His current state proves all the more as to why this should be pursued. State secrets don't mean anything at all?



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: DAVID64
Now that it can no longer be denied that Joe is incompetent, who do they have warming up in the bullpin ?

After this, they can't put Joe out front, so they must have someone else.

Harris ?

Newsom ?

Obama ?

Place your bets.


You actually can do that:
Link



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:02 PM
link   
Question: If Joe is declared mentally incompetent to be POTUS.

What does that say about all his EO's?



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:02 PM
link   
So, is there an upside to this?

Like, equal protection under the law?

Biden is not being charged, drop Trump's trumped up charges?



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:02 PM
link   
"We cannot charge the sitting president because he has dementia".


Well sh!t, welcome to 2024.




posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:02 PM
link   
a reply to: hangedman13

The hell of it is, there will still be die hard Leftists that say he's fine to lead.

"I mean yeah, he can't remember when his own son died, but he's doing a fine job"

Jesus Christ. This is a complete sh**show and the Left is cheering him on.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: theatreboy
So, is there an upside to this?

Like, equal protection under the law?

Biden is not being charged, drop Trump's trumped up charges?


Trump doesn't have dementia.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
Question: If Joe is declared mentally incompetent to be POTUS.

What does that say about all his EO's?


ALL of his actions become suspect.


I too would like to know if there is a precedent for this. I do know we had a president in the past who was indisposed and his wife did lots of things but never researched the aftermath.



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:06 PM
link   
According to the SC investigation...Biden told his ghostwriter that he knew he had this classified information, showed them [the classified documents] to others and said that he knew he wasn't supposed to have it.
edit on 8-2-2024 by CarlLaFong because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 8 2024 @ 05:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: theatreboy
So, is there an upside to this?

Like, equal protection under the law?

Biden is not being charged, drop Trump's trumped up charges?


Trump doesn't have dementia.


Agreed.

I know that will be the talking point....

But can't I dream of true justice just one more time?




top topics



 
20
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join