The REAL Reason They Want to Give Covid Jabs to Kids

I found this report very interesting.

There appear to be so many theories as to WHY "vaccine" manufacturers are so ardently pushing these jabs for children.
Some theories are wild...some make some sense.

THIS appears to make the MOST sense to me.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

--The reason our children are being targeted by COVID mandates is because vaccine makers want to get the shots onto the childhood vaccination schedule

--Once a vaccine is added to the childhood schedule, the vaccine maker is shielded from financial liability for injuries, unless the manufacturer knows about vaccine safety issues and withholds that information

--Products must satisfy four criteria in order to get emergency use authorization:

-There must be an emergency;
-a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective;
-the known and potential benefits of the product must outweigh the known and potential risks of the product;
-and there can be no adequate, approved and available alternative treatments (drugs or vaccines).

Unless all four criteria are met, EUA cannot be granted or maintained

--According to a U.S. federal court decision, the Pfizer shot and BioNTech’s Comirnaty are not interchangeable

--Comirnaty is not fully approved and licensed. It’s only “ready for approval.” Comirnaty is licensed to be manufactured, introduced into state commerce and marketed, but it’s not licensed to be given to anyone, and it’s not yet available in the United States. They’re waiting for it to be added to the childhood vaccination schedule, to get the liability shield

noqreport.com...
(Emphasis mine)

Alix Mayer, board president of Children’s Health Defense (California Chapter) suggests that the REAL reason for the huge push by manufacturers to jab children when they already have a 99.9973% recovery rate...is to evade ALL liability for injuries.

"This is the holy grail if you’re a manufacturer of a COVID vaccine right now. You want it to be fully licensed, but not put on the market until you get it on the children’s schedule." ~ Alix Mayer


It ALWAYS comes down to money...doesn't it?

I find that line of reasoning to be the best yet for explaining the jab craze. It explains the boosters and the denial of alternative treatments as well. S&F.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Sigh, the worry is that children might act as a reservoir for covid and that they might either transmit it to someone who is at a greater risk or that they ight incubate a new more dangerous varient.

The aim simply to stop children from dying it's to remove potential disease vectors form the wider community.

They need to add, "The vaccine must be legitimate. Not some weak-ass sh'it that wears off after 6 months."

a reply to: IAMTAT

It ALWAYS comes down to money...doesn't it?

Didn't you previously say that this was one of America's greatest strengths, and that the potential reward for creating something was what pushed companies to innovate?

Even if it wasn't you personally who said it, I've heard similar things said over and over again on this forum as a reason why socialism was bad. Not having the potential payoff at the end, or having a small state regulated payoff did not sufficiently incentivise companies to innovate in fields like this.

If anything this will encourage other companies to innovate and to refine their shots because they will want a slice of the pie. This will push standards up and prices down.

Or would you prefer to be speaking Russian, and getting your zero choice state mandated shot from the single supplier who didn't have competitors to force them to do things better?

originally posted by: carewemust
They need to add, "The vaccine must be legitimate. Not some weak-ass sh'it that wears off after 6 months."

Your body remembers, so if you are exposed to the virus at a later date your level of protection goes up.

This is normal.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

Diseases don't evolve to become more deadly.

Stop shilling for corrupt giant corporations.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: carewemust
They need to add, "The vaccine must be legitimate. Not some weak-ass sh'it that wears off after 6 months."

Your body remembers, so if you are exposed to the virus at a later date your level of protection goes up.

This is normal.

It must be minimal protection, or they wouldn't suggest a lifetime of booster shots.

The best long-term and safe defense for the kids (and adults) is to catch Covid-19 and recover, according to the CDC statistics.

Here: www.cdc.gov...

a reply to: IAMTAT
isolated from corpse?

The central question raised in this study is the following: is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2  has been isolated  from an unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”?

fda wages war on ivm

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic, but it has shown, in cell cultures in laboratories, the ability to destroy 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19. Further, ivermectin has demonstrated its potential in clinical trials for the treatment of Covid-19 and in large-scale population studies for the prevention of Covid-19.

synthesized immunity

However, our bodies recognize the spike protein nonetheless and begin to create antibodies specifically designed to fight COVID-19, if we ever encounter the real virus.

I'd say you hit the nail on the head with this one.
🙏❤

a reply to: AaarghZombies

(Sigh) Explain to me how this makes sense to you when those who have taken the shot can contract and transmit covid.
PS your phrasing "remove potential disease vectors from the wider community" is highly disturbing. Referring to children as potential disease vectors that need to be removed is beyond awful.

I would have at a guess that the vilest acts ever committed in the history of human kind were committed in the name of money.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT

Sigh, the worry is that children might act as a reservoir for covid and that they might either transmit it to someone who is at a greater risk or that they ight incubate a new more dangerous varient.

The aim simply to stop children from dying it's to remove potential disease vectors form the wider community.

Good god...Does the vaccine stop You from spreading Covid? You know the answer as well as everyone else, so how the hell is it going to "remove potential reservoir for covid"? The fact anyone is still supporting this vaccine crap is mind boggling.

Haven't We had more deaths this year than last? Someone explain how this vaccine has helped anyone other than the ones getting stinking rich.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT

Sigh, the worry is that children might act as a reservoir for covid and that they might either transmit it to someone who is at a greater risk or that they ight incubate a new more dangerous varient.

The aim simply to stop children from dying it's to remove potential disease vectors form the wider community.

The jab is for now, for this planned man made virus, how can a jab for the planned now virus help with a virus that doesn't exist except in your mind, and if you believe in the jab so much then how can children be a danger to people who are jabbed.

Are you ok ?

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT

Sigh, the worry is that children might act as a reservoir for covid and that they might either transmit it to someone who is at a greater risk or that they ight incubate a new more dangerous varient.

The aim simply to stop children from dying it's to remove potential disease vectors form the wider community.

You're vaccine zealotry is not a good look.You have already inflicted it on your children but don't try inflicting your warped views on anyone else.
You are the equivalent of a fire and brimstone preacher.
No ones listening.

a reply to: IAMTAT

-a vaccine must be at least 30% to 50% effective

I don't have much to say about this, but while quickly glancing over it, this↑ kinda jumped out at me....

What's the point of having a range for a minimum?

I mean, "at least 30%" is all that needs to be said.

I guess the extra "to 50%" is just there as a distraction....

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: carewemust
They need to add, "The vaccine must be legitimate. Not some weak-ass sh'it that wears off after 6 months."

Your body remembers, so if you are exposed to the virus at a later date your level of protection goes up.

This is normal.

Remembers what?The insilica spike protein?This is not a virus in case you still haven't gathered that yet and as we can see it doesn't offer much if any protection against covid 19 no matter how much they misuse the statistics.

Sounds reasonable, but I'm kind of leaning towards the mass-depopulation-agenda conspiracy theory.

Yeah, that's pretty far out in left field but, then, so is everything else that's happened in the last two years. At this point, I'd put nothing past them.

Call it Occam's Razor for the New World Order: the most vile theory is probably closest to the truth.

originally posted by: ATruGod

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: IAMTAT

Sigh, the worry is that children might act as a reservoir for covid and that they might either transmit it to someone who is at a greater risk or that they ight incubate a new more dangerous varient.

The aim simply to stop children from dying it's to remove potential disease vectors form the wider community.

Good god...Does the vaccine stop You from spreading Covid?

Good god...Joe Biden says YES it does. Period!

It ALWAYS comes down to money...doesn't it?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Of course .

Children represent a huge share of the market , and they want access to that market .

Play on the fears of the Parents and make billions , Psychopaths are real mate .