Well romantico seems to be under the impresson that Gay Marriages is an "equal rights issue."
Well does it limit the ability of getting a job? No.
Does it limit the ability to worship? No.
Does it limit the ability to get a house? No.
So it's not a rights issue...thus Gay Marriages does not have to exist for any reason.
I for one and most 90% of Nevadans will protect our Right to deny them marriages based on Popular vote, until such time that popular vote should vote
that gays can marry.
If the federal government wishes to impose this law on us, they can try to force it on us with the Military we trained for them. Gotta love OPFOR, we
kick their ass every time.
As for the issue...the definition of Marriage is "Husband and Wife" which means "Man and woman" it will never change because English is a
particular language where the word has a specifc meaning.
Therefore under that reasoning you can't call it "Gay marriage" because it's not between a Husband AND Wife.
Any rebuttles?