It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the materials would trigger protections under subcategory c), the Intelligence Activities of the United States, as well as the Sources and Methods that are being used to gather information in support of the National Security of the United States.
In 2014 a sailor who worked with Patrick Hughes, posted this on Reddit:
“I was aboard the USS Nimitz during the encounter. My job was to strip the black boxes from every plane. The black box tracks all of the flight data which tracks the life limits of aircraft parts. I was in charge of stripping black boxes.
The incident was not cloaked in secrecy. The entire carrier was buzzing with rumors. I was not able to see the COM/NAV actual flight recording, so I was very skeptical.
That night in the berthing I asked a very close friend in intel if he could confirm the legitimacy of the film. Without speaking, he gestured that it was correct. So, my skepticism began to fade and that next day a group of individuals were "cod'ed" onto the carrier and they retrieved all the tapes. I can confirm they cod'ed onto the ship, but the seizure of tapes came from people that work in those shops.
Com/Nav is in charge of the inflight real time footage and they did have the real-time video of the event. The confirmation that I mention I received from my friend, was confirmation that the video exists and that it showed the events as we had been described.
Cod'ed is a term that refers to a small size passenger plane that the military uses to bring personnel on and off of aircraft carriers. The term that is commonly used is ...."People were cod'ed onto the ship today..."
The individuals that took our data were American and not in military uniform. They were also very well dressed. My shop personally had pertinent data that was collected. They did not personally collect it from me, but it was given to my supervisor and after he brought the required data, he was pretty vocal upon his return about how unusual this is/was.
The general consensus aboard the ship is that the individuals were from the government in some capacity and were there to obviously remove any evidence. Imagine if a Pfc. Bradley leaked that video hahaha?” - u/anon402
but IMO these pilots and military personnel witnessed a technology that is far greater than any black op project that currently exists on this planet.
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: shawmanfromny
but IMO these pilots and military personnel witnessed a technology that is far greater than any black op project that currently exists on this planet.
If that's true then why would the full length video only be classified as Secret ?
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
Too many people saw an actual flying Tic Tac looking object with their own eyes for this to be only a radar spoofing tool. There was an actual craft flying through the sky in ways that make man-made objects seem totally out of date.
Anyone who has read the other dozen threads about the Tic Tac incident would already know that.
Ex-Navy admiral says UFO analyses ‘inconclusive’
SARASOTA — America’s former Chief of Naval Operations stated on Thursday that the unidentified flying objects that appeared to have outperformed Navy fighter pilots on videos recorded in 2004 and 2015 remain a mystery. “I’ve seen the videos and, at least in my time, most of the assessments were inconclusive as to what it was,” said retired Admiral Gary Roughead, following a speaking engagement in Sarasota. “But the whole issue of defense against autonomous vehicles is one that the department is taking pretty darned seriously.”
“I remember there was one (UFO), and it may have been after I retired, that seemed to go underwater,” he said. “If in fact it was a real vehicle, how did it launch and recover? Because as you know, it’s not an easy thing to get something that can perform extraordinarily well in the air and dive into the water and become something else. What that phenomenon was, I can’t help you out there.”
“The Department of Defense, specifically the U.S. Navy, has the video. As Navy and my office have stated previously, as the investigation of UAP sightings is ongoing, we will not publicly discuss individual sighting reports/observations,” Susan Gough, a Pentagon spokesperson, told Motherboard. “However, I can tell you that the date of the 2004 USS Nimitz video is Nov. 14, 2004. I can also tell you that the length of the video that’s been circulating since 2007 is the same as the length of the source video. We do not expect to release this video.”
originally posted by: celltypespecific
www.vice.com...[/quote ]
Caught with their pants down, The Pentagon has to lie again. Aww, it had nah thin to do with UFO's, it was just dem darn weather balloons a gain.
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
I assume we have to trust Fravor's word - after all, he is the star and main focus of the entire story.
originally posted by: spiritualarchitect
Too many people saw an actual flying Tic Tac looking object with their own eyes for this to be only a radar spoofing tool. There was an actual craft flying through the sky in ways that make man-made objects seem totally out of date.
Anyone who has read the other dozen threads about the Tic Tac incident would already know that.