It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -Q-

page: 358
142
<< 355  356  357    359  360  361 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 01:29 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

Yes, I was searching around on that term as well.

27974 = zip code in North Carolina.

Argh, I give up.




posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: crankyoldman

He had hat head! He was golfing all day and had been wearing a hat. Thats why his hair looked different yesterday. Personally I think it is an upgrade! He should do his hair like that everyday.


I think he also needs a haircut. But then again so do I.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 01:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: PilSungMtnMan
On a side note, it’s reported that 51 are for impeachment in the House. That’s 23% of where they need to be (218). I think if they don’t have 220+ in the bag, and they take it to a vote, and it fails in the House... that’s actually worse for Dems than;

- getting it thru House and dying in Senate
AND
- not taking to a vote in House at all

I agree. For the Dems, having the impeachment vote fail in the House would be an absolute worst-case-scenario.

Which is why I'm hoping that's what happens.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 01:50 PM
link   
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow


PM for you.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe


PM for you.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT
From REX:

"Well, this IS interesting.

www.politico.com...

If DOJ have dropped that many counts against Assange, including the Vault 7 leak, it suggests Assange may have given DOJ something valuable.

They declined prosecution against Strzok for leaks last week, almost certainly as part of a plea deal.

If true about Assange, I wonder what he gave DOJ ?"

social.quodverum.com...@REX/with_replies



It definitely sounds like the charges were intended to get something from Assange (his deadman file, perhaps?)



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 01:59 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan


Deals are already being made.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 02:37 PM
link   
LOL....maybe JA leaves UK on AF-1 !!
Ok, OK, probably not, but a nice thought.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 02:56 PM
link   
WaPo article on Nader



He helped arrange a meeting in the Seychelles in January 2017 between Erik Prince, a Trump supporter who founded the private security firm Blackwater, and a Russian official close to Russian President Vladi­mir Putin. The purpose of the meeting was of particular interest to Mueller’s investigators, and some questions about it remain unanswered, even after Mueller issued a 448-page report on his findings...

Prince has insisted, both publicly and to Congress, that his meeting in the Seychelles with Kirill Dmitriev, the head of a Russian government-controlled wealth fund, was a chance encounter that occurred because he happened to be meeting with United Arab Emirates officials at a luxury hotel in the Indian Ocean nation.

At the time, Nader had been working for years as an adviser to the UAE. Nader told investigators it was a meeting planned in advance, according to people familiar with the investigation.


Despite the article's attempts to name Trump in every other sentence, I don't see a real connection. Just a connection to Prince, "a Trump supporter".

Anyone want to place a bet that he was leveraged by the Feds to arrange a meeting between Prince and the "Putin associate", Dimitriev? Whether Prince knew ahead of time or not. Guy with a dirty history allowed to walk over 20 years ago and allowed to keep working overseas for foreign governments has to have some puppet strings attached.

This would be just like how they used a foreign asset in Mifsud to set up Papadopoulos to meet with a Russian "niece" of Putin.

And now that the gog is up, he just learned how disposable he is. If he testifies about how he was approached by the intelligence community to set up a meeting now, he is simply a kiddie-porn deviant trying to curry favour with the new investigation.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:02 PM
link   
Wow, Queen just made toast, now POTUS is speaking, WTH are we watching ? Trump reading from a script ? The music, what a weird vibe...IDK...off to my sister's house.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:14 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 




edit on Mon Jun 3 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: these kinds of links belong in RATS



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:25 PM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

Yep....I am assuming this is exactly what happened. We have already learned that they were not above using sources and setting up meetings with the express purpose of entrapping Trump team members. They were not even especially subtle about it either.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:32 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:32 PM
link   
SerialBrain2: Comey’s arrest imminent.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:36 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
SerialBrain2: Comey’s arrest imminent.

I hope I hope I hope. *Crosses fingers*



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:41 PM
link   
a reply to: cherokeetroy

Its interesting how these same people are all passed around through this same group of people for different jobs. Director of this, VP of that, Chief of yadda yadda yadda. Always with Obama, or Clinton et, al. I guess once you have a person vetted and you know they are down with your special kind of evil, it pays to keep them employed and in the fold.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:42 PM
link   
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow

Doubt it.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:51 PM
link   
a reply to: RadioRobert

Same. But, we can hope.



posted on Jun, 3 2019 @ 03:55 PM
link   
a reply to: PokeyJoe

Repeat offender, long history. I'm thinking he must have dirt on bigger fish he's about to get squeezed.

United States v. Nader, 1985

ETA: Nader is one of the 5 major characters in PROOF OF CONSPIRACY

Could get messy.


edit on 3-6-2019 by EndtheMadnessNow because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
142
<< 355  356  357    359  360  361 >>

log in

join