It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: crankyoldman
QueenofSwords territory I know...
187
DJT is protected - well protected (as is his family).
I always keep in the back of my mind what my colleaQue splinter S said "when this is all over white hats will be black, and black white" and we should not get too attached. Something on Comey, I dunno (*post again sir*).
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: IAMTAT
NEWQ
New: Title TBD
3170
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
23 Mar 2019 - 7:43:56 PM
mobile.twitter.com...📁
MAYday
MAYday
MAYday
Democracy matters.
The WILL of the PEOPLE.
UNITED not divided.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
qmap.pub...
Aren't the Anthony Weiner docs being released in May?
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: carewemust
The thing with the yellow vests is, I think, different. They've gotten violent. Q hasn't.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: IAMTAT
NEWQ
New: Title TBD
3170
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
23 Mar 2019 - 7:43:56 PM
mobile.twitter.com...📁
MAYday
MAYday
MAYday
Democracy matters.
The WILL of the PEOPLE.
UNITED not divided.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
qmap.pub...
Aren't the Anthony Weiner docs being released in May?
Q was referring to Theresa May...I don't know about Weiner's docs.
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: IAMTAT
NEWQ
New: Title TBD
3170
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
23 Mar 2019 - 7:43:56 PM
mobile.twitter.com...📁
MAYday
MAYday
MAYday
Democracy matters.
The WILL of the PEOPLE.
UNITED not divided.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q
qmap.pub...
Aren't the Anthony Weiner docs being released in May?
Q was referring to Theresa May...I don't know about Weiner's docs.
Yes, of course. The Brexit vote crisis. Don't know what I was thinking. The crimes of children have been on my mind a lot lately.
originally posted by: YesTodayTomorrow
a reply to: Creep Thumper
The French should have got Le Pen - they didn't have Q.
We have just moved 3500 troops into London - we don't have Q.
UK has no credible opposition at the moment. Brexit is on fire this week.
Tereason in May?
We're all cheering for you guys - start knocking down the house of cards. ooh cliche alert.
YTT
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Just a thought...
Manafort = Ukraine.
John Solomon @jsolomonReports
Did Ukraine try to secretly help Hillary Clinton win the 2016 election? Chief prosecutor says there's a enough evidence to start investigating
Cohen = Lanny Davis
Dmitry Firtash = Lanny Davis
Dmitry Firtash = Semion Mogilevich
Lanny Davis = HRC
I'm seeing a pattern here...
Yes, that’s what I see as off, too.
Especially when you factor in what I added in bold.
I would not say "off" as that was the point. RM said he was NOT investigating DJT. So who or what was he investigating? RM is U1 - bag man+ (Utah investigating U1=HRC/CF/RM). Those cogs were HRC cogs not DJT cogs. It would appear that their real information was NOT related to either their trial or purported reason for questioning is the point. It was HRC/CF++.
The reason I raise it is the HRC information is coming out now - after it is all complete per whatever their doing with them. Along with the rest of the testimonies and now the SC report. With ZERO leaks over two years, they have been able to investigate and tribunal the real targets while folks yelled about the fake targets.
Source: www.newsday.com...
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Saturday that in the name of transparency she would reject any secret briefings of House members about the Mueller report, and that any briefings would not be classified so lawmakers could talk about it publicly.
originally posted by: YesTodayTomorrow
a reply to: Creep Thumper
The French should have got Le Pen - they didn't have Q.
We have just moved 3500 troops into London - we don't have Q.
UK has no credible opposition at the moment. Brexit is on fire this week.
Tereason in May?
We're all cheering for you guys - start knocking down the house of cards. ooh cliche alert.
YTT
So some of the CF stuff we believe is still prosecutable? I mean the activities I’ll call them not within five years are outside of the statute of limitations, right? I was upset thinking that but now I’m unclear. Is any U1 activity still prosecutable even though this was over 5 years ago?
Even where the government has legitimate interests warranting sealing of the indictment, the right of the government to seal an indictment beyond the period established by the statute of limitations is not boundless. "[W]hen a sealed indictment has tolled the statute of limitations, the policy of repose underlying the statute demands that the Government unseal the indictment as soon as its legitimate need for delay has been satisfied."
originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth
originally posted by: crankyoldman
originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth
originally posted by: crankyoldman
Just a thought...
Manafort = Ukraine.
John Solomon @jsolomonReports
Did Ukraine try to secretly help Hillary Clinton win the 2016 election? Chief prosecutor says there's a enough evidence to start investigating
Cohen = Lanny Davis
Dmitry Firtash = Lanny Davis
Dmitry Firtash = Semion Mogilevich
Lanny Davis = HRC
I'm seeing a pattern here...
Yes, that’s what I see as off, too.
Especially when you factor in what I added in bold.
I would not say "off" as that was the point. RM said he was NOT investigating DJT. So who or what was he investigating? RM is U1 - bag man+ (Utah investigating U1=HRC/CF/RM). Those cogs were HRC cogs not DJT cogs. It would appear that their real information was NOT related to either their trial or purported reason for questioning is the point. It was HRC/CF++.
The reason I raise it is the HRC information is coming out now - after it is all complete per whatever their doing with them. Along with the rest of the testimonies and now the SC report. With ZERO leaks over two years, they have been able to investigate and tribunal the real targets while folks yelled about the fake targets.
So some of the CF stuff we believe is still prosecutable? I mean the activities I’ll call them not within five years are outside of the statute of limitations, right? I was upset thinking that but now I’m unclear. Is any U1 activity still prosecutable even though this was over 5 years ago?
originally posted by: carewemust
It doesn't sound like a wise move at all. What's Nancy's motive? Barr isn't going to give classified information to her so she can blast it to the public.
And, for more than a decade, he secretly worked as an informant for the FBI, providing intelligence on al-Qaida, North Korea, New York-based mafiosos and Russian organized crime. ‘I was building Trump Towers by day and hunting bin Laden by night.’
As part of his statement, Cohen said he worked with an individual whom news reports identified as Sater on a Trump-branded Moscow project amid the 2016 presidential campaign; the deal fell apart, though, in early 2016.
Sater’s history with the Trumps and Russia make him part of the probe by special prosecutor Robert Mueller.
According to media reports and interviews Sater has given, he was part of several attempts by Trump to garner business deals in Russia, starting with a 2005 effort to build a “Trump Tower” in Moscow. In 2006, he accompanied Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump around the city to meet with potential business partners.
But later, Bayrock — Sater’s company, which was headquartered in Trump Tower in Manhattan — partnered with the Trump Organization to build properties in New York and Florida, financed with Russian and Kazakhstan money, according to lawsuits alleging embezzlement and fraud involving top Kazakhstan bankers who were investing in Europe and the United States.