It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -sIxteen-

page: 223
133
<< 220  221  222    224  225  226 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: crankyoldman
QueenofSwords territory I know...




187


Maybe they'll take out their own, HRC as a FF.




posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:22 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman


DJT is protected - well protected (as is his family).

I always keep in the back of my mind what my colleaQue splinter S said "when this is all over white hats will be black, and black white" and we should not get too attached. Something on Comey, I dunno (*post again sir*).



C - Yeah that maybe why the 'puppy is gonna be OK...'


edit on Sat Mar 23 2019 by DontTreadOnMe because: QUOTE TAGS ADDED Posting work written by others



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: IAMTAT
NEWQ



New: Title TBD
3170
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
23 Mar 2019 - 7:43:56 PM

mobile.twitter.com...📁
MAYday
MAYday
MAYday
Democracy matters.
The WILL of the PEOPLE.
UNITED not divided.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q


qmap.pub...


Aren't the Anthony Weiner docs being released in May?


Q was referring to Theresa May...I don't know about Weiner's docs.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:23 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The thing with the yellow vests is, I think, different. They've gotten violent. Q hasn't.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Creep Thumper

The French should have got Le Pen - they didn't have Q.

We have just moved 3500 troops into London - we don't have Q.

UK has no credible opposition at the moment. Brexit is on fire this week.

Tereason in May?


We're all cheering for you guys - start knocking down the house of cards. ooh cliche alert.

YTT



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:41 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Hi, c.o.m....I have been out and about today and am catching up. When I first saw that JC tweet today, it seemed soooo depressing. My first thought was 'suicidal', but this is J.C., so, nah!

The 187 reference is disturbing. It seems as if he is telling himself or the receiver of the message that none of this will matter in the grander scheme of time. So, is he resigning himself to accepting POTUS is cleared, or is he issuing the LAST RESORT order?

ETA: Comey was in Cupertino, CA Thurs. and Fri. Wonder if that pic was taken there in the Bay area.


edit on 23-3-2019 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-3-2019 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)

edit on 23-3-2019 by queenofswords because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: carewemust

The thing with the yellow vests is, I think, different. They've gotten violent. Q hasn't.


Yeah...Q followers are keeping our sense of humor.

www.scribd.com...



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: IAMTAT
NEWQ



New: Title TBD
3170
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
23 Mar 2019 - 7:43:56 PM

mobile.twitter.com...📁
MAYday
MAYday
MAYday
Democracy matters.
The WILL of the PEOPLE.
UNITED not divided.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q


qmap.pub...


Aren't the Anthony Weiner docs being released in May?


Q was referring to Theresa May...I don't know about Weiner's docs.


Yes, of course. The Brexit vote crisis. Don't know what I was thinking. The crimes of children have been on my mind a lot lately.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:46 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

I’m putting together a graphic timeline infographic I will try and post in here.

It’s easier, at least I think, when you’re not aligned to a political party, to see things that stand out.

Q is fascinating to me because my mind is one who loves puzzles and this was like handing me the largest puzzle to solve ever.

Felix Sater, Bayrock, and his ties to Russia organized crime along with to Trump and to Semion Mogilevich had me concerned in the early days. I’ll admit I was kinda like WT#?

I was monitoring Q but I was also reading what was being spouted by the left. Trump the mob boss, with ties to the very guy Mueller wanted to take down the entire a$$ end of his career. I thought how weird is that. Is Mueller trying to take out a puppet, and he’s powerless to do anything but investigate and report, and there’s been no leaks? No ones screaming block Trump from all the secrets! At least except those on the deranged left. Strange.

In 1981, that FBI memo reads between the lines like a guy (Trump) saying hey, I’ll build a casino right where organized crime is. How can I help you?” Not long following that in 1985-1987, we have Rudy Guiliani of all people taking down the five families and the mafia “pizza connection” case, also.

I’ll try to get the timeline on here by tomorrow.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: texasgirl

originally posted by: IAMTAT
NEWQ



New: Title TBD
3170
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
23 Mar 2019 - 7:43:56 PM

mobile.twitter.com...📁
MAYday
MAYday
MAYday
Democracy matters.
The WILL of the PEOPLE.
UNITED not divided.
WWG1WGA!!!
Q


qmap.pub...


Aren't the Anthony Weiner docs being released in May?


Q was referring to Theresa May...I don't know about Weiner's docs.


Yes, of course. The Brexit vote crisis. Don't know what I was thinking. The crimes of children have been on my mind a lot lately.


I can't help but think Q is also alluding to J.A.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: YesTodayTomorrow
a reply to: Creep Thumper

The French should have got Le Pen - they didn't have Q.

We have just moved 3500 troops into London - we don't have Q.

UK has no credible opposition at the moment. Brexit is on fire this week.

Tereason in May?


We're all cheering for you guys - start knocking down the house of cards. ooh cliche alert.

YTT


I watched the original with Ian Richardson. It was much better than the US version. You guys always keep it classy and funny as hell.

On topic, we might have fought a war to be rid of George III, but we still have your back.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Just a thought...

Manafort = Ukraine.

John Solomon ‏ @jsolomonReports



Did Ukraine try to secretly help Hillary Clinton win the 2016 election? Chief prosecutor says there's a enough evidence to start investigating


Cohen = Lanny Davis

Dmitry Firtash = Lanny Davis

Dmitry Firtash = Semion Mogilevich

Lanny Davis = HRC



I'm seeing a pattern here...


Yes, that’s what I see as off, too.
Especially when you factor in what I added in bold.


I would not say "off" as that was the point. RM said he was NOT investigating DJT. So who or what was he investigating? RM is U1 - bag man+ (Utah investigating U1=HRC/CF/RM). Those cogs were HRC cogs not DJT cogs. It would appear that their real information was NOT related to either their trial or purported reason for questioning is the point. It was HRC/CF++.

The reason I raise it is the HRC information is coming out now - after it is all complete per whatever their doing with them. Along with the rest of the testimonies and now the SC report. With ZERO leaks over two years, they have been able to investigate and tribunal the real targets while folks yelled about the fake targets.


So some of the CF stuff we believe is still prosecutable? I mean the activities I’ll call them not within five years are outside of the statute of limitations, right? I was upset thinking that but now I’m unclear. Is any U1 activity still prosecutable even though this was over 5 years ago?



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:56 PM
link   
Did Pelosi just (stupidly) limit how much info the House will receive?


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Saturday that in the name of transparency she would reject any secret briefings of House members about the Mueller report, and that any briefings would not be classified so lawmakers could talk about it publicly.
Source: www.newsday.com...

It doesn't sound like a wise move at all. What's Nancy's motive? Barr isn't going to give classified information to her so she can blast it to the public.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: YesTodayTomorrow
a reply to: Creep Thumper

The French should have got Le Pen - they didn't have Q.

We have just moved 3500 troops into London - we don't have Q.

UK has no credible opposition at the moment. Brexit is on fire this week.

Tereason in May?


We're all cheering for you guys - start knocking down the house of cards. ooh cliche alert.

YTT


Le Pen and Le Phone ? 😎



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:59 PM
link   
a reply to: ucanthandlethetruth

If sealed indictments are filed, the statute-of-limitation clock freezes at that point. I remember Adam Schiff in the early days saying that's how they plan to prosecute Trump when he's out of office, even if its after 2 terms.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Re: "FIRE AT WILL, COMMANDER"

Stallions playing Commanders now.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: ucanthandlethetruth




So some of the CF stuff we believe is still prosecutable? I mean the activities I’ll call them not within five years are outside of the statute of limitations, right? I was upset thinking that but now I’m unclear. Is any U1 activity still prosecutable even though this was over 5 years ago?


If there are sealed indictments, I believe they can be charged. But even then, the sealed indictment has to be unsealed in a reasonable amount of time.

United States v. Deglomini, 111 F. Supp. 2d 198 (E.D.N.Y. 2000)


Even where the government has legitimate interests warranting sealing of the indictment, the right of the government to seal an indictment beyond the period established by the statute of limitations is not boundless. "[W]hen a sealed indictment has tolled the statute of limitations, the policy of repose underlying the statute demands that the Government unseal the indictment as soon as its legitimate need for delay has been satisfied."


Not unsealing up to this point because doing so would look like obstruction of justice during the SC investigation is probably reasonable, as may be the limitation in the number of prosecutors available and court vacancies. Still, as stated in the above case, there is a reasonable amount of time between brining the indictment and getting things moving.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 09:12 PM
link   
Its been fun engaging - 2am - zzzzz



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: ucanthandlethetruth

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Just a thought...

Manafort = Ukraine.

John Solomon ‏ @jsolomonReports



Did Ukraine try to secretly help Hillary Clinton win the 2016 election? Chief prosecutor says there's a enough evidence to start investigating


Cohen = Lanny Davis

Dmitry Firtash = Lanny Davis

Dmitry Firtash = Semion Mogilevich

Lanny Davis = HRC



I'm seeing a pattern here...


Yes, that’s what I see as off, too.
Especially when you factor in what I added in bold.


I would not say "off" as that was the point. RM said he was NOT investigating DJT. So who or what was he investigating? RM is U1 - bag man+ (Utah investigating U1=HRC/CF/RM). Those cogs were HRC cogs not DJT cogs. It would appear that their real information was NOT related to either their trial or purported reason for questioning is the point. It was HRC/CF++.

The reason I raise it is the HRC information is coming out now - after it is all complete per whatever their doing with them. Along with the rest of the testimonies and now the SC report. With ZERO leaks over two years, they have been able to investigate and tribunal the real targets while folks yelled about the fake targets.


So some of the CF stuff we believe is still prosecutable? I mean the activities I’ll call them not within five years are outside of the statute of limitations, right? I was upset thinking that but now I’m unclear. Is any U1 activity still prosecutable even though this was over 5 years ago?



Yes it most likely is. They are aiming for Treason and Sedition etc. on all topics which does not end - the lower cogs will get parking violations/IRS if needed. The attempt on DJT early, from my read, put all this under "act of war" so now instead of us being Enemy Combatants (War on Poverty/Drugs) Everyone CF etc. is.

HRC was SOS, which literally meant she could steal kids form Haiti and say it was because Obama ordered her to and she is safe. Her NDA's, Bill's Immunity as Pres, DJT signed contracts at office, and other agreements means she's immune under "not her fault" going back to 92 (Nuremberg is BS). So they have to work around all of that. I wish Q would release those agreements for us to see...

Here is where I see it as crazy. The systems in place were to deal with us and those selected to give the illusion the DOJ is on our side (think oliver north). The controllers have their own system of dealing with each other - think the black eyes here. Those with the back eye mark were hauled in front of a secret Tribunal of sorts. So Tribunal is in their DNA as a thing - not a trial by NY S District court with slaves judging them. See - they cannot be judged by slaves so the systems protect them against this.

So Tribunal is a thing that is supported by their own sense of "justice." Or slave POV is misleading, their overview is not really as it appears either. Q/DJT/More are working around a myriad of our beliefs and their proclivities (and freewill), which makes getting at them bananas from our POV.



posted on Mar, 23 2019 @ 09:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

It doesn't sound like a wise move at all. What's Nancy's motive? Barr isn't going to give classified information to her so she can blast it to the public.


It would be a smart move if they are quickly catching on the Mueller probe isn’t what they thought it was...

sending a message to Barr be careful what you distribute to us? A bluff of sorts?

Even back in 2018 when I found it fascinating Felix Sater came out publicly saying he’s been an intel asset all this time even before 2001, hunting bin Laden even in 1998, it was interesting to me the Newsweek article even then questioned his role in the Mueller investigation.

www.google.com...

And, for more than a decade, he secretly worked as an informant for the FBI, providing intelligence on al-Qaida, North Korea, New York-based mafiosos and Russian organized crime. ‘I was building Trump Towers by day and hunting bin Laden by night.’

As part of his statement, Cohen said he worked with an individual whom news reports identified as Sater on a Trump-branded Moscow project amid the 2016 presidential campaign; the deal fell apart, though, in early 2016.
Sater’s history with the Trumps and Russia make him part of the probe by special prosecutor Robert Mueller.
According to media reports and interviews Sater has given, he was part of several attempts by Trump to garner business deals in Russia, starting with a 2005 effort to build a “Trump Tower” in Moscow. In 2006, he accompanied Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump around the city to meet with potential business partners.
But later, Bayrock — Sater’s company, which was headquartered in Trump Tower in Manhattan — partnered with the Trump Organization to build properties in New York and Florida, financed with Russian and Kazakhstan money, according to lawsuits alleging embezzlement and fraud involving top Kazakhstan bankers who were investing in Europe and the United States.


So Felix Sater was a deep cover all these decades as the articles state many sources confirmed his story to them, working closely with Trump and Russian organized crime is involved, yet no mainstream media journalist is asking the question of if Trump could have been UC all these decades, too?

Consider how his business ties, brand, globe trotting and entertaining mob bosses in casinos and elite at business parties might be an asset to the intel community? Mar-A-Lago, how much intel would it have?

In this book I’m reading by Thomas Paine, who is really Michael Moore, he said one of his jobs was assisting Steve Wynn when he and Trump were battling each other. He said they did a great job for Wynn trying to find dirt on Trump but Trump was always one step ahead of them every time. How does he always do that? Who feeds him intel all these years?







 
133
<< 220  221  222    224  225  226 >>

log in

join