TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -XV-

a reply to: crankyoldman

Did I call it, or did I call it?

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: CanadianMason
considerable force of armed migrants

But how many and what makes them considerable?

That's just it. We don't know.

Some sources claim thousands.

Maybe you're right. Thousands of illegal border crossers, potentially with some of them armed, should just be ignored as inconsequential?

Foolish.

Proper vetting. Legal crossing. All for that.

a reply to: CanadianMason

It is legal to cross the us border and claim asylum. In the past we have put emergency beacons for them on our side to activate and wait for border guards to show up. The push for a continuous wall was purposed as a way to bypass this law we have.

If someone crosses the border and does not report to authorities then they are committing a crime. I feel it is important to keep this in mind when claiming legal crossing is the way to go.

The gps units worked cause we could monitor the border and if someone fails to report then they are likely doing something illegal other than not reporting.

a reply to: daskakik

You can't prove a negative.

Exactly. All the more reason to protect your American border.

...an enemy army is charging the southern border.

Come in legally rather than charge into it, and you will not be considered an "enemy".

It's basic common curteousy. Nobody likes people who cut in front of a lineup at the grocery store, for example. Stand in line and wait your turn!

How much money do illegal border crossers cost American tax payers?

Is it millions, billions?

originally posted by: CanadianMason
Maybe you're right. Thousands of illegal border crossers, potentially with some of them armed, should just be ignored as inconsequential?

Foolish.

Proper vetting. Legal crossing. All for that.

Nobody said they should be ignored. UncleTomahawk said BP and National Guard can handle it. The military is just for show or (tin foil hat edition) maybe to get the people used to seeing them used against them.

I don't know why members of a CT site can't grasp that part of what UncleTomahawk is saying.

originally posted by: UncleTomahawk
a reply to: CanadianMason

It is legal to cross the us border and claim asylum. In the past we have put emergency beacons for them on our side to activate and wait for border guards to show up. The push for a continuous wall was purposed as a way to bypass this law we have.

If someone crosses the border and does not report to authorities then they are committing a crime. I feel it is important to keep this in mind when claiming legal crossing is the way to go.

The gps units worked cause we could monitor the border and if someone fails to report then they are likely doing something illegal other than not reporting.

Let's see you put an "emergency beacon" on the roof of your home, lol!!! Eventually, I think you'd take it down and erect a wall - or fortify it with buses.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
Exactly. All the more reason to protect your American border.

Nobody said otherwise.

Come in legally rather than charge into it, and you will not be considered an "enemy".

It's basic common curteousy. Nobody likes people who cut in front of a lineup at the grocery store, for example. Stand in line and wait your turn!

Has nothing to do with the claim that they are an armed force.

How much money do illegal border crossers cost American tax payers?

Is it millions, billions?

From numbers I have seen they contribute more to the GDP than what they cost. People are always asking why? Follow the money.

a reply to: daskakik

Let's be clear. I'm open to providing assistance to someone who needs it; not to someone who demands it and feels entitled to it. I've opened my home to a few couch surfers over the years; and I've kicked a few out after it became apparent that they were just taking advantage.

My home does not have an open boder policy; but, someone who is in need who asks me to stay here for a while until they get on their feet? I'm not opposed to that if I feel my family will be safe and if I can afford to support them in the interim.

I don't know. It's not rocket science.

a reply to: daskakik

UncleTomahawk said BP and National Guard can handle it.

How the hell does UT know that? Does UT know better? So we should just accept UT's statement?

Ridiculous!

I fully grasp what UT is saying and I fully disagree.

Keep it up, sharpie!

We have a saying here in Canada: We're all friends until the puck drops.

Here's 17 ways you can win a Face Off:

I was revisiting Q Posts around the 2018 SOTU and may have found something in #643:

Q !UW.yye1fxo No.78
Jan 29 2018 23:36:24 (EST)
Narrative shift.
———————————
Nation on alert.
Firing RR = block Mueller.
Firing RR = set up to firing Mueller.
Firing RR = Red line.
———————————-
What was the Senate conf vote re: RR?
Why did RR [BEG] Ryan to block the FISA MEMO from Congressional review/further advancement?
REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators + [2] former O-senior officials + [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].
TOP SEC CLEARANCE IS MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION - HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?
WE SEE YOU.
Q

(bolding mine)

1) [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP]... HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?
What if these were 4 representatives from the other 4 FVEY countries?
Would RR beg Ryan to block FISA because revelation that all other FVEY countries were undermining US elections and New POTUS would cause a global war with the british "empire"?
HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE? US Dept of State Foreign Affairs Manual: 12 FAM 717.2-3 Visitors explains:

(CT

S-258; 06-13-2016)

a. A visitor is any individual, indoctrinated into SCI or not, who is not employed by or detailed to the bureau or post and/or who is not listed on the SCIF access roster. Conduct access by foreign national employees to post SCIFs in compliance with 12 FAH-6 H-500 OSPB standards. Enter all visitors into the visitor log (see 12 FAM 717.2-4, below).

b. Department employees, contractors, and other authorized personnel with a ‘five’ on their domestically issued Department badge have SCI (SI/TK/G/HCS) access. The five is preceded by an S (for Department employee), N (for contractor), and O (for other Government organizations). Do not assume a visitor has SCI access. Verify SCI access using the RSO Security Management Console, or through the DS/IS/SSO Access Control Team. The Access Control Team can also be reached via email at “DS_SSO” on either CLASSNET or OPENNET.

c. In some cases, Five Eyes (FVEY) visitors may have reciprocal SCI access; however these visitors will not be approved for access to all compartments. The office sponsoring the visitor should contact DS/IS/SSO as soon as they are made aware of the visitor's access requirements, as guidance will be provided on a case-by-case basis.

d. Non-SCI indoctrinated personnel (including all maintenance and cleaning crews) may enter the SCIF only when SCI material is not present, or the SCIF is sanitized (i.e., SCI discussions, handling, and electronic processing cease, and all SCI documents are covered or stored).

e. Prior to granting access to non-SCI indoctrinated personnel, there should be an announcement or notification to all SCIF occupants that there will be non-SCI indoctrinated personnel entering the facility. All TS/SCI material, operations and discussions must cease until the uncleared personnel have departed. This includes covering or securing all TS/SCI material, turning off all TS/SCI systems, and ceasing all SCI conversations. Non-SCI indoctrinated personnel entering the SCIF must be continuously escorted (close proximity, never left unattended in the facility). An SCI indoctrinated person from the bureau or post familiar with the security procedures of that SCIF must escort the non-SCI indoctrinated person at all times to prevent a compromise. All visitors must be under the continuous escort ratio of one appropriately TS/SCI personnel to two escorted persons.

f. Before entering the SCIF, visitors must be asked by the person granting access if they have Portable Electronic Devices (PEDs) (see 12 FAM 718) in their possession. If so, they cannot enter until the device has been secured outside/away from the facility and preferably turned off. Many facilities provide boxes for this purpose.

g. Emergency personnel and equipment will be allowed access to SCIFs escorted to the degree practical consistent with safety considerations as determined by the senior emergency responder on site. Emergency personnel will be asked to sign an inadvertent nondisclosure agreement when feasible (see 12 FAM 715.6 paragraph b) if exposed to classified information.

(Note the date of these sections = June 13th 2016)

Remainder of this post is spitballing speculation:

2) What if Red line = China?
a) We hear that a Chinese invasion MAY be being prepared from Mexico,
b) What if China, deep state and the other 4 countries in FVEY formed an axis?
c) China from south... Canada from north?
d) China/AUS/NZ could be a strong team to expand across Asia?
e) Why does FISA bring down the House? Is the house more China controlled than Russia or deep state?

ETA Former PM David Cameron is to take a leadership role in a $1bn investment fund set up to back China’s Belt and Road infrastructure initiative.

There are around 350,000 army national guard troops. They are trained at the same bases active military is trained. They can handle the task easily.

The guy waits 5 years before reporting this?

www.washingtonexamine... r.com/news/florida-politician-with-alleged-habit-of-licking-men-and-groping-them-quits

Comedic relief.

originally posted by: CanadianMason
How the hell does UT know that? Does UT know better? So we should just accept UT's statement?

What difference does it make what "you" accept?

BP and NG are armed and they could deal with a group of men with light weapons. Unless anyone has seen any armored vehicles and heavy artillery rolling with the caravan, they are enough.

PP Pays $6.5 Million for a Seat at the SOTU?

Your hard-earned tax dollars at work.

Q2674

a reply to: daskakik

www.ice.gov... -child-sex-offender-charged-houston-illegally-re-entering-us

Fine, just let all the illegal border crossers in then. Give them cash, education, jobs, housing, health care, whatever they want.

Heck, why don't we all just go socialist right now?

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: daskakik

Fine, just let all the illegal border crossers in then. Give them cash, education, jobs, housing, health care, whatever they want.

Heck, why don't we all just go socialist right now?

Or we could just put the national guard down there in appropriate numbers to deal with them while we get the kinks out of the system being used at the port of entry. We do not have enough judges and only accept a limited number of people and very often the ports are just closed.

It is my belief that if we actually dealt with them at the ports then they would use them and allow us to focus on the actual criminal entries of people who are trying to evade the border patrol.

I am all for stronger naturalization process work visa's and removing the bad hombres.

a reply to: CanadianMason

You need to stop with the strawman arguments.

Have you forgotten that the topic being discussed is "the military needs to be at the border because there is an armed enemy force setting up to invade"?

originally posted by: CanadianMason
a reply to: daskakik

Fine, just let all the illegal border crossers in then. Give them cash, education, jobs, housing, health care, whatever they want.

Heck, why don't we all just go socialist right now?

This investigation is being conducted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Enforcement Removal Operations (ERO) Violent Criminal Alien Section (VCAS) in Houston, Texas. ERO Houston VCAS works with federal prosecutors to pursue criminal convictions and subsequent removal orders for violent criminal aliens.

This completely highlights the current problem. 5 different gov. agencies to deal with one person who should not be here. The county should have arrested him should have been allowed to put him on a plane back home or sentence him.

a reply to: daskakik

Does he appear to be made of straw to you?