What to expect if the 9/11 truth bomb does drop

originally posted by: username74
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

Again, it is on topic. Nukes and missiles used on 9/11 are fantasies. I don’t know what to tell you.

While the real and serious questions are,
What ties did the terrorists have.
Who helped them financially, get in the country, and help them stay in the country.
Why was the gross negligence of protecting this country whitewashed with little consequence for those in charge.
Why were the towers built to minimize cost by minimizing concrete usage.
Why did the WTC have deficient fire insulation.

a reply to: neutronflux


Simple answer to all of those questions; the NWO globalist agenda required them to occur so we could prepare the world for turning the population into sandwiches for the end times.

a reply to: neutronflux

save your spiel for those who are daft enough to swallow it.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

if there were any simple answers this thread would be a less disturbed place

a reply to: username74


There are plenty of simple answers including the fact that the site you linked is run by a moron, most likely a low grade one, whose parents are siblings.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: username74


There are plenty of simple answers including the fact that the site you linked is run by a moron, most likely a low grade one, whose parents are siblings.

So you're saying we didn't get nuked by soviet era bombs that magically got retrofitted to create a blast without fallout?

a reply to: CriticalStinker

you dont remember the 'ice age rock' under the wtc
www.sott.net...


"Such an explosion will cause neither any air-blast wave, nor any thermal radiation. Its ionizing radiation will be stopped by surrounding materials and thus it cannot travel up to the earth’s surface. The same thing will happen with the free electrons – all of them will be stopped by surrounding rock; thus no noticeable EMP could be created as well. However, such an underground explosion will still release great amounts of highly poisonous radio-nuclides resulting from chain reaction into the surrounding melted and vaporized rocks.

Secondly, even though it won’t cause any air-blast wave, it would cause some noticeable shock to the Earth akin to an earthquake that will travel to great distances across the Earth in the form of seismic waves. These will be definitely detected by various seismic control services in the same manner they usually detect natural earthquakes.

The resulting picture after such a deep underground nuclear explosion will look like this: there will be a cavity under the earth’s surface that results from the disappearance of the vaporized rock. The size of this cavity directly depends on the explosive yield and on the hardness of surrounding soil and could be easily calculated.

Just for example – a 150 kiloton yield deep underground nuclear explosion could vaporize enough rock to create a cavity of up to 100 meters in diameter (50 meters in radius). Though, this cavity will be created not only by the actual disappearance of the rock, but also as a result of an additional expansion of the cavity by the high pressure of the vaporized rock in gaseous form inside the cavity seeking to expand the cavity to every direction."

a reply to: CriticalStinker

lol
it was a passing comment on the scale of ideas.
when you go fishing for ideas you dont want some behemoth you cannot get in the boat but neither do you want a tiddler of an observation like your nostril and finger matching size.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
So you're saying we didn't get nuked by soviet era bombs that magically got retrofitted to create a blast without fallout?

Yes, it was the same micro-nukes that took down the Twin Towers.

originally posted by: username74
research that, didya?

Yeah, I did, 'armored nuclear cruise missile' that hasn't even been deployed yet.

I reiterate, they're morons. This is why no one takes '9/11 truth' seriously.

a reply to: kwakakev

so there you have it OP
your answer
if the truth came out it would be the same #fight it is now.
people believe what people believe.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Dont you just love new technology lol?

a reply to: CriticalStinker

You made me laugh.

a reply to: username74

There was a subway under the WTC... Several lines met there. Two from New Jersey.

a reply to: username74

The first common sense questions, supposedly three buildings at the WTC were brought down by CD. All three buildings fell at different times. The recorded seismic activity started outnsmall, grew, spiked, and then trailed off for WTC 1 and 2. What times were the supposed nuclear detonations that supposedly brought down each building in relation to each collapse time? And why didn’t the seismic readings instantly spike, then trail off?

originally posted by: username74
a reply to: kwakakev

so there you have it OP
your answer
if the truth came out it would be the same #fight it is now.
people believe what people believe.

Coming from a conspiracists who replied to the reality a jet hit the pentagon?

originally posted by: username74
a reply to: neutronflux

muh reality!!!