It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hackers stole 18,000 documents related to 9/11; are releasing them as their ransoms aren't met

page: 21
140
<< 18  19  20    22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 13 2019 @ 01:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Mover3

So, now it’s down to time travel?



posted on Jan, 15 2019 @ 01:17 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

There comes a point when you must realise people are taking the piss out of you? You've come to a site like this trying to label "conspiracists". You don't think 9/11 was a conspiracy? Good on you, it was Iraq and Bin Laden who orchestrated 9/11 because they thought Bush's dad would be in the WTC.



posted on Jan, 15 2019 @ 08:42 AM
link   
Welp, this turned out to be a predictable nothing burger.



posted on Jan, 15 2019 @ 08:42 AM
link   
...
edit on 15-1-2019 by MrSporkster because: double post...



posted on Jan, 17 2019 @ 05:52 AM
link   
Is that it?
No more dumps?
I’m getting so sick of the letdowns inr this twisted world.



posted on Jan, 17 2019 @ 06:22 PM
link   
So... Is that it?

Predictable



posted on Jan, 17 2019 @ 06:48 PM
link   
I wonder when 9/11 truthers will realize how full of it this whole conspiracy theory (in reality multiple competing conspiracy theories) has been.

A lot of money selling books, speaking tours, and ad space on various websites.

All we have to show for it is NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE.



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 09:28 AM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn


Yes, multiple competing conspiracy theories. Very well put, and very true.

On the one hand we have the official conspiracy theory offered up by the 911 Commission whose chairs noted they were set up to fail, and on the other hand a variety of other theories contradicting the official theory.

I learned long ago that it is foolish, even irrational, to believe the statements of known and professional liars in government.

Which group do you fall into?



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 01:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: projectvxn


Yes, multiple competing conspiracy theories. Very well put, and very true.

On the one hand we have the official conspiracy theory offered up by the 911 Commission whose chairs noted they were set up to fail, and on the other hand a variety of other theories contradicting the official theory.

I learned long ago that it is foolish, even irrational, to believe the statements of known and professional liars in government.

Which group do you fall into?



Not the charlatans of the truth movement. Not for Nukes, holograms, energy weapons, dancing Jews, lasers, stolen Russian missiles, basement bombs with no visible shockwave causing buckling 80 floors above ground.

Not for truth groups panhandling for donations for studies and models they never complete.


B



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 03:29 PM
link   
Latest release was not really what we expected and made 'TDO' lose a lot of credit, at least for now..
edit on 18-1-2019 by Drazzl because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 18 2019 @ 04:27 PM
link   
I would have been shocked if something came of this, nothing ever happens good.



posted on Jan, 20 2019 @ 07:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: EnigmaChaser
I’m starting to believe this is a nothing burger - although I wish it wasn’t!

If they asked for my advice - which they didn’t - I’d tell them that they have done it wrong.

If someone’s got 2mm to drop in this they probably aren’t dumb. So, they won’t take it faith.

They need to drop a juicy piece that calls out the UFO phenomenon or implicates some real powerful people tied to 9/11 but, the piece on its own without supporting evidence would be exciting but somewhat fanciful without corroborating evidence.

More of a “here’s some stuff you will want to be able to confirm. Pay the money and you’ll get your confirmation.”

Since I don’t have $2mm to drop on this I won’t be the one to figure this out!



That is the problem with something being true.

It might not have anything like that in it. Not that we'll ever see it anyway. The companies the data got stolen from can legally suppress it, just like they could if it were copyrighted material. (Perhaps the laws are even stronger for them.)

So any website that posts it is basically getting shut down.


If we really want the documents to get out, someone needs to print everything on paper. Distribute physical copies that can't be tracked by the NSA.

Or maybe better yet: burn it to disc. Cheap dvd rom discs. Then the people who receive them can make copies, who can then make copies........... etc....



posted on Jan, 20 2019 @ 07:11 PM
link   
This is what modern day book burning looks like.



posted on Jan, 21 2019 @ 04:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: projectvxn


a variety of other theories contradicting the official theory.



And each other, even after all these years. Odd that



posted on Jan, 21 2019 @ 04:24 AM
link   
I have a feeling that this will just make the goverments come down hard on regulating the internet. Problem reaction solution scenario.

Even though I hope it's all real. I wouldn't be too shocked if a China style internet will be enforced if this spirals out of control


(post by Saibotkram1988 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Jan, 21 2019 @ 05:01 AM
link   
a reply to: lightedhype

All the links are broken their Twitter has been banned. Only reddit link works



posted on Jan, 21 2019 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Saibotkram1988

Ok. Thanks for the cogent argument for why you keep going for a ride.

Enjoy.
edit on 21 1 19 by projectvxn because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2019 @ 02:58 PM
link   
a reply to: saltlick






posted on Jan, 21 2019 @ 07:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: mrthumpy

originally posted by: Salander
a reply to: projectvxn


a variety of other theories contradicting the official theory.



And each other, even after all these years. Odd that



I'm sure a lot of them were made up and put online by the people who did it.

Like the Pentagon footage of a missile hitting the Pentagon theory. Clearly the Pentagon was hit by a plane, but releasing the footage divided the truthers and weakened their argument.

So why release this kind of stuff?

www.youtube.com...

Just to confuse. That's political strategy 101.




top topics



 
140
<< 18  19  20    22 >>

log in

join