It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Simon_Boudreaux
ORRRRRRR they are really desperate to get Trump to act appropriately and trying more extreme measures to accomplish this.
But yeah, OBVIOUSLY it makes more sense for it to be a plant and not an act of desperation after months of failing to get Trump to act Presidential.
originally posted by: Simon_Boudreaux
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Simon_Boudreaux
ORRRRRRR they are really desperate to get Trump to act appropriately and trying more extreme measures to accomplish this.
But yeah, OBVIOUSLY it makes more sense for it to be a plant and not an act of desperation after months of failing to get Trump to act Presidential.
I don't recall saying it was a plant and the op-ed reeks of desperation. Someone of noble intent for this nation isn't going to put an opinion piece in the NYT of all places. They would have talked to every MSM outlet.
Only a complete moron would place themselves in such a position as whoever wrote this piece, Orrrrrr believe it's automatically true because it goes against Trump.
When the NYT, or the source, can come forward with some actual proof I can't take the op-ed seriously.
originally posted by: vinifalou
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I'm not surprised you didn't clicked on the link to see the evidences.
You just reached Silly's level.
Put your fingers on your ears and scream LALALALALA now.
I don't even know what this means. What campaign are you talking about? What is this about 'spying".
This doesn't make sense to me.
originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I don't think it's unreasonable to believe that an anonymous source, writing in a newspaper dedicated to removing Trump from office, is actually fake. I think that is the reasonable position to take, in fact. It could be a real person, but they need to come forward.
Please don't go on about every anonymous source, like deepthroat, that has turned out to be real. Anyone could say the same about Q.. Oh, it's real because deepthroat was real! Nonsense.
This feels to me like a tactic - a new approach of 'giving an official voice' to the crazy rhetoric that has been coming form the main stream media - designed to throw the President off balance as he wonders who it is.
Anyone assuming it's all real and the NYT is playing with a straight bat on this really is a moron.
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: Simon_Boudreaux
do you think all that regarding Q as well.
originally posted by: Simon_Boudreaux
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I based it off my opinion as it's what I would do.
You know, an opinion, the same as the person who wrote the op-ed. The op-ed you're automatically taking as fact. What logic are you using to conclude this op-ed is something more than opinion?
I'm not making up anything so I don't have to believe it isn't true. I didn't vote for Trump, nor do I care about him anymore than any other person that's held office. I just don't take opinion as fact without something provable to back it up.
As far as not wanting to see things...You're hatred for Trump is refusing to let you see that this whole piece could be nothing more than political bs. It goes against Trump so it must be true in your eyes.
You're betting on Pence? Respect your opinion and look forward to more evidences to support the theory.
But my money goes to Trump trolling the NYT and the left. He's pretty good at it.