It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -e11even-

page: 202
131
<< 199  200  201    203  204  205 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 09:53 PM
link   
Note that Q Post #2117 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub is a 10 minute MARKER, meaning Important in relation to the Medium past.


If [RR] is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
if Mueller is dirty, [RR] must also be dirty.
Q




posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 09:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

Could 306 from the 306223 be 30th June (European date format). Anything special happen on Jun 30th?



Nothing comes to mind except that it's the exact midpoint of the year ( on leap years ). On non-leap years it would be the last day of the first half of the year.



posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 10:29 PM
link   
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Re Q post #2117 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub:

If [RR] is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
if Mueller is dirty, [RR] must also be dirty.
Q


I'm wondering if there is a double entendre within this.

What if [RR] could be read as Ronald Reagan as well as Rod Rosenstein?

According to a Washington post article:

I don't worry about Robert Mueller. He is a lifelong Republican with a career of distinguished service running the Criminal Division of the Justice Department for President Ronald Reagan...


If we use Ronald Reagan as the 2nd [RR] then I think the post MAY be telling us that neither Mueller or Rosenstein are dirty just as Ronald Reagan wasn't dirty?



posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 10:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

Could 306 from the 306223 be 30th June (European date format). Anything special happen on Jun 30th?



For some reason I just saw "playbook-call" as a marker of some sort. Then we see 306-223.

The electoral was 304-227.

Playbook-call is of course a football reference.



posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Re Q post #2117 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub:

If [RR] is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
if Mueller is dirty, [RR] must also be dirty.
Q


I'm wondering if there is a double entendre within this.

What if [RR] could be read as Ronald Reagan as well as Rod Rosenstein?

According to a Washington post article:

I don't worry about Robert Mueller. He is a lifelong Republican with a career of distinguished service running the Criminal Division of the Justice Department for President Ronald Reagan...


If we use Ronald Reagan as the 2nd [RR] then I think the post MAY be telling us that neither Mueller or Rosenstein are dirty just as Ronald Reagan wasn't dirty?


Rel, I'm still wondering the RR vs Rosenstein thing. Rosenstein not by name but RR, until yesterday and it is highlighted a sole post. My thought was the Black Hats had no real way of knowing which side RR was on, now it is set? RR=playing both sides, or neither side, or unclear which side? Key is in RR vs. Rosenstein me thinks...



posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 11:14 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Cranky, I have a slightly different view.

The name Rosenstein has been used in posts before (#2106, #2069, #1316, #780).

However #2117 is the first time Q calls him Mr. Rosenstein.

Some might argue that Mister is a term of respect?


edit on 8-9-2018 by RelSciHistItSufi because: (no reason given)


(post by crankyoldman removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 11:29 PM
link   
Updated spreadsheets:

Unanswered Q V9.4 20180908 to 2119 incl. DECODE tools
QPosts Pictures v9.4 20180909 from QPost 1201 to 2119

Notes
1) POTUS tweets up to Sep 08 2018 20:54:14 from @realdonaldtrump at twiiter.com
2) Q Posts up to #2119 from qntmpkts.keybase.pub
3) POTUS tweeted a 1 minute MARKER after Q Post #2092 (important: Imminent action):

"Join me tomorrow night at 7:00pm MDT in Billings, Montana for a MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN RALLY! Get your tickets here: t.co..."

4) Q post #2102 was a 10 minute MARKER after this POTUS tweet:

"Landing in Montana now to support Matt Rosendale for U.S. Senate! #MAGA t.co..."

5) POTUS tweeted this 5 minute MARKER (Important in relation to recent past), after #2111

"14 days for $28 MILLION - $2 MILLION a day, No Collusion. A great day for America!"



posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 11:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: crankyoldman

Cranky, I have a slightly different view.

The name Rosenstein has been used in posts before (#2106, #2069, #1316, #780).

However #2117 is the first time Q calls him Mr. Rosenstein.

Some might argue that Mister is a term of respect?



Over in the colonies saying "mister" is often condescending.


#2106 = sig list.
#2069 = as chain of command, like on the office wall.
#1316 = repeat of chain...
#780 = Quote from another.

For me in each case we see his proper name, it can be attributed to a non-Q related point. Where as RR's show up in various forms including different kill boxes.

Q didn't say "good bye RR" which would be consistent. Mabye RR was in fact the double agent or "turned" agent. Rosenstein was the black hat. When saying "good by Mr. Rosenstein" he sorta means "hello RR" or, "good bye black hat, hello white hat and you black hats are fools."

Then we go back to RR/Mueller Dirty, could indicate either they both play ball, or neither plays ball because they hinge on each other?



posted on Sep, 8 2018 @ 11:40 PM
link   
a reply to: crankyoldman

Makes sense Cranky, especially with colonies slant to Mister.



Time for some zeds



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 12:55 AM
link   
Donald, take a break from Tweeting for a moment and...

Build the Wall

Lock Her Up

Declassify JFK, 9/11, FISA Abuse

Free Julian Assange

Even doing just ONE of these things, and the midterms shouldnt be a problem.



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 12:59 AM
link   
Trump says he could use Military or Homeland Security to build the wall if Congress keeps blocking

Then do it Donald. For the sake of putting the brakes on human trafficking and drug trafficking. For the sake of keeping election promises.



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 01:06 AM
link   
Hillary Clinton announced her 1999 run for Senate in a small village called Pindars Corners

Why this small, insignificant village? Maybe because of the name.

Pindar, the Lizard King





Also from Icke’s research:

"Pindar attends the major Satanic ceremonies in Europe and then flies to California for the rituals there".

Later in the book (Biggest Secret), Icke says that,

"Pindar, the ’Marquis de Libeaux’ travels in a white limousine (A ’code-white’ is a code understood by judges, police, the military etc. and it means: look the other way or do not prosecute this person)."

On page 453 of the same book, Icke states that,

" ... the Queen makes cruel remarks about lesser initiates, but is afraid of the man code-named ’Pindar’ (the Marquis de Libeaux) who is higher than her in Satanic rank. Pindar, apparently, bears a resemblance to Prince Charles. Arizona Wilder says that Pindar is Charles’ real father."



Coincidence?
edit on 2018 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 02:56 AM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

are we using David Icke as a legitimate source?

twitter.com...

"Donald #Trump has shown himself to be the American version of Gaddafi in his behaviour towards Iran and the nuclear deal"

twitter.com...

"David Icke exposing Donald #Trump months before he was elected and the nonsensical support for him by deeply naive 'alternative media' sources "

Seems David believes him to be just another controlled puppet



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 03:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

GEOTUS letting you down?



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 03:51 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

One of the more robust and wonderful events we are seeing right now, is the NWO playing their hidden deck in total desperation.

They are outing their own controlled opposition and it is quite the thing at the moment.

Fun to watch.

P



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 03:56 AM
link   
a reply to: pheonix358

the NWO consists of the Rothschilds right? does that include Trump's past relationships with them?



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 04:07 AM
link   



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 04:34 AM
link   
a reply to: XAnarchistX

I have answered this question ... from you ... several times.

Get stuffed mate!

P



posted on Sep, 9 2018 @ 04:35 AM
link   
a reply to: pheonix358

So, yes, Trumps past relationships with the same people you call NWO is noted, but ignored




top topics



 
131
<< 199  200  201    203  204  205 >>

log in

join