TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -73N-

originally posted by: PokeyJoe
a reply to: thepixelpusher

Thats not a confirmed account - could be anybody posing as Sessions. Its curious that Q linked to an unverified account. Although, with all the stuff about Twitter censoring people, who knows?

Regardless of who created the account, its Sessions speaking in the video.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
Wow... some key redacted parts of the FISA application shown in Q #1928 on qntmpkts.keybase.pub..., appear to have MORSE CODE hidden in them!

If true this is flabbergasting as it would mean adding data to a prime document rather than just blacking out bits.

Does anyone else see the dots and dashes in the redacted portions?

Can you explain a bit more? I'm not sure what you mean, Sufi.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: LurkNoMore

I think Comey's tweet is another coded message!

A few words stick out to me and I've put next to them what I think they should be replaced with to see Comey's real message:

TRUTH > DEEPSTATE
TOUCHSTONE > CONSTANT PARTNER
ARE HELD ACCOUNTABLE > WILL BE KILLED
UNTETHERED > UNCHAINED

I think he is warning FIREWALLS not to buckle by saying this:

"Deep state exists and deep state matters. Deepstate has always been the constant partner of our country's judgement system and political life. People who lie will be [187]'d. If we are unchained from deep state, our judgement system cannot function and a society based on our deepstate rules will dissolve."

Oh yeah, Comey is definitely threatening anyone who might be thinking of betraying him.
It's probably already too late. Numerous rats (Lisa Page, Bill Priestap, probably Donna Brazille) have already fled the ship.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I see them on on page 380, are there anymore?

a reply to: Phage

Guaranteed to blow your mind... Anytime....

a reply to: IAMTAT

Look at the Following redacted parts of the FISA app from Qs link in #1928:

Page 11 footnote
Page 12 both footnotes
Page 15 2nd footnote
Page 16 2nd and 3rd paragraphs
Page 17 2nd footnote
Page 19 1st footnote
Page 38 1st and 3rd redaction
Etc.

I believe minus or period are the dots and dash are the dashes.

This only shows in certain places so is conspicuous by the fact it doesn't appear on all redactions.

I'm wondering if these can be converted to morse code to reveal something about those redactions.

a reply to: AnkhMorpork

No they werent.
Why is this just being said now? Two years later? Oh wait I know... The mayor called trump the reality star in the white house that's why...

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Didn't you get the decoder ring?

a reply to: PokeyJoe

Too bad it's already been proven beyond reasonable doubt that Russia did in fact hack the DNC and gave the e mails to wikileaks. Too bad huh?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi


Messages #1925 thru the currrent #1929 are very serious.

a reply to: Skyfloating

Because in this case it was Russia.

a reply to: carewemust

There's nothing serious about this. It's all a game. fake fake fake

a reply to: Sillyolme

Has it really? I must have missed that one. So, just for the record, we now have Julian Assange saying it was not the Russians, and Julian Assange's own mother confirming it was not the Russians, and was in fact Seth Rich. Can you please point me to your rock solid analysis that shows it was "beyond reasonable doubt" that it was the Russians? Also, if youre interested see William Binney's group VIPS analysis of the leak.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

No sorry. This is nonsense. You guys are writing a story here but is complete fiction.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

I'm not surprised you missed it.

a reply to: carewemust

I agree.

In particular, #1927 and #1928.

#1927 fromqntmpkts.keybase.pub... (169) was deleted because the FISA link was incorrect but then instead of correcting that post, Q posts the correction as #1928 (170) and then #1927 is reinstated!

When Q was telling the chans what format the map boards should be he made a point of stressing side by side.

We can now see these posts side by side so I have compared for the difference. The only difference I can see is that, in #1927 The "is" is missing from the phrase "Who is [1 of 4]".

As the "is" is lowercase, is this pointing to the Islamic state of BHOs admin, rather than the IS Islamic state terrorist org?

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I'm wondering if these can be converted to morse code to reveal something about those redactions.

You should try the real world sometime. This sounds like it was written for a comic book.

a reply to: PokeyJoe

 Julian Assange's own mother confirming it was not the Russians

Oh well if julians mommy said so... We should just ignore the intelligence shared by several countries agencies because Julians mommy said so... Give me a flipping break...

a reply to: Sillyolme

Oh, well if YOU said so.....

Can someone on a desktop/laptop post the supposed Morse Code here? I'm on a phone, so I'm unable to access it.