It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: nowayreally
originally posted by: imthegoat
originally posted by: nowayreally
twitter.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">https...://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1006008288318668800?s=20
also to note that the Instagram handle he mentions in his tweet doesn’t come up in a search on IG, nothing at all- not even a private account- “Might want to follow my Insta handle - mjavenatti.”
In addition and probably off base but when Q asks who works on Sundays- ‘they’ posted this on Sunday and sharing intel with us on Sunday- so Q works on Sundays too? Maybe ?
Perhaps he got his instagram handle mixed up. There is a verified @michaelavenatti on instagram. 22 posts and 40k+ followers.
Hmmmm....i don’t know, why give the wrong handle? Why not edit or delete it if it was incorrect? Seems odd to me but what do I know?
Also, new Q posts
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: imthegoat
But what are the range on general SAM missiles? Or sub launched? Did they have to be directly over the area in order for aerial contact from the missile? Ohio class ballistic capable subs are known to transit the hood canal, amidst others I imagine.
Good point about the smoke but you do see the trail from the ground. That also seems to be missing in the video/image from skunk bay.
ETA: Although the one I posted is a bit close the one you posted seems much further away.
I'd guess that they have good range and the target wouldn't have to be right over the area but using the times you mentioned AF1 would have been over/close to Japan at 4am on sunday.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: imthegoat
Anything is possible. The only thing my instinct is telling is that its not a helicopter. All comparable images are of missile/rocket launches. So even if it wasnt aimed at AF1 someone has explaining to do, if they're not capable of launches in that area.
That image is missing the smoke from a missile.
originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: imthegoat
www.metabunk.org...
This is pretty good at explaining it, even superimposing a chopper over it
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: imthegoat
Take-off around 9am saturday pacific time to 4 am sunday pacific time (time the image is captured) is 19 hours.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: imthegoat
Take-off around 9am saturday pacific time to 4 am sunday pacific time (time the image is captured) is 19 hours.
originally posted by: imthegoat
That's still in the realm of possibility. I dont know the weather conditions, if the flight had to be routed around any bad weather, head winds etc. Again, it's not proving anything on either side, but I've been a couple hours late on a flight because of head winds alone.
originally posted by: Whereismypassword
a reply to: imthegoat
When you add the fact that AirlIft Northwest had a helicopter in that area at that time frame it makes it seem the logical outcome
they personally say they were in that area and if not that object filmed they must have seen a missile and they have not said they did
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: imthegoat
That's still in the realm of possibility. I dont know the weather conditions, if the flight had to be routed around any bad weather, head winds etc. Again, it's not proving anything on either side, but I've been a couple hours late on a flight because of head winds alone.
6 hours to 19 hours is more than a couple of hours.
originally posted by: imthegoat
I understand that lol. I'm just saying that everything needs to be accounted for and we dont have all of the information in order to do that. When you're missing crucial facts for an investigation it kind of impedes said investigation. Theres also the other AF1 -- which I dont know if you can find flight schedules for that, if it was even operational.
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: imthegoat
I understand that lol. I'm just saying that everything needs to be accounted for and we dont have all of the information in order to do that. When you're missing crucial facts for an investigation it kind of impedes said investigation. Theres also the other AF1 -- which I dont know if you can find flight schedules for that, if it was even operational.
This would be the "other AF1". AF1 with Trump in it flew across the atlantic and landed in Crete.
If the "Decoy AF1" had flown across canada it would have been over skunk bay at around 3pm Saturday afternoon, local time. 13 hours before the image of the "missile" was captured.
They certainly didn't fly around in circles until 4 am on sunday so that "red october" could take a shot at them.