TH3WH17ERABB17 -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART -9 -

a reply to: IAMTAT

I agree, even though I don't know enough to understand it yet I totally agree with your statement.

a reply to: toysforadults
Reply to IAMTAT

a reply to: pavil

From this tweet, it appears that Avenatti is following Q posts. And is paranoid.

mobile.twitter.com...

It's interesting that the photo posted by Avenetti is not mirrored like Q's photo is.

a reply to: IAMTAT

The FBI has a man-in-the-middle protocol worked out with ISP's I forgot what the name of it is I'm trying to look it up.

en.wikipedia.org...

www.techdirt.com...

a reply to: carewemust

HUH, Different angle to that PIC

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Yes there WAS a 9i in a recent decode. I didn't know how to interpret the 7i in #1763 though... unless it indicates a Q team programme of Missile/Missals with a countdown of each "explosive info release"?

originally posted by: Sabrechucker
a reply to: carewemust

HUH, Different angle to that PIC

Its not a mirror image, but one looking straight on at the guy. Compare the stop sign in both images and you'll see what I mean.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

Warning PDF--- worth a look i-9 is the employee eligibility form for ICE and Dept of Homeland SEC

www.ice.gov...

a reply to: carewemust

and the orange triangle

a reply to: XAnarchistX

Fascinating. It's sort of like a sophisticated version of A/B testing, the goals of which might be 1) to learn how large a crowd of followers a good PSYOP can formulate; and, 2) record the resulting socio-psychological statistical data for analysis; and, 3) perfect the PSYOP and weaponize it to manipulate, control and move the masses.

Wait. That's already been done, hasn't it?

originally posted by: carewemust
From this tweet, it appears that Avenatti is following Q posts. And is paranoid.

mobile.twitter.com...

It's interesting that the photo posted by Avenetti is not mirrored like Q's photo is.

I replied to him.
Said that I heard the guys name was Pedestrian Passerby, and that it sounds British.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: Spruce
These "decryptions" of Q messages are hysterical. This is another reason I think we may be being played.

NOBODY has worked harder or contributed more to these threads than RelSciHistItSufi!

IF you ever come up with anything of any real value to contribute to this thread beyond flinging s#it from the shrubbery...then MAYBE you'll be worthy to comment on what he has done here.

This isn't personal. Stop making it personal.

Grasping at straws is fruitless.

What this amounts to, no matter who is doing it, is plugging stuff into an acronym dictionary and guessing which one applies to the message.

We may as well shoot darts at a phone book.

originally posted by: carewemust
From this tweet, it appears that Avenatti is following Q posts. And is paranoid.

HA! They called the PD? And said what exactly? "There was a man on the street - please arrest him for being on the street"

...unless this man was in his office.

a reply to: butcherguy

If avenetti invites you into his office to give a sworn statement, do not do it. You would be floating down the river shortly afterwards.

a reply to: Sabrechucker

Different angle could be because it's cropped to remove the wing mirror? Note how not all the STOP sign is in Avenatti's pic but it is in Q's pic. Also the bottom of A's pic is in line with above the triangle!

If it was a different angle then it would imply 2 different picture taken from the car at the same time; one in wing mirror and one looking out of back window. However the shadows are similar so same pic.

ETA the Avenatti pic has a black speck circle on right at hand height. Looks like Avenatti may have reversed pic then taken pic of that with his phone to make it easy tweet upload?

originally posted by: XAnarchistX
a reply to: carewemust

and the orange triangle

It has been cropped out. It looks like a mirror of Q's.

"Let's put this baby to bed. In no way possible is this anything other than a missle/rocket!" -quote

One question regarding the whole missle narrative. Perhaps I've missed it.

Could it even be technically possible for it to be an attack on AF1?
What kind of missle could it have been?
Where was AF1 at that time?
Was Af1 even in range of any known kind of sub launched missle?

a reply to: djohn554

Apparently both avenetti and Cohen like manipulating images and recordings.

a reply to: RelSciHistItSufi

I do.. Would the black dot on right of A's pic be evidence of that?

ETA - answered