Senate Says, "Hell yes, Putin wanted Trump for President

a reply to: notsure1

‘Twas a joke lol

a reply to: UKTruth

Well perhaps the NSA get a pass as they effectively said 'we have no idea.. could be true, might not be'

No.

a reply to: c2oden

You didn't read the report? You haven't been paying attention for the past year or so?
It's quite well laid out what active measures were being taken.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: sine.nomine

So what's the problem again?

Nutshell,

Trump says "Putin says he didn't" do it. The administration taken no stand against further Russian influence.

Or, is that not a problem?

Of course they took a further stance. I stated part of it in my previous reply when they said we need to rely on paper ballots to avoid electronic fraud. He also supported the FBI investigating suspected spies in his own campaign. You're just being willfully ignorant at this point. So again, where did Trump lie? Or did you give up on that point?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: c2oden

You didn't read the report? You haven't been paying attention for the past year or so?
It's quite well laid out what active measures were being taken.

I have been paying attention.
What active measures were being taken?

One has to wonder if they'll ever get around to the part where they'll recognize that 2016 wasn't the first time this almost exact scenario played out...

Or if they'll ever question why a bunch of extreme leftists used the platforms of a bunch of other extreme leftists who was known to meet with an extreme leftist in power in this country more often than he did his own cabinet. Or why he'd order his own people meant to protect us from this type of intrusion to stand down and would continue to publicly mock anyone who dare say the aforementioned original extreme leftists were the top global threat.

Curious, in fact.

The HRC Campaign helped Trump more than Putin ever did.

It is a known fact that the Democrats, believing Trump to be the weakest candidate, put tremendous effort and cash into pushing for Trump to win the Republican nomination, believing he would be easy to beat.

Money well spent Democrats.

a reply to: sine.nomine

Of course they took a further stance.

Where's the administration's policy on Russian interference? You have a link?

He also supported the FBI investigating suspected spies in his own campaign.

Yup. But not for any investigation into Russian interference. Because it's hoax. Right?

So again, where did Trump lie?

Surely you jest.

a reply to: c2oden

Sorry. You'll have to do your own catch up work on that.

This thread is about the Senate Intelligence Committee report and how it contradicts the House Republicans report and the administration's narrative.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Zanti Misfit

Isn't Adam " Shifty " Schiff and a plethora of other Socialists and Republican Deep State RHINO's on that committee

No.
You could at least try to sound like you know what you're talking about.

We could say the same about you. Opposite Xuechen.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: c2oden

Sorry. You'll have to do your own catch up work on that.
This thread is about the Senate Intelligence Committee report.

You don't like it when someone uses your own tactics on you, do you?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha

Highly likely.

But Putin wanted Trump to be president and screwed around to try to make sure he was.

So if Hillary hadn't sabotaged herself she still wouldn't be presidon't?

I don't buy that. She lost fair and square.

Popular vote means nothing when Cali and New York are knee deep in fantasyland.

The real world is what matters, and the real world elected Mr. Trump.

a reply to: Phage

The Committee finds the difference in confidence levels between the NSA and the CIA and FBI on the assessment that "Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump's election chances" appropriately represents analytic differences and was reached in a professional and transparent manner.

In all the interviews of those who drafted and prepared the ICA, the Committee heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach any conclusions.

From your source.

Did they forget about Peter Strzok?


ETA

We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump2.

So they think that Russia undermined the public faith in the U.S. democratic process? lol. Did they register dead people to vote? So it was'nt the actions of the Clinton's that harmed her electability? lmao. What a load of crap
They had a clear preference for President-elect Trump. Yeah. So did I.

Some people just never let go.

This thread reminds me of Geraldos special on the Capone vaults, lol.

Nobody cares what Putin whats and intel reports are going to state the obvioua for those that do care.

Other then the usual dead horse beating, show us some hard russian collusion proof so we can rally behind the Mighty Noodler!!!

If not, meh 😪

originally posted by: Phage
Where's the administration's policy on Russian interference? You have a link?

Yeah. Your CNN article.

Yup. But not for any investigation into Russian interference. Because it's hoax. Right?

You mean that investigation going on right now? Yeah, that would never happen. /sarc

Surely you jest.

Surely, you have proof then?

a reply to: Phage

Who wouldn’t want Trump as president?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: NarcolepticBuddha

Highly likely.

But Putin wanted Trump to be president and screwed around to try to make sure he was.

Naw, Puttin likely thought Hillary was going to win like everyone else on the planet thought, he undermined her support in any way to get the upper hand when she took office. There is no evidence he tried to get Trump to win.

Putin is likely thrown for a loop and doesn't know how to deal with Trump, since Trump wins at everything and already smacked down Putin's attempts in Syria to undermine him.

The main thing that effects Russia is the price of a barrel of oil on the market. Their economy is entirely based on it. Trump got Saudi Arabia to keep the price low on the world market, it is like kicking Putin in the gonads.

a reply to: highvein

Did they forget about Peter Strzok?

I don't know.
Was Strzok one of the analysts they interviewed?

originally posted by: c2oden

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: c2oden

You didn't read the report? You haven't been paying attention for the past year or so?
It's quite well laid out what active measures were being taken.

I have been paying attention.
What active measures were being taken?

He was talking war . He was trying to scare Americans into voting for Trump. Remember that interview with all those reporters him talking about war and all their advancements in the last 20 years?

Then they had there people doing nuclear war drills .. They were basically saying hillary got elected there was gonna be war.

It was obvious to me back then.

a reply to: Phage

Yes.
So the Senate IC basically said. 'We agree with NSA who don't really know'