It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Senate Says, "Hell yes, Putin wanted Trump for President

page: 4
62
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:24 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck




Oh, so Russia wants us to sanction them. OK, hadn't thought of that.

No. But Congress did, and Trump finally acceded. Like he did with the family separation thing.

Why is Trump on Putin's side? "He says he didn't do anything."


edit on 7/4/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: seagull




I do find it interesting that they contradict each other though... Kinda surprised me.

You're surprised that a bipartisan report contradicts the Nunes report?

I'm not.



They sided with the DOJ/FBI and dismissed the NSA assessment. The word bipartisan means Trump hating Dems along with Never Trumper GOP Senators were a part of the mix, ho hum nothing to see here, must be totally on the up and up eh?

Meanwhile nobody is asking why Obama stood down while bending over for another Putin reaming during the election. Putin always got what he wanted with Obama around, see Crimea, so of course he is going to try to undermine Hillary who everyone on the planet thought was going to win.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:25 AM
link   
The ICA provided zero evidence to back up their claims/ opinions. The only thing we did see was hugely discrediting to them. Their report was laughable.

I guess there is waning interest in the Senate IC views or anyone else's. It's just another opinion layered on someone else's opinion. Meaningless garbage.

Also, so what if Putin wanted Trump to win. It just shows he is a normal human being. Every normal human being on earth wanted Trump to win.

Now, if someone were able to provide some evidence that Trump or his campaign were working illegally with Putin to win the election then I am sure there would be some interest. So far nada. So this all looks like a bunch of cry babies hurt because of the election result droning on about a fantasy.
edit on 4/7/2018 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)

edit on 4/7/2018 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:25 AM
link   
It was so obvious back thn that Russia wanted Trump over Hillary.

Remember all the amped up nuclear war talk? He had his people doing nuclear drills .

I made a thread way back before the election ( on another account) saying it seemed pretty obvious what they were doing.

But no matter how much you really really need it too it does not mean Trump had anything to do with it.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: Muninn

originally posted by: c2oden
After my election i'll have more flexibility...
Who said that to Putin?


Nobody.


Sorry.
It was Medevedev.
Who said he would transmit to Putin.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:26 AM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP




They sided with the DOJ/FBI and dismissed the NSA assessment.

Not really



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:26 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth




The ICA provided zero evidence to back up their claims/ opinions.
Presented evidence to whom?
To you? Well that's surprising.


edit on 7/4/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:28 AM
link   
a reply to: notsure1




But no matter how much you really really need it too it does not mean Trump had anything to do with it.


Why does Trump take Putin's side? "He says he didn't do anything."



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP




They sided with the DOJ/FBI and dismissed the NSA assessment.

Not really


Yes, really, or else they would have went with the NSA assessment and made the DOJ/FBI assessment a footnote.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: sine.nomine




I would need a source for when he stated the ICA stated that.

So, he made it up. He often does that.
www.cnn.com...

The report itself says they don't know how it affected the outcome. Maybe they worded it different to him. Maybe he remembered it wrong. Maybe he lied. You're upset over what may turn out to be a inadvertent representation of facts.

I suppose we'll see in the end. But it's possible they told him they have no evidence of Russian impact because they don't.


+8 more 
posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:28 AM
link   
Sometimes it seems like Putin likes America a lot more then the liberal in America do.

If Putin did anything to hobble Hillary, he did us all a favor. Case closed



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

We saw their nonsense report. It was an embarrassment to them.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:29 AM
link   
Some will not give up on Russia.
Bless your hearts.
It is done.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:29 AM
link   
a reply to: visitedbythem

It usually seems that Trump likes Putin more than he likes our allies.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:29 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Yes. Nunes' report was a joke, wasn't it?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: visitedbythem

It usually seems that Trump likes Putin more than he likes our allies.


Like who?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:30 AM
link   


Senate Says, "Hell yes, Putin wanted Trump for President

Is that like "Simon Says"?
Is Senate's first name Simon ?
Who is Senate ?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Phage

Isn't Adam " Shifty " Schiff and a plethora of other Socialists and Republican Deep State RHINO's on that committee ? So this Report has Credibility Because Someone Opines it Does ? .....Ah , NO .......


Go back to the opening post. It says right there bipartisan report. First sentence.



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:32 AM
link   
a reply to: TinfoilTP




Yes, really, or else they would have went with the NSA assessment and made the DOJ/FBI assessment a footnote.

What was the NSA assessment. Will you quote it?



posted on Jul, 4 2018 @ 12:32 AM
link   
a reply to: sine.nomine




You're upset over what may turn out to be a inadvertent representation of facts.

One of many "inadvertent" misrepresentations.

edit on 7/4/2018 by Phage because: (no reason given)







 
62
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join