It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judiciary Committee hearing on IG report - Wray and Rosenstein - 6/28 live feed

page: 11
22
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

They don't seem particularly worried. Contempt of Congress isn't sending anyone to jail lol.
I don't think this is forcing anyone's hand. They still aren't entitled to information from a current investigation nor are they entitled to classified information. No matter how hard they stamp their feet.




posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: queenofswords

They're not investigating Hillary any more.


Yes they are and I dont know how many times you have to be told this. The FBI reopened her investigation in January of 2018.

* - Justice Department reopens Hillary Clinton email investigation by Kelly Cohen | January 04, 2018 11:16 AM

* - Justice Department ‘Looking Into’ Hillary Clinton’s Emails— Again It’s the most scrutinized email server of all time. But the president is demanding it get scrutinized again. And DOJ is taking a fresh look. Betsy Woodruff Betsy Woodruff 01.04.18 10:00 AM ET
edit on 28-6-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Agit8dChop

They don't seem particularly worried. Contempt of Congress isn't sending anyone to jail lol.
I don't think this is forcing anyone's hand. They still aren't entitled to information from a current investigation nor are they entitled to classified information. No matter how hard they stamp their feet.


They just cited the actual law.

boing boing boing

💥😎💥



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:35 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




Affiliation meant nothing to Strzok and Page either

Now you're getting it. Baby steps.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:37 PM
link   
They just cited a lie by Comey !!

About the iPhone thing.

BwaaaaaHaHaHa

😃💥Sun💥Burn💥😃



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen




Affiliation meant nothing to Strzok and Page either

Now you're getting it. Baby steps.


Good thing Mueller threw Strzok off the case.

(good try at out of context too on your part)

You're "getting it" (and boy are you)

😎



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

Contempt of Congress has jail time as a penalty -


2 U.S. Code § 192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papers

Every person who having been summoned as a witness by the authority of either House of Congress to give testimony or to produce papers upon any matter under inquiry before either House, or any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or any committee of either House of Congress, willfully makes default, or who, having appeared, refuses to answer any question pertinent to the question under inquiry, shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 nor less than $100 and imprisonment in a common jail for not less than one month nor more than twelve months.


edit on 28-6-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

They were looking for a triple play putting those three up to bat one after the other.
Bob Goodlatte was supposed to bring them all home.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:43 PM
link   
Another rhetorical red herring coming as "pressing" ....

😃



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra


Doesn't the House-passed resolution require requested documents to be produced to Congress by the end of the day July 7, 2018?

If not produced, it would be best for Trump to fire Rosenstein. Avoid the long impeachment process.


Edit: I see that 7/7/2018 is indeed the deadline.
www.usatoday.com...

edit on 6/28/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:45 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

So Issa (Republican) asked Rosenstein if he was not above the law that if congress holds you in contempt the Grand Jury shall be convened - Rosenstein came back with a response saying they are not in contempt, and making that threat is a crime? Did I understand that statement correctly?

It seems that we just saw threats go back and forth - one a threat of contempt, and the other a passive threat that saying something like that is a crime?



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Xcathdra


Doesn't the House-passed resolution require requested documents to be produced to Congress by the end of the day July 7, 2018?

If not produced, it would be best for Trump to fire Rosenstein. Avoid the long impeachment process.


I thought Nunes put the time limit on compliance. I am not sure what the measure they passed today said other than a demand to turn over the documents in question.

Nunes said if they dont comply then they will begin impeachment. I think the vote today was to reinforce that impeachment threat by showing the house is behind Nunes on that issue.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: SonOfThor
a reply to: xuenchen

So Issa (Republican) asked Rosenstein if he was not above the law that if congress holds you in contempt the Grand Jury shall be convened - Rosenstein came back with a response saying they are not in contempt, and making that threat is a crime? Did I understand that statement correctly?

It seems that we just saw threats go back and forth - one a threat of contempt, and the other a passive threat that saying something like that is a crime?


Yeah kinda

🎃



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: SonOfThor

The difference is members of Congress are protected in this hearing by the speech and debate clause of the Constitution. Rosenstein on the other hand has no such protection.
edit on 28-6-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra


Here's a summary of what the just-passed resolution enables Congress to do.

www.usatoday.com...



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

They aren't investigating Hillary any more.
No matter how much bull# you link.
Looking into looking into isn't an investigation. Entertaining requests to look into something isn't an investigation.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:50 PM
link   
RR just admitted again he (and Wray) don't know "The Names" and those are typically "Masked" !!!!!!

Deep State exists.

💥😃💥



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: SonOfThor


Rosenstein has already threatened Congress to back-off, or else.
www.foxnews.com...



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Xcathdra

They aren't investigating Hillary any more.
No matter how much bull# you link.
Looking into looking into isn't an investigation. Entertaining requests to look into something isn't an investigation.


Once again denying reality and facts.

Ignorance is a choice.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:51 PM
link   
RR just referred to "Executive Privilege"

OhOh

😃



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join