It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judiciary Committee hearing on IG report - Wray and Rosenstein - 6/28 live feed

page: 10
22
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Irishhaf
So no amazing moment where the guilty were exposed, lots of grand standing on both sides of the aisle and more than likely the upper level criminals will continue to be covered by the red tape brigade.


That about sum things up?


Yes. Perfectly.




posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:49 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian
I agree Gowdy is hilarious.
I expected him to stand on a soap box with his hand waving it in air.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: introvert




Please provide the complete context. Explain it to me. I'm open to other options.

now you want others to clean up your mess? it was your half assed quote you find the rest of it



No. I said no such thing.

oh so you agree there should be no investigation into obstruction? good i agree




I fail to see you provide any real legitimate rebuttal.

of course you do not
seeing as how you "do not think anything will come of it".




Again, you do not seem to be making much sense.

Whether or not I think anything will come of it has nothing to do with your ability to provide a legitimate response.

Why do I have to explain something so simple to a grown adult?



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: theantediluvian
I agree Gowdy is hilarious.
I expected him to stand on a soap box with his hand waving it in air.


He's politicking.

I really hoped he had come to his senses and was getting out of that crap.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: theantediluvian
I agree Gowdy is hilarious.
I expected him to stand on a soap box with his hand waving it in air.


He's politicking.

I really hoped he had come to his senses and was getting out of that crap.


I was thinking the same. Gowdy is obviously an intelligent guy, but his propensity for theatrics, as we saw from the Benghazi/Email hearings, is too over the top for me.

He likes putting on a show for the suckers at home.
edit on 28-6-2018 by introvert because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:55 AM
link   
We are backkkkkkk



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: EchoesInTime

So put them under oath and ask them.



Like if these people would EVER tell the truth...

Just ask Comey.



Those people ,as you call them, are Jordan's aids who he says he believes. I'll leave that in your lap.
Rosenstein named everybody in the room at the time and said he did not threaten anyone. It's just another lie. So here we agree. Those people lie. But I don't think you meant those people. Lol.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: EchoesInTime

And they are going to be told no.
Again.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:00 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

It just seems to me that both Wray and Rosenstein are juggling between keeping confidentiality tight and answering what they CAN answer. This is probably because the same people implicated in one investigation are connected to the other and it goes deeper than just having classified info on a personal email account.

That is peanuts compared to what is really being investigated, and since the connections are so intertwined, and it is so important to keep leaks plugged and the investigation clean, Wray and Rosenstein are walking a tight rope.

I think Jordan and Gowdy, and a couple of others actually KNOW and think it is time to reveal it all. But, the DOJ and Mueller's team have one last 'i' to dot and one last 't' to cross.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: BlueAjah

They're not back yet.
He's just going to tell them the same thing. You can't have information from an ongoing investigation. You are not going to get classified information so quit asking.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

I think you know exactly who I meant.

And if you do, it's because you know it too.

Or at least your subconscious do.


edit on 28/6/2018 by vinifalou because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:10 PM
link   
LOL, Nadler did not let Rosenstein finish his answer to the question on whether or not the American people will view the Mueller investigation as a waste of time.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:12 PM
link   
a reply to: queenofswords

They're not investigating Hillary any more.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:16 PM
link   
a reply to: vinifalou

I know who I was talking about. I know you thought it was someone else not Jordan's aids.
That's the bottom line. So don't try and get cute with your answer now.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:17 PM
link   
Here is the exchange between Jim Jordan and RR.




posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Thejoncrichton

Gold in them there hills !

πŸ’₯😎πŸ’₯



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:21 PM
link   
LOL

Rep Gutierrez throwing red herrings.

Multiple red herrings.

πŸ’₯πŸ˜ƒπŸ’₯



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:22 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert




Again, you do not seem to be making much sense.

same ole canned response from you when things don't go your way



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

You're assuming there is documentation that shows corruption within those agencies.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 12:26 PM
link   
RR just admitted he doesn't know what Hillary Clinton documents are still not turned over to the Committees !!

More proof that stuff is being suppressed and hidden from inside the agencies !!

πŸ˜ƒ



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join