It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judiciary Committee hearing on IG report - Wray and Rosenstein - 6/28 live feed

page: 8
22
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Well .. son-of-a ...

Yep, we all make mistakes, don't we?





posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Xcathdra

I think it interesting and highly enlightening when Rosenstein quickly jumped in with, "I'm not the one doing the redacting..." as if to distance himself from that process as much as possible.


Which makes it obvious the "Redactors" (aka "Reviewers") are tainted with implants and left overs.

😎

RR between 2 rocks and 2 hard places at the same time.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Xcathdra

I think it interesting and highly enlightening when Rosenstein quickly jumped in with, "I'm not the one doing the redacting..." as if to distance himself from that process as much as possible.


Which makes it obvious the "Redactors" (aka "Reviewers") are tainted with implants and left overs.

😎

RR between 2 rocks and 2 hard places at the same time.



The only thing that is obvious is how desperately some folks to spin factual statements like that.

Rosenstein is responding to partisan nonsense (odd, as he is a Republican himself.)

Did someone say something about "eating their own"?



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra

Well .. son-of-a ...

Yep, we all make mistakes, don't we?



No worries man.. I make my fair share of them.




posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xcathdra

AAG Rosenstein did take the accusation that he was "hiding" material from Congress personally and rightfully so.

You're merely giving your opinion as unimpeachable fact.

No, the only reason to redact a document is not to hide "inappropriate" contact -- how absurd would that be to send to a bloodthirsty Congress?

I am not disparaging your experience or your opinion, but you tend to reprsent both here as fact ... and that's just not always accurate.


I like the new you.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: EchoesInTime

So put them under oath and ask them.



Like if these people would EVER tell the truth...

Just ask Comey.




posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: BrennanHuff

They are on a break for a vote. It will resume shortly.




posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner

Eh?

Pretty much the same as the old me ... but thanks.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: vinifalou

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: EchoesInTime

So put them under oath and ask them.



Like if these people would EVER tell the truth...

Just ask Comey.



or be placed under oath - Clinton.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:08 AM
link   

originally posted by: EchoesInTime
a reply to: BrennanHuff

They are on a break for a vote. It will resume shortly.



House passes Measure Demanding Just. Dept hand over Documents



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:09 AM
link   
a reply to: BrennanHuff




These guys get so fired up that they miss answers like these, which should've led to the question of who does the redacting(unless i missed the followup)
Just a guess but probably the lawyers who are similarly tasked with advising Strozk not to respond .



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner

Eh?

Pretty much the same as the old me ... but thanks.


I don't think I can agree.

You seem much more... reasonable lately. I hope you don't take that the wrong way.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner




posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
LOL looks like that House "Resolution" might pass !!!!!

😃💥



sure did


224 ayes
184 noes

right across party lines



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: Agit8dChop

originally posted by: xuenchen
LOL looks like that House "Resolution" might pass !!!!!

😃💥



sure did


224 ayes
184 noes

right across party lines


A vote which proves what exactly? Rank partisanship?

PFft.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:14 AM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


I don't see anything about political affiliation in the few profiles I looked at. Do I need to read all of them? Did you?
Wray and Rosenstein just said it's not information they have. But trump seems to believe he does. Or it's just more lies spewing from his mouth.
The Mueller team takes up two floors of the justice department. Two floors.
Probably sixty people or more. Do you think they are all acting against trump with bias? That's rather paranoid if so.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Both Democrats and Republicans are staging these "hearings" as nothing more than political theatre fodder so that the respective extremist media can play this divisive BS 24/7.



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

Did they tell Rosenstein it passed?
Does he look like he might get sick?



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

proves for one Republicans are united behind this
it reaffirms that Republicans have a majority

will it make RR, Wray, FBI and DOJ act lawfully and provide documents showing the corruption inside their agencies?
probably not.. but its another step in the right direction



posted on Jun, 28 2018 @ 11:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Rosenstein isn't taking the bait so far.



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join