It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: enlightenedservant
This is also why illegal immigration crackdowns never address or target the businesses doing the exploiting.
It's easier to attack the "others" instead of people considered respectable businessmen.
President Donald Trump hired hundreds of undocumented Polish immigrants to demolish a New York City building in 1980 and paid them as little as $4 an hour without providing proper safety equipment to do the job, court documents show.
The workers and their contractor, William Kaszycki of Kaszycki & Sons, sued Trump for unfair labor practices in 1983. After litigation dragged on for 15 years, Trump ultimately paid $1.375 million to settle the case.
“We worked in horrid, terrible conditions,” Wojciech Kozak, one of the undocumented Polish workers at the demolition site, told the Times. “We were frightened illegal immigrants and did not know enough about our rights.”
The settlement was kept under seal for nearly two decades. But last week, in response to a motion filed by Time Inc. and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, U.S. District Court Judge Loretta A. Preska ordered the documents be made public.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: saint4God
I'm sure you checked the laborors for their green card to didn't you?
originally posted by: Mandroid7
Your example sounds racist.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
The carpenters union isn't a small group of carpenters. It is the biggest. Ot does the most building in the country.
You are making a bs argument about an industry you have zero knowledge of.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
If your going to make a trash talking thread from the title on, at least put it in the mudpit.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
Sorry pal, but open borders are a threat to national security in many ways, From backpack bombers, to drug mules, to social and medical services, to job reduction.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
There great for democrats wanting voters who will pass their nazi policies though.
Americans aren't that stupid, but dangle citizenship carrot in front of some 3rd "worlders" and maybe they can push their garbage through.
Throw a little "think of the children" on top for the gullible, emotion-based liberals and you have the makings of a policy change.
It's obvious what is going on with this.
originally posted by: TonyS
Well, no insult intended, but your last paragraph sounds derned near delusional.
originally posted by: TonyS
If you want to solve the problem, there are basically two ways to do that.
1) Set up a truly simplistic "Guest Worker" Visa program to be administered either in US Embassies/Consulates in Mexico/Central America/South America/Canada..........anywhere/whatever OR at Border Crossing Facilities. Basically, you tag'em and bag'em; issue a photo ID, get all their particulars such as relatives contacts both inside and outside the US and the location they plan to reside in, even if only temporarily while seeking work. Let'em transit back and forth across the border as much as they want to......who cares. I would also suggest a health screening.
originally posted by: TonyS
2) Simply grant dual citizenship to the residents of the "Americas" wherein they can apply for a US Passport and Social Security ID at the US Embassies. That would also enable them to vote in our elections, but considering the quality of pond scum in office today, I don't have a problem with that.
originally posted by: TonyS
Problem solved.
originally posted by: TonyS
Mexico is a perfect example of just how ridiculous this problem is. I checked! I know a Mexican Attorney. He's told me that Mexicans get birth certificates when they're born; they have to use them to get Mexican Driver's licenses. Mexico knows who these people are................with a little bit of work, US officials could as well.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: saint4God
Well, how about a question to answer a question.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
Which is smarter, letting anyone who wants to come here in, or them fixing their own countries problems instead?
originally posted by: Blaine91555
Ask yourself why is it that people fleeing bad countries segregate themselves, speak of the country they fled as superior to the US even though they ran away from their own country because it was so bad?
originally posted by: Blaine91555
Why do they not fight to fix their own countries?
originally posted by: Blaine91555
There is no reason for instance Mexico is not as prosperous as the US. Educated citizens and plenty of natural resources say they should be our equal? So why do they run away to here?
They do it because they can. Because they know the border is weak and our laws are not enforced, so they take the weak persons way out, rather than changing their own countries.
originally posted by: Blaine91555
Of course on top of that you have those who wish us harm and the drug cartel's and human traffickers taking advantage of the same weaknesses. Imagine what they would do if the border were suddenly open!
originally posted by: Blaine91555
a reply to: saint4God
No government can stand up to its populace if they truly want change. People who sit on comfy chairs, do so because many shed blood to make it that way. This country people are fleeing to fought a war against another country and a civil war to make it this way. Those who flee the US are mostly criminals who lie about why they left this country.
My opinion is a bit harsh, but it was formed after a family member was slaughtered by and Illegal in a sanctuary city. A man driven to the border by the Mexican government and helped to cross the border after being convicted of five brutal rapes in southern Mexico. A man who had assaulted three women prior to the murder and then let loose even though, according to the detective on that case, they knew who he was and what he had done in Mexico. Her death was the direct result of the weak border and scum bags who think her life was worth less than that of the Mexican criminal who should have never been here. Who they knew all about and refused to do anything about even though he had assaulted three women on the streets before.
This all looks very different to victims of this insanity, all for political reasons. Her death lies directly on the shoulders of those who want sanctuary cities and weak border enforcement. Her death and many others I'm sure, not to mention the victims of the drug cartels and human traffickers that people love to ignore.
Only an incompetent government would not have policies to protect it's own citizens and only political insanity can explain sanctuary cities. Those for them are willing to overlook the victims as they plea for weak borders from comfy chair's.
Yes we do need a way for workers, who already have jobs and sponsors to come here to work as needed, but we also need a strong border and strong enforcement to stop the criminals, drug gangs and traffickers from making us victims. It's just plain old nuts to think otherwise.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: MarkOfTheV
Yes its why I was so thrilled with Trump mentioning trade skills in his state of the union address, we have shoved massive student debt down the throats of people that don't need it for far to many years.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
The fact everything has been bilingual in the US for at least 10 years is a pretty good sign we're not assimilating people as fast as they are coming in. So in a word, no.
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I understand what you are trying to say but the plaque is just a poem that won a contest.
The poem is not a contract, not a law, and it is not a free pass.
originally posted by: saint4God
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: MarkOfTheV
Yes its why I was so thrilled with Trump mentioning trade skills in his state of the union address, we have shoved massive student debt down the throats of people that don't need it for far to many years.
Many citizens growing up here have a choice, either massive debt and less physical labour or little/no debt and a lot of physical labour. I'm not entirely sure why this is, but I would prefer a long-term sustainable job with debt rather than getting injured and unable to work. These are two extremes of the equation, but a simplified version of the message our society sends to young career-minded folk. My father's truism is, "You can work with your mind, or you can work with your back".