UK Youtuber found guilty of hate crime for teaching dog nazi salute

Were almost there.....

originally posted by: Grambler
a reply to: Hazardous1408

I hear things that offend me all of the time. Like you cheering for steve scalise to have been shot.

yet I dont suggest arresting people who say things I find offensive. Not once. Ever.

There should be no laws, at all, to make speech illegal for offending people.

You feel you should have the right to cheer for a would be murderer shooting a politicians you dont like, and call for the deaths of all pro life politicians, while arbitraily saying people should be aarrested for telling jokes you find offensive.

That is what is disgusting and astounding.

That's ok, they will be parted out to save real Americans when the War starts.

Oh grow up people!

Head shots so as not to damage the goods.

Lib brains are worthless anyway.

Hmmm, I should watch some Walking dead.

So is there an animal control?

What's next, Parrots that swear or cat call?

Let's arrest the "Trump sucks" crowd!

Pugs have always been rebels.

They were bred for rat patrol on ships.

By the english!


I have one

Doesn't matter what words I say, it's how I say it that excites them.

My pug likes to attack cookiemonkey.

She has plenty of monkey's, donkeymonkey, chickenmonkey, even monkeymonkey.

This vid and response is so frigging stupid it might as well be american.

a reply to: Grambler

Who is to say you were mocking?

Common sense, really.

The man from the OP says in the video he just wanted to make the dog be as uncute as possible.

And “only wanted” his girlfriend and his people to see it, yeah...
So he recorded it, uploaded it, then kept it up even after generating untold amounts of traffic and views...

He quite obviously contradicted his stated motive with his actual actions.


Probably why I “don’t buy that joke”.


Have a good evening, Grambler...
May our next interaction bring us closer in understanding than this one, lol.
Peace, fella!

Saddens me quite a bit that there are people on ATS that think this was a good thing....

We are so screwed...

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Saddens me quite a bit that there are people on ATS that think this was a good thing....

We are so screwed...

Its in poor taste, but does that warrant all of this?

It amazes me that so many that are against the war on drugs are ok with the war on words.

originally posted by: Grambler
I could see a case in the next few years were someone draws Mohammed and is charged with inciting violence. And from their, its a stones throw away from outlawing other offensive jokes.

I doubt this as well as it already happened and no district attorney filed a suit.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

holy crap i totally forgot that movie existed.
I'm watching that tonight if i can find it online.

a reply to: Grambler

As long as it wasn’t the Queen doing a Nazi salute then I guess it is OK!

Uhhhhh,.. shouldn’t the dog be under arrest and facing charges too???

Oh, it was “just following orders”!!

(Yep, going to h3ll for that... or maybe a ban from ATS, but that is what happens when the weird turns pro!)

a reply to: Wardaddy454

A far cry from cheering someone getting shot because they are pro-life.

Was actually quite a bit more than just a “pro-life” argument I was making at the time, considering I detest abortion myself it’d be a bit weird to want others dead for that alone.

Pretty sure it was to do with a vote he backed in regards to pregnant women at risk of life threatening outcomes and his vote fitting my criteria for “endangering a demographic of the population he is supposed to serve”... But yeah.

Tomaytas Tomartas

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: Wardaddy454

A far cry from cheering someone getting shot because they are pro-life.

Was actually quite a bit more than just a “pro-life” argument I was making at the time, considering I detest abortion myself it’d be a bit weird to want others dead for that alone.

Pretty sure it was to do with a vote he backed in regards to pregnant women at risk of life threatening outcomes and his vote fitting my criteria for “endangering a demographic of the population he is supposed to serve”... But yeah.

Tomaytas Tomartas

Justify it any way you need to, doesn't change the fact that you're trying to compare apples to oranges.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Irishhaf
Saddens me quite a bit that there are people on ATS that think this was a good thing....

We are so screwed...

Its in poor taste, but does that warrant all of this?

It amazes me that so many that are against the war on drugs are ok with the war on words.

Does anyone not know dogs?!


I can say, I need a 1/4 in drill bit!!!

And make them crazy.

I also can say, who is a good doggie. they know doggie.

The #ing dog is responding to the masters voice and emotion.

Not what he is saying.

Wtf is wrong with people?!

a reply to: Hazardous1408

So you think he literally wanted to gas jews?

Of course he didnt as common sense would tell you.

Again, your joke is ok, his is criminal.

a reply to: Wardaddy454

It’s cute that you think I am trying to justify myself...
It was actually a correction to a falsehood.

You know, like apples and oranges.

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: Wardaddy454

It’s cute that you think I am trying to justify myself...
It was actually a correction to a falsehood.

You know, like apples and oranges.

You felt the need to respond, so maybe you are.

And it looked more like an explanation than a correction to a falsehood.

#ing english people are stupider than dogs,

That's what I get from this.

Sure, the guy was saying stuff that pisses people off but so what?!

Use the dog to convict?! Evidence?!!!

Seriously?!!

Caesar would be pissed too.

Just an observation.
These days it seems the people most offended are offended for someone else.
I'll bet most of the people offended over this aren't even Jewish.

a reply to: Wardaddy454

Responding is kinda the idea of this site when you’ve been tagged/quoted, more of a courtesy than a need that was felt.

...cheering someone getting shot because they are pro-life.

If this is demonstrably not what happened, which word would you choose other than “falsehood”?

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: Wardaddy454

Responding is kinda the idea of this site when you’ve been tagged/quoted, more of a courtesy than a need that was felt.

...cheering someone getting shot because they are pro-life.

If this is demonstrably not what happened, which word would you choose other than “falsehood”?

Or you would rather just have the last word.

If? It either is or isn't. Is it more of a falsehood then to say you cheered because of a vote then?

A hate crime???
what are thies people Nazis?
A joke is a joke.
any fool can see he just meant it as a joke.
but they are not just Any fool!

Truth and freedom of expression is the new hate speech.

Welcome to the national socialist british workers party.