It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The overview you pose is far from a given, from what I can see.
I think he really screws up some things, but I think he hit a home run with North Korea so far.
originally posted by: nwtrucker
First, congratulating Putin in nothing but a social response. Both know it.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: DogStarIn1066
I appreciate honest attempts as that is hopefully the basis of my own little attempts at debate or discussion
You say
I think he really screws up some things, but I think he hit a home run with North Korea so far.
Inthis I can agree, if. If his threatening really had anything to do with it, or if his international dealing with others forces of which we are unsure, such as pressure from N Ks allies. Either seem likely to me and if, and I repeat if, an accord can come about that backs down Kim then I say good on Trump. That is if. If Putin did not tell Kim outright, back down little brother and let him take the win or we will wring you like a wet sponge. And certainly that is an if too. But isn't that why we visit a conspircy site, to look into 'what ifs'?
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
In a a written brief concerning the phone call to Putin, Trump was warned by his national security advisers to not congratulate Putin. It was spelled out in
CAPITAL LETTERS,,,,JUST LIKE THIS.
If he is going to have the ''best people'' to help him run his White House, why does he ignore them.
In that call he was also advised to condemn the poisoning of the ex-spy in the UK. He ignored that advise also.
Again, if he has ''THE BEST PEOPLE'' advising him,,, why does he ignore that advise?
www.washingtonpost.com...
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
In a a written brief concerning the phone call to Putin, Trump was warned by his national security advisers to not congratulate Putin. It was spelled out in
CAPITAL LETTERS,,,,JUST LIKE THIS.
If he is going to have the ''best people'' to help him run his White House, why does he ignore them.
In that call he was also advised to condemn the poisoning of the ex-spy in the UK. He ignored that advise also.
Again, if he has ''THE BEST PEOPLE'' advising him,,, why does he ignore that advise?
www.washingtonpost.com...
Can I ask one simple question???
Why the hell should we hear about private briefs between the president and his national security advisers?
Does anyone else see just how F up this is?
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
Maybe trasparancy? Not everything that goes on with the people who work for us should be hidden away under the guise of national security.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
Maybe trasparancy? Not everything that goes on with the people who work for us should be hidden away under the guise of national security.
Transparency of what? All the inter actions of the President...lol
How much Transparency did we get from Obama who made transparency one of his campaign promises?
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
In a a written brief concerning the phone call to Putin, Trump was warned by his national security advisers to not congratulate Putin. It was spelled out in
CAPITAL LETTERS,,,,JUST LIKE THIS.
If he is going to have the ''best people'' to help him run his White House, why does he ignore them.
In that call he was also advised to condemn the poisoning of the ex-spy in the UK. He ignored that advise also.
Again, if he has ''THE BEST PEOPLE'' advising him,,, why does he ignore that advise?
www.washingtonpost.com...
Can I ask one simple question???
Why the hell should we hear about private briefs between the president and his national security advisers?
Does anyone else see just how F up this is?
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
In a a written brief concerning the phone call to Putin, Trump was warned by his national security advisers to not congratulate Putin. It was spelled out in
CAPITAL LETTERS,,,,JUST LIKE THIS.
If he is going to have the ''best people'' to help him run his White House, why does he ignore them.
In that call he was also advised to condemn the poisoning of the ex-spy in the UK. He ignored that advise also.
Again, if he has ''THE BEST PEOPLE'' advising him,,, why does he ignore that advise?
www.washingtonpost.com...
Can I ask one simple question???
Why the hell should we hear about private briefs between the president and his national security advisers?
Does anyone else see just how F up this is?
I'm not buying it the whole story sounds made up so they could attack Trump for congratulating Putin. It's standard every president does it in fact Obama did the same in 2012. It's so standard Putin called to congratulate Obama and Trump. It's what you do to help maintain international relations.
Someone please explain why people want to sour Russian relations and start a war?? You must maintain contact without that there will be war. Even during the Cold War with soviets we had to keep communications open it actually prevented a nuclear exchange.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
In a a written brief concerning the phone call to Putin, Trump was warned by his national security advisers to not congratulate Putin. It was spelled out in
CAPITAL LETTERS,,,,JUST LIKE THIS.
If he is going to have the ''best people'' to help him run his White House, why does he ignore them.
In that call he was also advised to condemn the poisoning of the ex-spy in the UK. He ignored that advise also.
Again, if he has ''THE BEST PEOPLE'' advising him,,, why does he ignore that advise?
www.washingtonpost.com...
Can I ask one simple question???
Why the hell should we hear about private briefs between the president and his national security advisers?
Does anyone else see just how F up this is?
I'm not buying it the whole story sounds made up so they could attack Trump for congratulating Putin. It's standard every president does it in fact Obama did the same in 2012. It's so standard Putin called to congratulate Obama and Trump. It's what you do to help maintain international relations.
Someone please explain why people want to sour Russian relations and start a war?? You must maintain contact without that there will be war. Even during the Cold War with soviets we had to keep communications open it actually prevented a nuclear exchange.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
It's very simple. You don't congratulate a ballot-stuffing cheater who thinks that democracy is something that can be twisted like a pretzel and who wants to re-write a lot of borders in Eastern Europe. Trump is a moron and a child.
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
Maybe trasparancy? Not everything that goes on with the people who work for us should be hidden away under the guise of national security.
Transparency of what? All the inter actions of the President...lol
How much Transparency did we get from Obama who made transparency one of his campaign promises?
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
originally posted by: Xtrozero
originally posted by: DogStarIn1066
Maybe trasparancy? Not everything that goes on with the people who work for us should be hidden away under the guise of national security.
Transparency of what? All the inter actions of the President...lol
How much Transparency did we get from Obama who made transparency one of his campaign promises?
All due respect, but you were specifically referencing Trump.
I have a clearance. Clearances deal with how you handle information. Most clearances are for national security, with some emphasis on the state department.
If I say more I will get arrested and sent to gitmo.
But really, most classified stuff is classified because people are overly cautious. It is really easy to classify information, and, well, better safe than sorry.
So most folks classify everything rather than do the work to release it. Nothing sinister most times.
Unless it is.
So, it is pretty much like everyone at work, where ever you work, wants less hassle in their life, so they do things the safe and easy way. In the Fed they classify everything.
Not very good for open government though.
So I am all for forcing the government workers to prove national security before classification, rather than Americans having to prove otherwise after.
Want to join me?
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
It's very simple. You don't congratulate a ballot-stuffing cheater who thinks that democracy is something that can be twisted like a pretzel and who wants to re-write a lot of borders in Eastern Europe. Trump is a moron and a child.
originally posted by: andrewh7
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
originally posted by: RazorV66
Big deal.
As a slight to Leftists everywhere, I would like to congratulate Putin as well.
Ah ha, Another worshiper at the feet of despots. Trump praised what's his name in China for clearing the way to life time ruler-ship and quipped that maybe we could do that here also. Now he just congratulates Putin who looks to be there for life time and you congratulate him also. I guess we know where your patriotism stands, four square behind dictators.
China is a Communist country, that’s how they roll.
Why the hell do you care if Putin rules Russia for life?
You plan on moving there?
It's one of the disadvantages of not being a psychopath - pesky empathy.