Breaking News! third AATP UFO Video Has Been Released!

originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: gortex

that footage was destroyed
it doesnt exists anymore

That footage has never been officially acknowledged so I don't see how anyone could know if it exists or not , other than the keepers of secrets of course.

Lol this video is from 2015 and I've seen it before US elections in sure of it. Epic fail.

my god
so many comments cant answer them all

a reply to: pigsy2400

they said the data is still classified

a reply to: schuyler

because the military released, the us military
military videos of ufos are rare, american one's? almost impossible!

a reply to: beetee

but why?
jeremy is just some weird paranormal documentary guy, he doesnt have acess to the real stuff

Wow...just wow.

That's it ??!?!

Mk...TTS, Blinky and Lou better have a whole sht-ton of stuff orders-of-magnitude better than this third turd. This is gonna be a VEEEERRY long, slow and insanely over-insulated and padded-down endeavor to spare us from the worldwide, massive bat-sht-crazy self-impolsion that would surely take place if/when ETs n UFOs were 'officially' confirmed by TPTB!

ffs

/sarcastic rant...

The real disclosure may never come about. The evidence of government hiding exists, we know they lie.

MJ12 and things like that aren’t proven….And other exotic conspiracy theories aren’t remotely proven and have holes in them the size of Donald Trump’s ego.

Though there are numerous very solid UFO sighting cases that are genuine and prove without a doubt UFOs or UAPs are REAL.

One proof the government is lying and hiding something is the many witnesses who say along with legitimate UFO sightings they have seen real-time US helicopters and other clearly identified US aerial vehicles along with the UFOs, THAT NEVER ARE IDENTIFIED.

What a real disclosure will be is the US government revealing their secret programs. Now, these programs are certainly not as exotic and out there are Steven Greer and others claim, but they are IMO out there to be exposed.
They are not these flimsy videos in the dark with lighted dots on them.



Let's get real

Either sh__ or get off the pot

a reply to: mirageman

thanks!
but as i have said delongue isnt the main point anymore

a reply to: gortex

if it existed at all, it doesnt exists anymore

a reply to: krakatosh

riiiiiiiiggghhhhtttt....

a reply to: KenTodd

are you joking?

a reply to: Willtell

never gonna happen
if you want to uncover the secrets, america will need to fall like the soviet union

a reply to: humanoidlord

getting a little worked up over the responses to this lack luster video aren't ya.

Could easily be a drone from some foreign country if not a secret us one.

The W post link currently is not working. I´m kinda in the dark about who released these videos, the post as well as DeLonge is obviously sharing content but who released it?

a reply to: KansasGirl

Justification for increased military spending?

The guys at ttsa just are not too clever when it comes to analysing their own videos…

In their analysis of the ‘go fast’ video, they state:

The unidentified vehicle appears as a white oval shape moving at high speed from top right to lower left of the screen flying very low over the water.

But in the video, right when the ATFLIR locks onto the object at 1:34, you can see that:
- The F18 is at an altitude of 25.000 feet above the water, flying level
- The ATFLIR is looking slightly down from the F18, at an angle of 26 degrees, straight at the object
- The object it at a distance of 4.4 Nautical Miles = 26.735 feet from the F18

If the object was really flying just above the water surface AND the ATFLIR is looking at it at a shallow angle of just 26 degrees from an F18 flying at 25.000 feet, it would be much farther away.

In fact, the actual altitude of the object can easily be calculated from the data in the ATFLIR screen at 1:34 in the video:
- The difference in altitude between the F18 and the object is 26.735 x sin(26 degrees) = 11.720 feet.
- The F18 is at an altitude of 25.000 feet so the object is at an altitude of 25.000 – 11.720 = 13.280 feet.

So the object is not ‘very low above the water’ as ‘analysed’ by ttsa, but about halfway between the jet and the water in altitude. This means that the apparent speed of the object is highly exaggerated by the parallax effect.

Why ttsa fails to see this straightforward calculation from the data staring them right in the face in the ATFLIR screen is beyond me…

Maybe they do not have the budget for a calculator, so [please donate]

originally posted by: KansasGirl

originally posted by: chunder
a reply to: Arbitrageur

Thanks but definitely wasn't the same video as that, remember it well.

It definitely WAS the same video, just without the talking

The video you refer to has been posted on page 3 of this thread by Kandinsky, it is definitely NOT the Go Fast video.

a reply to: Guest101


Thanks for that expert analysis. Especially:

So the object is not ‘very low above the water’ as ‘analysed’ by ttsa, but about halfway between the jet and the water in altitude. This means that the apparent speed of the object is highly exaggerated by the parallax effect.

Altitude and velocity of object are actually different than the video claims they are.