It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Deplorable
a reply to: Irishhaf
Some people might want to blame it on a President who doesn't keep his campaign promises:
On the first day in office, get rid of gun-free zones at military bases, recruiting centers and, in some cases, schools. These zones are like “target practice for the sickos and for the mentally ill.”
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: face23785
They probably stopped letting kids carry guns in their cars/trucks to schools because of events like this one happening.
Should we start allowing kids to carry guns around school and teachers to keep one under their desks? Sounds like quick and easy access for someone who's in a bad mood.
I hunted growing up.
originally posted by: duesprimusvictorimmortali
instead of arguing about guns you all should be asking why so many white kids shoot up schools
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: face23785
They probably stopped letting kids carry guns in their cars/trucks to schools because of events like this one happening.
Should we start allowing kids to carry guns around school and teachers to keep one under their desks? Sounds like quick and easy access for someone who's in a bad mood.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Soulece
I hunted growing up.
That legitimately scares the heck out of me. You don't even know what a semi-auto is. Either you just lied to my face or your parents were so grossly negligent it boggles the mind.
What kind of gun did you use? A pretty brown one?
TheRedneck
originally posted by: starviego
originally posted by: projectvxn
He was never in the army.
He was in the ROTC, according to early reports. So there is no doubt he received his weapons training care of the DOD.
originally posted by: Im2keul
a reply to: face23785
Those that are not well versed with guns do not realize that hand guns have high capacity magazines.
As another poster mentioned, magazine restrictions aren't gonna slow you down enough to make much difference. I am not a pro, but I can empty my Sig and swap mags fairly quick.
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Soulece
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Soulece
What is the point of this weapon?
Generally the same as any other rifle, since it has the same mechanism as any other rifle. It's for hunting, self defense and/or competition. It's just black and look scary, but it works the same as a wooden-stocked semi-auto.
First off, no it does not work the same. Secondly, why is it needed for defense? Can't a handgun do just as much? Or is it because it can fire off more rounds in a short amount of time? Well you would only need that in what, a zombie invasion? Or, war. Hows it for hunting when something else that is less effective on paper can still do the same thing? Surely you cant need that gun to hunt. I mean heck, a bow and arrow is good enough for hunting. And why competition? Why does this matter?
So again, I ask you, what really do we need those type of guns for? At least access to the public?
..Competition, get outta here lol
Um, yes it does work the same as any other semi-auto rifle, whether it has a wooden stock or black composite stock. You're wrong. Any wooden-stocked semi-auto can be fitted with larger capacity mags. Even if the manufacturer doesn't make them, they're easy to get aftermarket and even if they were banned they're remarkably simple to build. They're literally just a box with a spring inside it.
They're for everything I said they're for. You may not like that answer because you have an agenda, but it's 100% true.
My agenda is limiting amounts of casualties. We can have guns. I do not see necessary fit for some of them. If there's deaths, I want the number to be as minimal as possible. Of course I'm not a law maker so this is just ideals. But that's my agenda.
Your way will not limit the amount of casualties. What limited them in the past was gun education and children being raised to respect life, taking personal responsibility rather than making excuses and teaching them that there is a benefit from being first place, that their opinion matters but not as much as the rule of law and a dozen other things that the left has forced upon the education of our children. No they do not need to learn about sex in 1st grade and then wonder if they need gender reassignment. All of these little jewels brought to us by the left are what has our children so screwed up that they can’t even think straight.
You want to stop school shooting? Taking away guns will not do it, walls around the school will not do it and armed police will not do it. Teaching the kids old fashion principles, respect for fellow citizens and the law and the fear of God will get it done.
These murders are on us all. The left for pressing their stupid corrupt agenda and the right for not stopping them.
So the guy goes in with a pistol. Same thing happens?
Did you not read the post or was it too difficult to understand? I said that the only way to limit shootings in school was to teach our children like we did when school gun violence was low. In other words dump the crazy liberal schooling agenda.
That was a genuine question. I didn't get the answer to it from you, but got it from somebody else. Thanks for pitching in.
You did get an answer. Do you accept the answer is the question, or are you going to continue to proceed as if an AR is different than any other semi-automatic gun, even though that's been thoroughly explained to you to be false? We're trying to help you understand the issue, are you learning anything?
If these shooters used pistols, different outcome. If they used rifles like an ordinary non semi automatic one, it would be a different outcome.
No, it wouldn't be a different outcome. There have been mass shootings like this one using only handguns. I told you that 3 times already and you're ignoring it. Where are you getting the idea that the outcome would be different, when it's demonstrable fact that it could've been done with a handgun?
This is the problem. You don't want to get informed. You just want to peddle debunked gun control propaganda. This is why we can't get anywhere on this issue. If you really want to see a solution, I suggest you become more open-minded and start listening to facts from people who are more knowledgeable on the subject than you.
originally posted by: dreamingawake
a reply to: JWill
I keep seeing this said around the net, but I have yet to see the image with him wearing the Maga hat?