-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings- PART 3

originally posted by: MindBodySpiritComplex

originally posted by: WhatTheory
q868

Already 8 months ago the Guardian got busy pre-debunking:

However, there’s a new breed of video and audio manipulation tools, made possible by advances in artificial intelligence and computer graphics, that will allow for the creation of realistic looking footage of public figures appearing to say, well, anything. Trump declaring his proclivity for water sports. Hillary Clinton describing the stolen children she keeps locked in her wine cellar. Tom Cruise finally admitting what we suspected all along … that he’s a Brony.

The future of fake news: don't believe everything you read, see or hear


In December we got this article from Motherboard:

Someone used an algorithm to paste the face of 'Wonder Woman' star Gal Gadot onto a porn video, and the implications are terrifying.

AI-Assisted Fake Porn Is Here and We’re All #ed

LOL...They KNOW it's coming.

WTF?

Facebook survey asked users if they’d like child porn on the site

www.theguardian.com...

truepundit.com...

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
FYI, Y'all:

Saudi Crown Prince having lunch today with Queen Elizabeth II

I wonder what they'll be talking about? "If I have a clear out like you, should I use The Ritz or The Savoy?"

"Raising concerns about Human Rights"????

Ever since this guy is in charge, the Saudis have more RIGHTS than they have EVER had. Women have been freed from slavery, the oppressive religious police has been eradicated, violence against women is on the decrease, Music and Movies are now permitted in public and the utterly depraved members of the royal family have been incarcerated.

The fact that CNN, Aljazeera, NYTimes, etc. have been attacking this guy, was one of the displays of just how low these news outlets have sunken.

"Concerns about human rights" my azz.

originally posted by: Skyfloating

List of High Profile Private Island Owners

No Epstein? Still valuable, Sir Richard Branson is occurring again and again ... stolen to Q Wiki.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
WTF?

Facebook survey asked users if they’d like child porn on the site

www.theguardian.com...

truepundit.com...

Yep..... and the media want to make a big deal out of Trump paying a woman (a woman that has sex for a living) to remain silent, but it was ok for Slick Willy to have an extramarital affair (with a subordinate, worse yet, an intern) in the White House.

a reply to: IAMTAT

It’s the new “skeptics” guide to debunking.

1. Create a bizarre alternative reality where the statute is plausible deniability.
(Like the one where Anthony Weiner has a weird fetish around creating fake porn featuring famous politicians and underage children)

2. Convince people that your weird made up universe is in fact the only one where individual isn’t certifiable.
(He did it for blackmail and don’t worry that the source vids are still illegal or about what a rawvid is. All this pedo talk has you sounding crazy.)

3. Rinse Repeat

a reply to: Greenanon


That plan would work perfectly for the MSM "news" outlets and their "journalists" if they had credibility. Sadly for them they flushed their credibility down the toilet a long time ago by acting like propaganda machines and political mouthpieces, and more and more people see right through their lies, gaslighting and brainwashing. The power that the MSM once had to control the narrative and manipulate the public is just not there anymore.

In fact, the MSM have become their own worst enemy.
The trust in their "journalists" and pundits is now so low that many people almost instinctively know that if the MSM "news" outlets fight tooth and nail against something, if they work hard to "debunk", ridicule or discredit something, there is a very, very good chance that there is not only smoke but a massive, blazing FIRE behind it all.

Yes, fail the MSM will. And they brought it all upon themselves.

a reply to: MostlyReading

It hasn’t been working for a while now has it?

It’s like a race to stay most woke.

The rabbit hole is a weird place.

originally posted by: Skyfloating
Daily Dot: Far right conspiracy theorists believe a damning Hillary Clinton video will be released today

Thats three distortions in one headline. First of all, we are not "far right", we are merely opposed to MSM Propaganda, Child Rape and Corruption. Does that make us "far right"? You love using that label, having built it up as your primary boogyman for decades now, dont you? Secondly, we are not conspiracy THEORISTS, we are conspiracy FACTUALISTS, having enough facts now to bring down the entire Deep State. Thirdly, we are not claiming "the video" will be released TODAY. We are instead saying that there are numerous videos of high level power players, some of which will be released to a wider public somewhere down the line.

You have to admit we are out on the very thin ice in this one. How will it be able to be proven that's it's not a faked AI video? Can't say I've seen any of those, but I have to think they look pretty hokey and obvious.

This is a big fire we are stoking without any proof that it exists. I'm just saying make sure we have our facts down or else it will be used to discredit the whole venture.

Do we have an article that has direct attributed quotes to the NYPD Chief threatening to release? All I've seen is "he said".

a reply to: pavil

There was a show "The Young Turks" or something that used this tech over a copy of a Bush Jr video. Very convincing.

So why does Q keep saying how STUPID these people are ? Why did Q bring up Dolly the cloned sheep ? Why does Q keep saying that "they" see us as SHEEP ?



Cleaning this whole mess up would sure be VERY COMPLICATED if in fact we are dealing with clones, people controlled by clones or even the " demonic, disco, lizard, aliens " inhabiting clone bodies....YIKES ! I'm going to connect a video series with some guy claiming he's been in the cloning stations and was cloned....REALLY, REALLY weird stuff, that I'm sure most minds, including mine, would normally reject and debunk, but Q said to think BIGGER and this would certainly explain MUCH of the horrible stuff that normal humans just can't imagine other humans being capable of doing AND if these humans have been co-opted how do you punish them or FREE them ? Anyways, lol.....my instincts tell me that there is something to all this we need to understand ?

www.youtube.com...:/

/www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zPk5Qjhejc

originally posted by: pavil

You have to admit we are out on the very thin ice in this one. How will it be able to be proven that's it's not a faked AI video? Can't say I've seen any of those, but I have to think they look pretty hokey and obvious.

It will be visible in Photoshop or similar SW where you can analyze colors. Even AI can not (probably) superimpose images seamlessly.

a reply to: pavil

I don't know who the chief was at the time, but I just found this interesting article.

Accused of Corruption, Former N.Y.P.D. Chief Pleads Guilty to Lesser Charge

The commanders were accused of accepting expensive gifts from Mr. Reichberg and another politically connected executive, Jona S. Rechnitz, that included diamonds, tickets to Brooklyn Nets basketball games, hotel rooms in Rome and Chicago, and a private-jet flight to Las Vegas with a prostitute on board.

I completely forgot about this guy.

Before the original charges were filed against the police commanders, Mr. Rechnitz had already pleaded guilty and provided information in separate fund-raising inquiries that were focused on Mayor Bill de Blasio — before the mayor won a second term.

In March 2017, however, despite federal prosecutors spending months investigating numerous donations to advance Mr. de Blasio’s policy agenda, federal and state prosecutors announced that they would not bring criminal charges against the mayor or his aides.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: IAMTAT
WTF?

Facebook survey asked users if they’d like child porn on the site

www.theguardian.com...

truepundit.com...

Yep..... and the media want to make a big deal out of Trump paying a woman (a woman that has sex for a living) to remain silent, but it was ok for Slick Willy to have an extramarital affair (with a subordinate, worse yet, an intern) in the White House.

Not only is the media ok with slick willy, they helped him to destroy the women he abused!

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
a reply to: pavil

There was a show "The Young Turks" or something that used this tech over a copy of a Bush Jr video. Very convincing.

That's just doing the lips, this would have to be a whole body and head. I'd have to think that's much harder. Look how bad Henry Caviles lip looked in Justice League

The video concept is interesting depending on what your perspective is.

For it to be effective in rallying the Q folks it only has to confirm one notion detailed here. For it to bring others into the fold it has to be self contained, that is to say it is very clear to anyone who sees it in an isolation room what it is. Involving children is the death knell for anyone or anything associated with her and the dems - no more dem party and is far cheaper and better then a trial in my opinion.

As for debunking it, there is a problem. Denial is SOP for the controllers to create desire, so denying it through ban will only make it more of a thing to see. They are rock and hard place here on it if it meets the self contained criteria and even worse it its release comes via say the wiener laptop or other known source. 1/3'rds, the issue here is not will in convince the dead with boots on HRC people, it won't, but how many indifferent people will it effect?

The deeper issue is people, Q folks in particular, shouting "see I told you so" to those who may find this begins to break up their protected world of HRC being a champion for their personal life and by default the dems being a champion and by default the government being a champion: mind control is a problem when it blows up without a safety net nearby......

We Q folks will have to represent this energy in the real world responsibly, many will be truly hurt and upset and our victory will be hollow if we do not consider the downside.

From NBC News

JUST IN: US Justice Dept. says it reaches "conditional settlement agreement" to "begin to produce additional documents related to Operation Fast and Furious" to House Oversight Cmte.

AG Sessions: "This settlement agreement is an important step to make sure that the public finally receives all the facts related to Operation Fast and Furious.”

Could this be a "Boom"?

Someone posted in the last few days with a list of historical paedo scandals - but I can't seem to find it. Was it deleted? Or am I just being an idiot? Anyone know what page it was?

Thanks,

John.

originally posted by: RelSciHistItSufi
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

My Italian granddad stopped being a catholic because of something he learnt (and took to his grave) about a catholic nun-run orphanage behind his house in Trieste. Never found out what it was.

Makes sense about moving the trafficking to 2nd/3rd world countries BUT that also raises the question "What were missionaries REALLY up to in the 19th and early 20th centuries?"

I had to go back and find this post. I think most orphanages and missions started out with the best intentions, but then the evil people start creeping in, attracted by the ready access to vulnerable children. If the people in charge don't see it, or don't take the necessary steps to keep the predators away, in time the predators end up running the place.

a reply to: abago71

No wonder Eric Holder is so hot to impeach Trump. Holder's in big trouble. Fast & Furious was his baby, and on the surface it looks more like an illegal gun-running scheme than any legitimate law enforcement operation.