originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: face23785
How about evidence of a crime? Is that a factor at all?
To gather evidence, you have to conduct a legitimate investigation, which means the investigators have to be third party. Unfortunately, that has yet
to happen in any of the investigations HRC has been put under. Is it normal for a person to have 4-6 federal investigations performed on them and to
come up clean every time?
I mean the Clinton body count is like 30+. They killed people living in the white house, remember the guy who "hung himself" in the white house
bathroom? A guy who was going to conveniently testify against the Clinton's?
A really good criminal doesn't leave evidence, does that mean the crime wasn't committed?
Really... It's fairly obvious that she's legitimately guilty of a multitude of organized crime charges -- from money laundering to murder.
How can you defend a person who's had so many federal investigations and "unexplainable" circumstances happen? How can you defend a person who was
caught lying under oath numerous times?
That's a crime, yet she was caught red handed on the record and still not prosecuted. It was absolutely illegal for her to have that private email
system, and it was absolutely illegal to foster discourse containing classified information on insecure and unreported channels. She was definitely
guilty of that, she even attempted to destroy evidence with bleach bit.
These are all facts and evidence, she even admitted to the destruction of evidence via bleach bit -- what are you defending?
The prosecutors are all her friends, so they just keep refusing to prosecute, it's literally that simple.
There is a legitimate reason people call her the "Teflon Pantsuit." For you to understand that nickname, you have to understand organized crime and
previous mafia bosses that earned the nickname of "Teflon Dons." Everyone KNEW without question these guys were guilty and only a few of them were
ever put away because they did all of their crimes via proxy. Many of the times the actual performer of the crimes were found guilty even though they
were doing it as mercs for hire by the Don.
This is exactly what the Clinton crime family has been doing since the 1970's. The vast majority of people who think HRC is a criminal, actually know
it and have known it for over 20 years. Has nothing to do with Uranium 1, has to do with the body count they have, it has to do with the pay offs for
policy, it has to do with out right corruption and power consolidation. Despite not being president, she's still relevant and has massive influence
on her party and with international policy, even if it's only lobbying.
edit on 15-11-2017 by SRPrime because: (no reason given)