It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Xcathdra
Bro. I heard Hillary Clinton had almost 3 million Americans vote for her. U mad?
Why would I be mad? She lost.
We dont use a national popular vote specifically to prevent tyranny by majority.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: angeldoll
Hillary required removal as an issue.
Mission accomplished.
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Xcathdra
There is no such thing as a national popular vote.
Right. Ha. You should write a book and educate those who think differently. Like, all the rest of us. About Gore too.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: angeldoll
We can keep going back and forth all night but ive learned not to argue with people who lost touch of reality.
Clinton lost.
Trump won.
There is no national popular vote and as I said read the Constitution and you will see that fact.
Get over your butt hurt.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: angeldoll
We can keep going back and forth all night but ive learned not to argue with people who lost touch of reality.
Clinton lost.
Trump won.
There is no national popular vote and as I said read the Constitution and you will see that fact.
Get over your butt hurt.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Xcathdra
There is no such thing as a national popular vote.
Right. Ha. You should write a book and educate those who think differently. Like, all the rest of us. About Gore too.
You will continue to think differently right up until the next time this scenario occurs but the EC favors your horse in the race and popular vote favors that "deplorable guy." That's when you will magically learn all about why the EC was created and how it operates as if you have uncovered some deep and long forgotten wisdom ...
originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
It wasn't a blunder. The polls were taken from popular vote, and she actually DID win the popular vote. So, the projections were accurate at that moment.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
With 20/20 hindsight and retrospect can we ever trust polls again?
Out by 20% even, but I think that documentary on Frank Luntz polling techniques show just how far out the polls can be manufactured to be out.
With only 2 weeks to go to be out this much is "FAKE NEWS"
A year later, it stands as one of the biggest media blunders in modern times. but maybe more an outright lie than a blunder, and it makes them lose credibility. People will always say, "but remember 2016 and Trump" when these crazy figures ever come out again.
originally posted by: angeldoll
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: angeldoll
We can keep going back and forth all night but ive learned not to argue with people who lost touch of reality.
Clinton lost.
Trump won.
There is no national popular vote and as I said read the Constitution and you will see that fact.
Get over your butt hurt.
Okay, in order to show you that I know how to be condescending too, let me say this.
In the course of the presidential election, American voters cast more votes to Hillary Clinton...
You will continue to think differently right up until the next time this scenario occurs but the EC favors your horse in the race and popular vote favors that "deplorable guy." That's when you will magically learn all about why the EC was created and how it operates as if you have uncovered some deep and long forgotten wisdom ...